Influence of different peg length in glenoid bone loss: A biomechanical analysis regarding primary stability of the glenoid baseplate in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Königshausen M,Jettkant B,Sverdlova N,Ehlert C,Gessmann J,Schildhauer T A,Seybold D
Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine
BACKGROUND:There is no biomechanical basis to determine the influence of different length of the central peg of the baseplate anchored within the native scapula in glenoid defect reconstruction in cases of degenerative or posttraumatic glenoid bone loss in reversed shoulder arthroplasty. OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to analyse the stability of different peg lengths used in glenoid bone loss in reversed shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS:Different lengths of metaglene pegs with different depths of peg anchorage performed with or without metaglene screws in sawbone foam blocks were loaded in vertical and horizontal directions for differentiating load capacities. Simulated physiological loadings were then applied to the peg implants to determine the limits of loading in each depth of anchorage. RESULTS:The loading capacity of the implant was reduced as less of the peg was anchored. The vertically loaded implants showed a significantly higher stability, in contrast to those loaded horizontally at a corresponding peg length and depth of anchorage (p < 0.05). The tests revealed that the metaglene screws are more essential for primary stability than is the peg particularly in the vertically directed loadings (2/3 anchored: peg contributed to 28% of the stability, 1/3 anchorage: peg contributed to 12%). Under the second test conditions, the lowest depth of peg anchorage (1/3) resulted in 322 Newtons [N] in the long peg with a vertical loading direction, and in 130 N in the long peg with a horizontal loading direction (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION:The pegs should be anchored as deeply as possible into the native scapula bone stock. The metaglene screws play a major role in the initial stability, in contrast to the peg, and they become more important when the depth of the peg anchorage is reduced. If possible, four metaglene screws should be used in cases of uncontained bone loss to guarantee the highest stability.
10.3233/THC-151031
The effect of screw position on the initial fixation of a reverse total shoulder prosthesis in a glenoid with a cavitary bone defect.
Codsi Michael J,Iannotti Joseph P
Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
Patients with rotator cuff tear arthropathy can be treated successfully with a reverse total shoulder prosthesis. In patients with significant glenoid bone loss, achieving stable bone fixation can be challenging, as the surgeon must know when bone grafting is necessary and when the plan to implant the reverse total shoulder prosthesis should be abandoned because of the likelihood of early implant loosening. The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the initial stability of a metal glenoid implant fixed in a glenoid with a central cavitary defect and (2) to determine whether an altered screw configuration would sufficiently resist implant micromotion and, thereby, allow bone ingrowth to occur. The Delta III reverse total shoulder glenoid implant was fixed into foam scapulae with a uniform density similar to normal glenoid bone density. The control group implants were fixed into foam scapulae without a glenoid defect, by use of the standard surgical technique for screw placement. The second group was fixed into foam scapulae containing a central cavitary glenoid defect, by use of the standard surgical technique for screw placement. The central cavitary defect was meant to simulate the bone loss typically found after the removal of a loose pegged glenoid implant, and it was created with a 4-pegged glenoid drill guide. A third group was fixed into foam scapula with a central cavitary glenoid defect, with an experimental screw configuration by use of a posterior screw directed toward the spine of the scapula and an anterior screw directed inferior to the central peg. All specimens were loaded with 500 cycles of 1 body weight (70 kg) to simulate the forces generated during arm elevation that occur during the first 3 months after surgery. Micromotion between the implant and the foam bone was measured with a digital video motion analysis system (accuracy, +/- 2.6 microm). After loading of the implant with 70 kg for 500 cycles in the superior direction, the mean micromotion was 54 microm (SD, 22) in the control group, 159 microm (SD, 70) in the second group, and 86 microm (SD, 32) in the third group (P = 0.003). Fixing the posterior screw into the spine of the scapula and directing the anterior screw below the central peg decreased the micromotion of a metal glenoid implant fixed in a glenoid with a cavitary defect by 46% and, more importantly, reduced the micromotion below the critical threshold of 150 microm, which is necessary for bone ingrowth and long-term survival of the implant.
10.1016/j.jse.2007.09.002
Biomechanical analysis of anterior bone graft augmentation with reversed shoulder arthroplasty in large combined glenoid defects compared with total bony joint line reconstruction (modified bony-increased-offset reversed shoulder arthroplasty).
Königshausen Matthias,Sverdlova Nina,Mersmann Corinna,Ehlert Christoph,Jettkant Birger,Dermietzel Rolf,Schildhauer Thomas Armin,Seybold Dominik
Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
BACKGROUND:The aim of this biomechanical study was to compare 2 surgical techniques for the reconstruction of large, combined, uncontained glenoid defects with reversed shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). METHODS:Three groups of scapulae with RSA were tested by the application of a physiological combination of compressive/shear loads in Sawbones (Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., Vashon Island, WA, USA) and cadavers. Two of the groups (both Sawbones and cadaveric specimens) consisted of anterior combined defects (14 mm in depth), and the third group served as a control group (only Sawbones specimens). The first group with an anterior combined defect was reconstructed with anterior bone grafts to contain the defect and cancellous bone to fill the central defect before RSA with partial bony joint line reconstruction (p-BJR). In the second group with an anterior combined defect, the dorsal rim was reamed and the joint line was reconstructed with a bone disc fully covering the peg. This total BJR (t-BJR) corresponds to the technique of bony-increased-offset-RSA (BIO-RSA). RESULTS:At 150 µm of displacement, the loadings in the inferior-superior (IS) direction were significantly more stable than those in the anterior-to-posterior (AP) direction within both reconstructed defect groups (P ≤ .002). In contrast, no significant differences were found between the partial BJR and t-BJR group in either direction (Sawbones: AP: P = .29; IS: P = .44; cadavers: AP: P = .67; IS: P = .99). The control group revealed significantly higher values in all loadings of the IS direction and significantly higher loadings at 40 µm and 150 µm in the AP direction. CONCLUSION:Both techniques could be applied for such complex defects provided that there is sufficient medial bone stock for a t-BJR. Significantly greater stability was found in the IS direction than in the AP direction within each group, which could be explained by the longer screw anchoring within the superior and inferior columns. Both defect groups were less stable than the group of intact glenoids.
10.1016/j.jse.2017.04.021
Mid-term results of the use of structural humeral head autograft to correct glenoid bone loss in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
JSES international
Background:Native glenoid bone loss presents technical challenges in shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to report the mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients treated with structural humeral head autograft reconstruction of glenoid bone loss in the setting of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Methods:Retrospective review of 30 shoulders in 28 patients undergoing rTSA with a structural humeral head autograft to correct glenoid bone loss. Demographics, comorbidities, anatomic details, and patient-reported outcome measures were collected for analysis. Results:Range of motion and patient-reported outcome measures were all significantly improved postoperatively ( < .001). Bone grafts were found to incorporate into 100% of shoulders, with no protheses displaying signs of loosening or other structural concerns. No revision procedures were performed, and all patients were satisfied with their shoulder postoperatively. Two patients developed scapular notching on follow-up. Discussion:The use of a humeral head autograft to reconstruct glenoid bone loss in patients undergoing rTSA is a safe and effective procedure. It allows for a local graft source to be utilized thus avoiding potential comorbidity and complications associated with the use of alternative site autografts or allografts and has the advantage of nearly congruent fit within the defect.
10.1016/j.jseint.2023.08.018
Early functional recovery after two-stage surgery with an allogenic bone graft for baseplate loosening in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a case report.
Fujita medical journal
OBJECTIVES:Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for cuff tear arthropathy results in good shoulder function. However, RSA is associated with several complications, including infection, dislocation of the shoulder joint, implant loosening, and axillary nerve palsy. Several problems may also occur on the glenoid side, including bone defects of the glenoid, baseplate loosening, and displacement of the sphere. Herein, we report a 79-year-old man who obtained early functional recovery following a two-stage operation with an allogenic bone graft to treat baseplate loosening and a glenoid bone defect after RSA. CASE REPORT:The patient presented with pain during motion and limited active shoulder joint movement 5 weeks after undergoing RSA for cuff tear arthropathy. CT revealed baseplate loosening and a glenoid bone defect; these complications were treated via a two-stage operation. The first stage comprised the removal of all implants and the grafting of allogenic bone from the femoral head into the glenoid defect. Six months later, CT confirmed complete union of the grafted bone and glenoid. The second stage comprised the re-insertion of all implants. Two months after the last operation, the active shoulder range of motion of the affected side was almost identical to that of the contralateral side. CONCLUSION:Good early functional recovery was obtained using a two-stage operation for baseplate loosening after RSA. Allogenic bone grafting was effective in the reconstruction of the glenoid defect.
10.20407/fmj.2020-002
Benefits of a metallic lateralized baseplate prolonged by a long metallic post in reverse shoulder arthroplasty to address glenoid bone loss.
Valenti Philippe,Sekri Johanna,Kany Jean,Nidtahar Imen,Werthel Jean-David
International orthopaedics
BACKGROUND:Severe glenoid bone loss remains a surgical challenge. This condition is known to be associated with high rates of glenoid component failure. PURPOSE:The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of a lateralized metal-backed 15.2-mm keeled baseplate prolonged by a thin 24.8-mm metallic post fixed directly in the subscapularis fossa in primary cases of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for severe glenoid bone loss and in revision cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Between January 2011 and December 2014, 51 shoulders (50 patients) underwent primary or revision RSA using this baseplate. Forty-five shoulders in 44 patients were followed for a minimum of two years (mean, 33 months; range, 24-60 months). The mean age of the patients was 76 years (range, 55-93 years). Outcome measures included pain, range of motion, Constant Score, and complications. RESULTS:The complication rate was 12% in primary cases and 25% in revision cases. One glenoid implant (4%) failed in primary cases and one glenoid implant (5%) failed in revision cases. Pain and range of motion were significantly improved in both groups. The mean Constant Score improved from 24 (± 7) to 62 (± 9) in primary cases and from 24 (± 10) to 58 (± 12) in revision cases. CONCLUSION:A lateralized metal-backed 15.2-mm keeled baseplate prolonged by a thin 24.8-mm metallic post fixed directly in the subscapularis fossa may provide satisfactory mid-term outcomes in patients with large glenoid bone defects where initial press-fit of a regular baseplate is impossible to obtain.
10.1007/s00264-018-4249-4
Bone Grafting the Glenoid Versus Use of Augmented Glenoid Baseplates with Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Jones Richard B,Wright Thomas W,Roche Christopher P
Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013)
BACKGROUND:Large glenoid defects are a difficult reconstructive problem for surgeons performing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Options to address glenoid defects include eccentric reaming, bone grafting, and augmented glenoid baseplates. Augmented glenoid baseplates may provide a simpler, cost-effective, bone-preserving option compared to other techniques. No studies report the use of augmented baseplates to correct glenoid deformity in rTSA relative to the use of glenoid bone graft. MATERIALS AND METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed 80 patients that received a primary rTSA and received either a structural bone graft or an augmented glenoid baseplate to address a significant glenoid defect. There were 39 patients in the augmented baseplate cohort and 41 patients in the bone graft cohort. The augmented baseplate cohort contained 24 8° posterior augment implants and 15 10° superior augment baseplates. The bone graft cohort consisted of 36 autograft humeral heads and 5 allograft femoral heads. The average follow-up for rTSA patients with an augmented baseplate was 28.3 ± 5.7 months, and the average follow-up for rTSA patients with glenoid bone graft was 34.1 ± 15.0 months. Each patient was scored preoperatively and at latest follow-up using the SST, UCLA, ASES, Constant, and SPADI metrics. Range of motion data was obtained as well. RESULTS:All patients demonstrated significant improvements in pain, ROM, and functional scores following treatment with rTSA using either augmented baseplates or glenoid bone graft to correct glenoid defects. The database contained no complications for the augmented glenoid baseplate cohort, and six complications (14.6%) for the glenoid bone graft cohort (including two glenoid loosenings and graft failures). Additionally, the augmented baseplate cohort showed a lower scapular notching rate of 10% as compared to the bone graft cohort which had a notching rate of 18.5%. DISCUSSION:The results of this study suggest that either augmented glenoid baseplates or glenoid bone graft can be used to address large glenoid defects during rTSA with significant improvement in outcomes. Augmented glenoid baseplates may achieve a lower complication and scapular notching rate, but additional and longer-term clinical follow-up is required to confirm these results.
The Use of Glenoid Structural Allografts for Glenoid Bone Defects in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Journal of clinical medicine
The use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a primary and revision implant is increasing. Advances in implant design and preoperative surgical planning allow the management of complex glenoid defects. As the demand for treating severe bone loss increases, custom allograft composites are needed to match the premorbid anatomy. Baseplate composite structural allografts are used in patients with eccentric and centric defects to restore the glenoid joint line. Preserving bone stock is important in younger patients where a revision surgery is expected. The aim of this article is to present the assessment, planning, and indications of femoral head allografting for bony defects of the glenoid. The preoperative surgical planning and the surgical technique to execute the plan with a baseplate composite graft are detailed. The preliminary clinical and radiological results of 29 shoulders which have undergone this graft planning and surgical technique are discussed. Clinical outcomes included visual analogue score of pain (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Constant-Murley score (CS), satisfaction before and after operation, and active range of motion. Radiological outcomes included graft healing and presence of osteolysis or loosening. The use of composite grafts in this series has shown excellent clinical outcomes, with an overall graft complication rate in complex bone loss cases of 8%. Femoral head structural allografting is a valid and viable surgical option for glenoid bone defects in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
10.3390/jcm13072008
Is bone grafting always necessary in revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with uncontained glenoid bone defects?
Verstuyft Lotte,Vergison Laurence,Van Tongel Alexander,De Wilde Lieven
Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
BACKGROUND:Patients with an uncontained glenoid bone defect can still successfully undergo a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). Currently, there is a tendency toward reconstruction of the premorbid glenoid plane with bone grafts, which is technically demanding. We investigated whether central peg positioning in the spine pillar (CPPSP) is a more feasible alternative to the use of bone grafts. METHODS:This study included 60 revisions to an RTSA with uncontained glenoid bone defects. Patients were treated with bone grafts in 29 cases and with the CPPSP technique in 31 cases. We assessed clinical results using the Constant score and assessed the complication rate. RESULTS:The Constant score changed from 42 to 69 points in the CPPSP group and from 47 to 60 points in the bone graft group. This difference in the increase in the Constant score was significant (P = .031) owing to a significant difference in strength in favor of the CPPSP group. The overall complication rate was 37.7% (20 of 53 patients), with a reoperation rate of 18.9% (10 of 53). Dislocations occurred only in the CPPSP group (n = 3), and loosening of the glenoid occurred only in the bone graft group (n = 3). CONCLUSION:Patients with uncontained glenoid bone defects undergoing revision to an RTSA obtain similar clinical results with the CPPSP technique compared with the use of bone grafts. The CPPSP technique is a valid alternative but results in different complications.
10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.033
Augmented baseplates yield optimum outcomes when compared with bone graft augmentation for managing glenoid deformity during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective comparative study.
Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
PURPOSE:The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) using glenoid bone grafting (BG rTSA) with primary rTSA using augmented glenoid baseplates (Aug rTSA) with a minimum 2-year follow-up. METHODS:A total of 520 primary rTSA patients treated with 8° posterior glenoid augments (n = 246), 10° superior glenoid augments (n = 97), or combined 10° superior/8° posterior glenoid augments (n = 177) were compared with 47 patients undergoing glenoid bone grafting for glenoid bone insufficiency. The mean follow-up was 37.0(±16) and 53.0(±27) months, respectively. Outcomes were analyzed preoperatively and at the latest follow-up using conventional statistics and stratification by minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) thresholds where applicable. Radiographs were analyzed for baseplate failure, and the incidences of postoperative complications and revisions were recorded. RESULTS:The glenoid Aug rTSA cohort had greater improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and range of motion when compared with the BG rTSA group at a minimum of 2-year follow-up, including Simple Shoulder Test, Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, University of California Los Angeles score, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index score, shoulder function, Shoulder Arthroplasty Smart score, abduction, and external rotation (P < .05). Patient satisfaction was higher in the Aug rTSA group compared with the BG rTSA group (P = .006). The utilization of an augmented glenoid component instead of glenoid bone grafting resulted in approximately 50% less total intraoperative time (P < .001), nearly 33% less intraoperative blood loss volume (P < .001), approximately 3-fold less scapular notching (P < .01), and approximately 8-fold less adverse events requiring revision (P < .01) when compared with the BG rTSA cohort. Aside from SCB for abduction, the Aug rTSA cohort achieved higher rates of exceeding MCID and SCB for every PROM compared with BG rTSA. More specifically, 77.6% and 70.2% of the Aug rTSA achieved SCB for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index vs. 55% and 48.6% in the BG rTSA, respectively (P = .003 and P = .013). CONCLUSION:The present midterm clinical and radiographic study demonstrates that the utilization of an augmented baseplate for insufficient glenoid bone stock is superior as judged by multiple PROMs and range of motion metrics when compared with bone graft augmentation at minimum 2-year follow-up. In addition, when analyzed according to MCID and SCB thresholds, the use of augmented baseplates outperforms the use of glenoid bone grafting. Complication and revision rates also favor the use of augmented glenoid baseplates over glenoid bone grafting. Long-term clinical and radiographic follow-up is necessary to confirm that these promising midterm results are durable.
10.1016/j.jse.2022.10.015
Midterm outcomes of bone grafting in glenoid defects treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Lopiz Yaiza,García-Fernández Carlos,Arriaza Alvaro,Rizo Belen,Marcelo Hector,Marco Fernando
Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
BACKGROUND:Large glenoid defects are a difficult reconstructive problem for shoulder surgeons. The purpose of this study was to determine the complications, rate of healing, and functional results of glenoid bone grafting in primary or revision surgery with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed 23 patients with glenoid bone loss who underwent primary or revision surgery using a glenoid bone graft with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Range of motion and the Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and visual analog scale scores were obtained from preoperative assessment and the latest follow-up visit. Radiographic evaluation included analysis of plain radiographs as well as preoperative and follow-up computed tomography. RESULTS:Three patients were excluded from the study. Allografts were used in 13 cases and autografts in 7 cases. The mean Constant score improved from 30.7 ± 9.4 to 51.3 ± 13.4 (P < .001). At a mean follow-up of 26 months, computed tomography imaging revealed that the glenoid bone graft was fully incorporated in 95% of cases. No statistically significant differences were found on analysis of the clinical and radiographic outcomes related to the graft source. There was a 20% postoperative complication rate: 1 case of aseptic glenoid component loosening, 1 surgical wound hematoma, 1 acromial fracture, and a symptomatic grade 3 scapular notching. CONCLUSIONS:The use of bone grafts in glenoid defects is a useful technique by which, in the majority of cases, single-stage reconstruction surgery may be performed, even in the presence of severe bone loss. Incorporation rates are high, with satisfactory clinical outcome.
10.1016/j.jse.2017.01.017
The base of coracoid process as a reference for glenoid reconstruction in primary or revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty: CT-based anatomical study.
Ott Nadine,Kieback Jan-Dirk,Welle Kristan,Paul Christian,Burger Christof,Kabir Koroush
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
INTRODUCTION:Joint replacement surgery as a treatment for glenohumeral arthritis with glenoid bone loss is challenging. The aim of this study is to offer an anatomical orientation for glenoid reconstruction. METHODS:In this study, we measured size, inclination and version of the glenoid surface, as well as the distance between the articular line of the glenoid, base of the coracoid process, and acromion using computer tomographic (CT) imaging of 131 study participants aged 19-88 years in the period of 2010-2013. RESULTS:We measured a mean distance of 6.5 ± 0.2 mm from the glenoid articular line to the base of the coracoid process in the transverse CT plane. Body height has shown no significant impact on the glenoid morphology. We observed significant differences between males and females: The glenoid appeared to be located 5.2 ± 0.9 mm higher and the humeral head was 4.5 ± 0.7 mm larger in male subjects compared with females (r = .699; p < .01). CONCLUSION:In our study, the base of the coracoid offers an anatomical reference during reconstruction of the glenoid in primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty. As only 2D-CT imaging allows for accurate assessment of glenoid bone defects, we consider conventional X-ray imaging insufficient for proper preoperative planning before shoulder arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:III.
10.1007/s00402-020-03642-w
The Impact of Anterior Glenoid Defects on Reverse Shoulder Glenoid Fixation in a Composite Scapula Model.
Roche Christopher P,Stroud Nicholas J,Palomino Pablo,Flurin Pierre-Henri,Wright Thomas W,Zuckerman Joseph D,DiPaola Matthew J
Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013)
BACKGROUND:Achieving glenoid fixation with anterior bone loss can be challenging. Limited guidelines have been established for critical defect sizes that can be treated without supplemental bone graft when performing reverse shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS:We quantified the impact of two sizes of anterior glenoid defects on glenoid baseplate fixation in a composite scapula using the ASTM F 2028-14 reverse shoulder glenoid loosening test method. RESULTS:All glenoid baseplates remained well-fixed after cyclic loading in composite scapula without a defect and in scapula with an 8.5 mm anterior glenoid defect; however, one of seven baseplates loosened in a scapula with a 12.5 mm defect. No difference was observed between pre- and post-cyclic baseplate displacements in scapula with 8.5 mm or 12.5 mm defects or in the control group scapula. However, baseplate displacement in scapula with 12.5 mm anterior defects was significantly greater after cyclic loading than that of baseplates in 8.5 mm defects (superior-inferior displacement, p = 0.0004; anterior-posterior displacement, p < 0.0001), where baseplate displacement in 8.5 mm (superior- inferior displacement, p = 0.0003; anterior-posterior displacement, p = 0.0014) and 12.5 mm (superior-inferior displacement, p < 0.0001; anterior-posterior displacement, p < 0.0001) defects after cyclic loading was significantly greater than that of baseplates in scapula without a defect. DISCUSSION:Adequate and stable fixation can be achieved in scapula with anterior glenoid defects of at least 8.5 mm in this biomechanical model using an established testing methodology; however, supplemental bone grafting should be utilized for anterior glenoid defects of 12.5 mm and larger using the reverse shoulder prosthesis tested in this study.
Superior glenoid inclination and glenoid bone loss : Definition, assessment, biomechanical consequences, and surgical options.
Favard L,Berhouet J,Walch G,Chaoui J,Lévigne C
Der Orthopade
Correct anatomical alignment of the glenoid component is of central importance for wear and loosening in shoulder endoprostheses. The aim of this article is to review and clarify the biomechanical and clinical effects of incorrect glenoid inclination in reverse and anatomical joint replacements. Based on the literature and on our own work, statements are made about the following: (1) the glenoid inclination of a normal glenoid, a degenerative glenoid and a glenoid implant, and the consequences if superior inclination is too large, and (2) the surgical technique as well as tips and tricks for correct adjustment of the inclination. The inclination of the glenoid plane is a morphological parameter of the scapula with high individual variation and is best measured using reformatted computed tomography using three-dimensional software for reconstruction and evaluation. The standard value is between 0 and 10°. Excessive superior inclination promotes translation of the humeral head and the formation of rotator cuff tears-in a degenerative glenoid, to superior wear. The correct amount of superior inclination of the glenoid component is essential for the survival of the implant. Positioning without excessive superior inclination is therefore mandatory. Precise preoperative determination of glenoid inclination and wear is important in order to correctly plan the positioning of an implant. This serves as the basis for deciding whether a bone graft or patient-specific instrumentation is necessary. Thus, the surgeon also has prognostic parameters for the anticipation of possible complications as a result of the bone defect and abnormal orientation. However, the evaluation must always include the position of the scapula in these considerations.
10.1007/s00132-017-3496-1
Early radiographic failure of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with structural bone graft for glenoid bone loss.
Ho Jason C,Thakar Ocean,Chan Wayne W,Nicholson Thema,Williams Gerald R,Namdari Surena
Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
INTRODUCTION:Structural glenoid bone grafting in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has previously been reported to have good functional outcomes and low complication rates. We have observed different complication rates and hypothesized that baseplate fixation and severity of deformity may be predictors of early failure. METHODS:We retrospectively identified 44 patients who underwent RSA with structural bone grafting for glenoid bone defects. All patients had preoperative and postoperative (Grashey and axillary) radiographs at a minimum of 1 year after surgery and within 3 months of surgery for evaluation of implant and graft positioning. Clinical data and outcome scores were collected at the same intervals. RESULTS:There were 61% females and 39% males, with an average age of 74 ± 8 years at the time of surgery. The median final radiographic follow-up was 20 months, with 37 primary RSA and 7 revision RSA. Graft resorption was found in 11 of 44 patients (25%), and radiographic failure was found in 11 of 44 patients (25%) at a median of 8 months (range 3-51 months). Forward elevation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores all significantly improved postoperatively (P < .0001). Radiographic baseplate failure was associated with graft resorption (P = .002), more retroversion correction (P = .02), and worse SANE scores at final follow-up (P = .01). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION:RSA with structural bone graft improved range of motion and function, but there was a larger than previously reported baseplate loosening rate. This early radiographic loosening appeared to be associated with graft resorption, retroversion correction, and worse outcome scores.
10.1016/j.jse.2019.07.035
Effects of acquired glenoid bone defects on surgical technique and clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Klein Steven M,Dunning Page,Mulieri Philip,Pupello Derek,Downes Katheryne,Frankle Mark A
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
BACKGROUND:Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is the accepted method of treatment for selected shoulder disorders. The purpose of this study was to compare primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty surgical techniques as well as clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with acquired glenoid bone defects and in those with normal glenoid morphology. METHODS:Preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography scans were performed on 216 shoulders in 211 patients undergoing primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty between 2004 and 2007. The glenoids were classified as normal or abnormal on the basis of preoperative radiographs and three-dimensional reconstructions of the scapula. One hundred and forty-three shoulders had been followed for two years. There were eighty-seven normal and fifty-six abnormal glenoids. The surgical techniques that were compared included bone-grafting and glenosphere selection. The clinical outcomes for the two groups were compared with respect to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. RESULTS:Surgical technique differed between the groups. All fifty-six glenoids with acquired bone defects had center screw placement along an alternative (scapular spine) centerline. A bone graft was used in twenty-two shoulders with acquired glenoid bone defects compared with none of those with normal glenoid morphology (p = 0.016). Shoulders with glenoid defects were treated with larger glenospheres (36 or 40 mm) more often than those with normal glenoids (p < 0.001). No significant difference was detected between the groups with regard to the preoperative or postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. Radiographs did not demonstrate failure or resorption of a glenoid bone graft when present. All outcomes improved significantly postoperatively. There were five complications, and one patient was unsatisfied with the result. CONCLUSIONS:Glenoid bone defects, when managed with an alteration of surgical technique, including bone-grafting when indicated, are not a contraindication to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
10.2106/JBJS.I.00778
Reverse arthroplasty for patients with chronic locked dislocation of the shoulder (type 2 fracture sequela).
Raiss Patric,Edwards T Bradley,Bruckner Thomas,Loew Markus,Zeifang Felix,Walch Gilles
Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
BACKGROUND:The aim of this multicenter study was to analyze the clinical and radiographic outcome and to report on the types of complications in patients with chronic locked shoulder dislocation treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS:Twenty-two patients with a mean age of 71 years were included. The mean duration of follow-up was 3.5 years. Preoperatively, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans were performed and analyzed for bone defects and the status of the rotator cuff. Radiographs in 2 planes were obtained before arthroplasty and at final follow-up (mean, 3.5 years; range, 2-9 years). The Constant-Murley score was documented, together with active shoulder flexion, external rotation, and internal rotation. RESULTS:There was a significant increase in mean Constant-Murley score from 13.6 points preoperatively to 47.4 points postoperatively (P < .001). Mean shoulder flexion was 37.7° before arthroplasty and 103° thereafter (P < .001). External rotation increased from -0.5° to 14.7° (P < .003). There were 7 complications (32%), leading to revision surgery in 6 cases (27%). The most common reason for revision surgery was failure of the glenoid component due to bone defects on the glenoid side. Eight patients rated their subjective result as very good, 5 as good, 5 as satisfactory, and 4 as unsatisfactory. CONCLUSION:Reverse shoulder arthroplasty may be a viable treatment option for chronic locked shoulder dislocations with concomitant rotator cuff lesions and an intact glenoid. However, improvement in function is only fair and in this series, there was a high percentage of complications requiring re-operation.
10.1016/j.jse.2016.05.028
Treatment of severe glenoid deficiencies in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: the Glenius Glenoid Reconstruction System experience.
Debeer Philippe,Berghs Bart,Pouliart Nicole,Van den Bogaert Gert,Verhaegen Filip,Nijs Stefaan
Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
BACKGROUND:The treatment of glenoid bone deficiencies in primary or revision total shoulder arthroplasty is challenging. This retrospective study evaluated the short-term clinical and radiologic results of a new custom-made patient-specific glenoid implant. METHODS:We treated 10 patients with severe glenoid deficiencies with the Glenius Glenoid Reconstruction System (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium). Outcome data included a patient-derived Constant-Murley score, a visual analog score (VAS), a satisfaction score, the 11-item version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and the Simple Shoulder Test. We compared the postoperative position of the implant with the preoperative planned position on computed tomography scans. RESULTS:At an average follow-up period of 30.5 months, the mean patient-derived Constant-Murley score was 41.3 ± 17.5 points (range, 18-76 points) with a visual analog scale of 3.3 ± 2.5 points (range, 0-7 points). The mean 11-item version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 35.8 ± 18.4 (range, 2-71), and the mean Simple Shoulder Test was 47.5% ± 25.3% (range, 8%-92%). Eight patients reported the result as better (n = 3) or much better (n = 5). One patient had an elongation of the brachial plexus, and 1 patient had a period of instability. The average preoperative glenoid defect size was 9 ± 4 cm (range, 1-14 cm). The mean deviation between the preoperative planned and the postoperative version and inclination was 6° ± 4° (range 1°-16°) and 4° ± 4° (range 0°-11°), respectively. CONCLUSION:Early results of the Glenius Glenoid Reconstruction System are encouraging. Adequate pain relief, a reasonable functionality, and good patient satisfaction can be obtained in these difficult cases. Further follow-up will determine the bony ingrowth and subsequent longevity of this patient-specific glenoid component.
10.1016/j.jse.2018.11.061
The effect of eccentric glenoid reaming in reverse shoulder artrhoplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis.
Journal of orthopaedics
Background:The objective of this study was to evaluate the abilitiy of eccentric reaming in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA), to correct preoperative glenoid retroversion and to compare with cuff tear arthopaty (CTA) cases. Methods:Fifty-nine patients who underwent RSA with GHOA or CTA diagnosis between 2013 and 2022 and who had pre- and postoperative computed tomography scans were included in the study. Preoperative glenoid version and postoperative glenoid component versions of 17 patients with GHOA and 40 patients with CTA were measured by Friedman method. Results:The median preoperative glenoid versions in GHOA and CTA groups were measured as 16° and 4° retroverted respectively (p < 0.01). The median postoperative glenoid component versions in GHOA and CTA groups were 5° and 3° retroverted respectively (p = 0.09). The version change differences between the two groups varied significantly (p < 0.01). Conclusions:GHOA is related with higher preoperative glenoid retroversion compared to CTA. However; with eccentric glenoid reaming, adequate version correction and similar postoperative glenoid version can be achieved in GHOA compared to CTA when performing a RSA. Level of evidence:Level III. Retrospective study. Treatment study.
10.1016/j.jor.2023.11.073
Femoral head allograft for glenoid bone loss in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: functional and radiologic outcomes.
Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
BACKGROUND:Several techniques have been adopted during primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to manage glenoid bone defect. Among bone grafts, humeral head autograft is currently the mainstream option. However, autologous humeral heads may be unavailable or inadequate, and allografts may be a viable alternative. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the functional and radiologic outcomes of femoral head allografts for glenoid bone defects in primary RSA. METHODS:We conducted a retrospective study with prospective data collection enrolling 20 consecutive patients who underwent RSA with femoral head allografts for glenoid bone defects. Indications for surgery were eccentric cuff tear arthropathy in 10 cases (50%), concentric osteoarthritis in 9 cases (45%), and fracture sequelae in 1 case (5%). Each patient was evaluated preoperatively and at follow-up by radiologic and computed tomography (CT) and by assessing the range of motion (ROM) and the Constant-Murley score (CMS). A CT-based software, a patient-specific 3D model of the scapula, and patient-specific instrumentation were used to shape the graft and to assess the position of K-wire for the central peg. Postoperatively, CT scans were used to identify graft incorporation and resorption. RESULTS:After a median follow-up of 26.5 months (24-38), ROM and CMS showed a statistically significant improvement (all P = .001). The median measures of the graft were as follows: 28 mm (28-29) for diameter, 22° (10°-31°) for angle, 4 mm (2-8 mm) for minimum thickness, and 15 mm (11-21 mm) for maximum thickness. Before the surgery, the median glenoid version was 21.8° (16.5°-33.5°) for the retroverted glenoids and -13.5° (-23° to -12°) for the anteverted glenoids. At the follow-up, the median postoperative baseplate retroversion was 5.7° (2.2°-1.5°) (P = .001), and this value was close to the 4° retroversion planned on the preoperative CT-based software. Postoperative major complications were noted in 4 patients: 2 dislocations, 1 baseplate failure following a high-energy trauma, and 1 septic baseplate failure. Partial graft resorption without glenoid component failure was observed in 3 cases that did not require revision surgery. CONCLUSION:The femoral head allograft for glenoid bone loss in primary RSA restores shoulder function, with CMS values comparable to those of sex- and age-matched healthy individuals. A high rate of incorporation of the graft and satisfactory correction of the glenoid version can be expected after surgery. The management of glenoid bone defects remains a challenging procedure, and a 15% risk of major complication must be considered.
10.1016/j.jse.2023.06.027
Angled BIO-RSA (bony-increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty): a solution for the management of glenoid bone loss and erosion.
Boileau Pascal,Morin-Salvo Nicolas,Gauci Marc-Olivier,Seeto Brian L,Chalmers Peter N,Holzer Nicolas,Walch Gilles
Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
BACKGROUND:Glenoid deficiency and erosion (excessive retroversion/inclination) must be corrected in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to avoid prosthetic notching or instability and to maximize function, range of motion, and prosthesis longevity. This study reports the results of RSA with an angled, autologous glenoid graft harvested from the humerus (angled BIO-RSA). METHODS:A trapezoidal bone graft, harvested from the humeral head and fixed with a long-post baseplate and screws, was used to compensate for residual glenoid bone loss/erosion. For simple to moderate (<25°) glenoid defects, standardized instrumentation combined with some eccentric reaming (<15°) was used to reconstruct the glenoid and obtain neutral implant alignment. For severe (>25°) and complex (multiplanar) glenoid bone defects, patient-specific grafts and guides were used after 3-dimensional planning. Patients were reviewed with minimum 2 years of follow-up. Mean follow-up was 36 months (range, 24-81 months). Preoperative and postoperative measurements of inclination and version were performed in the plane of the scapula on computed tomography images. RESULTS:The study included 54 patients (41 women, 13 men; mean 73 years old). Fifteen patients had combined vertical and horizontal glenoid bone deficiency. Among E2/E3 glenoids, inclination improved from 37° (range, 14° to 84°) to 10.2° (range -28° to 36°, P < .001). Among B2/C glenoids, retroversion improved from -21° (range, -49° to 0°) to -10.6° (-32° to 4°, P = .06). Complete radiographic incorporation of the graft occurred in 94% (51 of 54). Complications included infection in 1 and clinical aseptic baseplate loosening in 2. Mild notching occurred in 25% (13 of 51) of patients. Constant-Murley and Subjective Shoulder Value assessments increased from 31 to 68 and from 30% to 83%, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSION:Angled BIO-RSA predictably corrects glenoid deficiency, including severe (>25°) multiplanar deformity. Graft incorporation is predictable. Advantages of using an autograftharvested in situ include bone stock augmentation, lateralization, low donor-site morbidity, low relative cost, and flexibility needed to simultaneously correct posterior and superior glenoid defects.
10.1016/j.jse.2017.05.024
Large Glenoid Defects Treated by Multiple Bioresorbable Pinning-Assisted Bone-Grafting in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.
JBJS essential surgical techniques
Large glenoid defects pose problems in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Bone-grafting enables restoration of the glenoid, but outcomes of this procedure may be hampered by early instability, which can lead to implant malpositioning, and by graft resorption, which can lead to implant loosening. To combat these potential complications, we utilize multiple bioresorbable pinning (MBP) during the bone-grafting process, in which as many bioresorbable pins as required are inserted from whatever aspect of the graft is appropriate until initial stability of the graft is achieved. We retrospectively compared the various grafting techniques applied for various degrees of retroversion, concluding that MBP is better when retroversion is >30°. Treatment decisions are made according to the degree of preoperative retroversion. The MBS technique is indicated for type-2 and type-3 glenoid deformities. This technique is not only relatively safe-as it involves only the use of bioresorbable materials-but also yields improved graft incorporation and less glenoid loosening. Description:This procedure is performed with the patient under general anesthesia and in the beach-chair position, via a deltopectoral approach. After placing the structural graft, 5 to 10 provisional 1.5-mm Kirschner wires are inserted through the graft up the medal cortical bone of the scapula. The Kirschner wires are subsequently replaced with bioresorbable (BR) pins (1.5-mm Fixsorb Pin; TEIJIN). If more wires are needed, another set of 4 to 5 RB pins is inserted to gain initial stability. After placing the graft, the glenoid component is implanted as usual. Alternatives:Traditionally, 1 or 2 screws are inserted in the periphery of the graft to obtain stability. The screws either must be inserted at an angle that does not impede placement of the implant or are removed before the placement of the glenoid implant. One or a maximum of 2 long screws are inserted through the graft and glenoid, meaning that the screw(s) must be aimed at a very narrow space between the central post and screws. Otherwise, these screws will represent an obstacle to the placement of the glenoid implant. Rationale:In addition to facilitating initial graft stability, this procedure promotes graft incorporation. Typically, when performing this procedure, a total of 15 to 20 temporary Kirschner wires are placed in sets, with 5 to 7 wires per set. Of these, the most stable wires, usually 8 to 10 in total, are replaced by BR pins. The resultant bone holes, whether filled or unfilled with the BR pins, may promote neovascularization and osteoinduction, enabling long-lasting remodeling of and improved incorporation of the bone graft. Expected Outcomes:A prior study compared the use of MBP versus angulated bony-increased offset (BIO) graft, assessing graft incorporation according to the size of the remaining graft on axial radiographs, with full incorporation defined as >75% of the original graft size. In that study, all 13 patients in the MBP group showed full graft incorporation compared with only 9 (47%) of 19 patients in the angulated BIO group (p < 0.001). Important Tips:Expose all 4 quadrants of the glenoid in cases of type-2 deformity. Accurate orientation of the MBP is important.Expose the upper and lower 2 quadrants of the glenoid in cases of type-3 deformity. The bases of the scapular spine and axillary border serve as a graft scaffold.Preserve circumferential soft tissues in cases of type-3 deformity because these tissues will serve to contain cancellous bone graft.Keep the Kirschner wire that extends the most medially (reaching the most medial cortical bone of the scapula) as a future guidewire for drilling of the central peg hole. Acronyms and Abbreviations:RSA = reverse shoulder arthroplastyMBP = multiple bioresorbable pinningBIO = bony-increased offsetBR = bioresorbableTSA = total shoulder arthroplastyCT = computed tomographyK-wire = Kirschner wireROM = range of motionP.O. = postoperative.
10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00052
Glenoid bone grafting in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for long-standing anterior shoulder dislocation.
Werner Birgit S,Böhm Dorota,Abdelkawi Ayman,Gohlke Frank
Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
BACKGROUND:Long-standing anterior glenohumeral dislocation results in both humeral and glenoid bone loss, as well as concomitant soft tissue pathologies. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is an established procedure to restore both stability and function in cuff-deficient shoulders. However, fixation of the glenoid component is prone to failure in cases of advanced glenoid vault destruction and requires substantial bone graft. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of glenoid bone grafting in RSA for neglected anterior dislocation with significant glenoid bone loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS:We reviewed 21 of 32 patients after 1-staged RSA and glenoid bone grafting with resected humeral head, with a mean follow-up period of 4.9 years (range, 2-10 years). The mean age at the time of surgery was 71 years (range, 50-85 years). Glenoid bone loss averaged 45% of glenoid width according to preoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans. A long-pegged glenoid baseplate was used in 9 patients. RESULTS:The mean Constant score improved from 5.7 points (range, 0-22 points) preoperatively to 57.2 points (range, 26-79 points) postoperatively (P < .001). Two patients required revision because of baseplate loosening: one patient underwent conversion to a hemiarthroplasty, and the other patient underwent a 2-staged reconstruction with tricortical iliac crest bone graft. CONCLUSION:RSA in neglected anterior dislocation is a successful treatment option even in the case of advanced glenoid bone loss. To maintain stable fixation of the glenoid component, comprehensive preoperative analysis of the remaining bone stock based on 3-dimensional computed tomography scans should be included, with particular attention to ensure optimal anchorage length of the baseplate's central peg in the native glenoid bone stock.
10.1016/j.jse.2014.02.017
Glenoid Bone-Grafting in Revision to a Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Surgical Technique.
Wagner Eric,Houdek Matthew T,Elhassan Bassem T,Sanchez-Sotelo Joaquin,Sperling John W,Cofield Robert H
JBJS essential surgical techniques
INTRODUCTION:Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has emerged as a very good treatment option for patients in salvage situations, such as the revision setting with glenoid bone loss. INDICATIONS & CONTRAINDICATIONS: STEP 1 PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION AND PLANNING:For patients undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty, perform the preoperative evaluation with radiographs, computed tomography (CT), and digital templating software as they play a key role (Video 1). STEP 2 SURGICAL APPROACH AND HUMERAL COMPONENT MANAGEMENT:Perform all operations with the patient in the beach-chair position. STEP 3 GLENOID COMPONENT REMOVAL AND PREPARATION:Glenoid exposure is the key to the operation. STEP 4 ASSESSMENT OF GLENOID BONE STOCK AND BONE-GRAFTING ALGORITHM:Use bone graft if the glenoid is thought to be inadequate for stable fixation in an acceptable position. STEP 5-A MANAGE A PERIPHERAL DEFECT WITH ≥50% IMPLANT-BONE CONTACT WITH A STRUCTURAL ALLOGRAFT OR HUMERAL AUTOGRAFT:When a peripheral defect contributes to either glenoid anteversion (anterior) or retroversion (posterior), but the implant has ≥50% contact with the native bone, consider using a structural autograft from the local humerus (preferred), if available, or a structural allograft (Video 1). STEP 5-B MANAGE A PERIPHERAL DEFECT WITH <50% IMPLANT-BONE CONTACT WITH A STRUCTURAL AUTOGRAFT FROM THE ILIAC CREST OR PROXIMAL PART OF THE HUMERUS:In shoulders with a peripheral defect with <50% contact with the native glenoid and substantial alterations in glenoid version, consider using a structural autograft from the proximal part of the humerus (preferred), if available, or the iliac crest (Figs. 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, and 3; Video 1). STEP 5-C MANAGE A CENTRAL DEFECT WITH ≥30% IMPLANT-BONE CONTACT WITH MORSELIZED BONE-GRAFTING ALLOGRAFT OR AUTOGRAFT:In shoulders with a central defect with ≥30% contact between the baseplate and the native glenoid, with adequate primary stability of the central screw and/or peg, use morselized local autograft (preferred), if available, or corticocancellous allograft, to restore the lateral offset of the native glenoid and implant-bone contact area. STEP 5-D MANAGE A CENTRAL GLOBAL DEFECT WITH <30% IMPLANT-BONE CONTACT WITH A STRUCTURAL AUTOGRAFT FROM THE ILIAC CREST OR PROXIMAL PART OF THE HUMERUS:As a large central or global deficiency can lead to excessive glenoid medialization (Figs. 4-A, 4-B, and 4-C), use a structural tricortical autograft from the iliac crest to restore glenoid structure and support implantation, as well as increase the offset of the glenoid component, enhancing stability and potentially reducing the risk of scapular notching. STEP 5-E MANAGE A SUPERIOR DEFECT WITH <50% IMPLANT-BONE CONTACT AND LOSS OF TILT WITH A STRUCTURAL AUTOGRAFT FROM THE ILIAC CREST OR PROXIMAL PART OF THE HUMERUS:For a superior deficiency with <50% contact between the implant and the native bone and a loss of neutral tilt, avoid superior tilt as it is critical to obtain either neutral or inferior tilt of the glenoid (keep this in mind when placing the central cannulated Kirschner wire for drilling the central screw) and use structural autograft for larger defects to prevent superior tilt, with the source of the graft preferentially from the humeral neck resection; however, if there is not adequate proximal humeral bone, a tricortical graft from the ipsilateral iliac crest can be used. STEP 6 PLACEMENT OF BASEPLATE SCREWS AND GLENOSPHERE AND IMPLANTATION OF THE HUMERAL COMPONENT: STEP 7 POSTOPERATIVE CARE: RESULTS:In our practice, glenoid bone-grafting was performed in 29% of the 143 shoulders revised using reverse components. PITFALLS & CHALLENGES:
10.2106/JBJS.ST.15.00023
Structural glenoid grafting during primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using humeral head autograft.
Tashjian Robert Z,Granger Erin,Chalmers Peter N
Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
BACKGROUND:Large glenoid bone defects in the setting of glenohumeral arthritis can present a challenge to the shoulder arthroplasty surgeon. The results of large structural autografting at the time of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) are relatively unknown. METHODS:This retrospective case series describes the clinical and radiographic results of large structural autografting from the humeral head to the glenoid during primary RTSA. RESULTS:Of 17 patients who met inclusion criteria, 14 (82% follow-up) were evaluated postoperatively at a mean of 2.6 years (range, 2.0-5.4 years). Mean inclination correction was 19° ± 12° (range, 3°-35°). Complications occurred in 3 patients, including 1 transient brachial plexus palsy, 1 loose baseplate, and 1 dislocation treated with closed reduction. Radiographic images showed 100% of grafts incorporated. Active forward elevation improved from 80° ± 40° to 130° ± 49° (P = .028). The visual analog scale score for pain improved from 8.1 ± 1.3 to 2.5 ± 3.1 (P = .005). The Simple Shoulder Test improved from 1.8 ± 1.1 to 6.5 ± 4 (P = .012). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score improved from 22 ± 10 to 66 ± 25 (P = .012). All patients (100%) were satisfied, and all patients (93%) but 1 stated that they would undergo the procedure again if given the chance. CONCLUSIONS:RTSA incorporating structural grafting of the glenoid with humeral head autograft results in significant improvements in active forward elevation, pain, and function, with a low complication rate. This technique can reliably be used to achieve correction of large (up to 35°) glenoid defects with a 93% chance of baseplate survival and a 100% chance of graft incorporation in the short-term.
10.1016/j.jse.2017.07.010
Computed tomographic evaluation of glenoid joint line restoration with glenoid bone grafting and reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with significant glenoid bone loss.
Italia Kristine R,Green Nicholas,Maharaj Jashint,Launay Marine,Gupta Ashish
Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
BACKGROUND:Restoration of native glenohumeral joint line is important for a successful outcome after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The aims of this study were to quantify the restoration of glenoid joint line after structural bone grafting and RSA, and to evaluate graft incorporation, correction of glenoid version, and rate of notching. METHODS:This is a retrospective review of 21 patients who underwent RSA (20 primary, 1 revision) with glenoid bone grafting (15 autografts, 6 allografts). Grammont design implants and baseplate with long peg were used in all patients. Preoperative and postoperative 3D models were created using MIMICS 21.0. Preoperative defects were classified, and postoperative joint line restoration was assessed based on the lateral aspect of the base of the coracoid. Postoperative computed tomographic (CT) scans were evaluated for graft incorporation, version correction, and presence of notching. RESULTS:Preoperative glenoid defects were classified as massive (5%), large (29%), moderate (52%), and small (14%). The average preoperative version was 8° of retroversion. The average postoperative version was 5° of retroversion. The average preoperative medialization was noted to be 8.4 mm medial to native joint line or 0.6 mm (range -16.8 to 13.2) lateral to the coracoid base. The postoperative CT scans demonstrated a mean joint line at 12.1 mm (range 1.3-22.4) lateral to the coracoid base. At the 3-month follow-up, all patients demonstrated graft incorporation on CT scans. Graft osteolysis was observed on CT scan in 4.8% of patients at a mean follow-up of 19.5 months. DISCUSSION:Structural bone grafting of glenoid defect effectively re-creates the glenoid anatomy, restores glenoid bone stock, re-creates the true glenohumeral joint line, and corrects glenoid deformity. The use of bone grafting also allows lateralization of the baseplate and glenosphere, reducing the risk of severe scapular notching. CONCLUSION:Restoration of the glenoid joint line was achieved in all patients. Glenoid bone grafting is a viable option for restoring glenoid joint line in cases of significant glenoid defects encountered during RSA.
10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.031
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Baseplate Stability in Superior Bone Loss With Augmented Implant.
Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty
BACKGROUND:Glenoid bone loss is commonly encountered in cases of rotator cuff tear arthropathy and can create challenges during reverse shoulder arthroplasty. In this study, we sought to investigate the biomechanical properties of a new treatment option for superior glenoid defect, an augmented reverse total shoulder baseplate. METHODS:Three conditions were examined: non-augmented baseplate without defect, non-augmented baseplate with defect, and augmented baseplate with defect. The augmented baseplates included a 30-degree half wedge which also matched the created superior defect. The samples were cyclically loaded at a 60 simulated abduction angle to mimic baseplate loosening. The migration and micromotion of the baseplate were measured on the superior edge using a 3D Digital Image Correlation System. RESULTS:The migration measured in the augmented baseplate showed no significant difference when compared to the no defect or defect cases. In terms of micromotion, the augmented baseplate showed values that were between the micromotions reported for the no defect and defect conditions, but not by a statistically significant amount. CONCLUSION:This study provides biomechanical evidence that augmented baseplates can reduce the amount of micromotion experienced by the RSA construct in the presence of significant superior glenoid bone deficiency, but do not fully restore stability to that of a full contact non-augmented baseplate.
10.1177/24715492211020689
A novel method for localization of the maximum glenoid bone defect during reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
JSES international
BACKGROUND:Management of glenoid bone defects during reverse shoulder arthroplasty remains a challenge. The aim of our study was to preoperatively localize the maximal depth of glenoid bone defects in relation to glenoid reaming. METHODS:Thirty preoperative shoulder computed tomography scans were collected. Three assessors created standardized surgical plans, using 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography-based Blueprint planning software in which the reaming axis was held constant at zero degrees of version and inclination. Each plan resulted in a 2-dimensional (2D) image of the reamer's contact on the glenoid and a corresponding 3D representation of the glenoid bone defect. The position of the maximum glenoid defect was localized on both the 2D and 3D images. Descriptive statistics were calculated. The correlation between angles from 2D and 3D images was assessed, and intraclass correlation was used to assess inter-rater and intrarater reliability. RESULTS:Twenty-eight patients were included. The overall mean difference between 2D and 3D angles was 5.4° (standard deviation 5.2°). The correlation between 2D and 3D angles was almost perfect. Intraclass correlation results demonstrated near-perfect agreement. The maximal glenoid defect was within 5% of a circle (or +/- 9°) from perpendicular to the high-side ream line in 85.1% of comparisons and was within 10% of a circle in 97.6% of comparisons. CONCLUSION:Using Blueprint planning software, we have demonstrated with almost perfect agreement among 3 assessors that when the reaming axis is held constant, the maximum glenoid bone defect is reliably located perpendicular to the glenoid ream line.
10.1016/j.jseint.2021.04.001
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with structural bone grafting of large glenoid defects.
Jones Richard B,Wright Thomas W,Zuckerman Joseph D
Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
BACKGROUND:Large glenoid defects pose difficulties in shoulder arthroplasty. Structural grafts consisting of a humeral head autograft, iliac crest, and allograft have been described. Few series describe grafts used with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed patients who had undergone primary or revision RTSA. We identified 44 patients (20 men and 24 women; mean age, 69 years) as having a bulk structural graft to the glenoid behind the baseplate. The grafts consisted of a humeral head autograft in 29, iliac crest autograft in 1, or femoral head allograft in 14. Range of motion data, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, simple shoulder test, shoulder pain and disability index, and Constant scores were obtained from preoperative and the latest follow-up visits. Radiographs were reviewed from the initial postoperative visit and the latest follow-up. The grafting cohort was compared with an age- and sex-matched cohort of RTSA patients without glenoid grafting. RESULTS:Improvements were seen in the functional outcome scores at the latest follow-up. No significant differences were found in the preoperative or postoperative data between allografts and autografts. Postoperative scores for the bone graft cohort were significantly lower than those in the cohort without grafting. Complete or partial incorporation was shown radiographically in 81% of grafts. Six baseplates were considered loose. Complications included 2 infections, 1 dislocation, 1 humeral loosening, and 2 instances of clinical aseptic baseplate loosening. Six patients showed mild scapular notching. CONCLUSIONS:The use of bulk structural grafts is a promising treatment option. Allografts may yield equally acceptable results compared with autografts.
10.1016/j.jse.2016.01.016
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty baseplate stability with locking vs. non-locking peripheral screws.
Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)
BACKGROUND:There are many options for glenosphere baseplate fixation commercially available, yet there is little biomechanical evidence supporting one type of fixation over another. In this study, we compared the biomechanical fixation of a reverse total shoulder glenoid baseplate secured with locking or non-locking peripheral screws. METHODS:Both a non-augmented mini baseplate with full backing support and an augmented baseplate were testing after implantation in solid rigid polyurethane foam. Each baseplate was implanted with a 30 mm central compression screw and four peripheral screws, either locking or non-locking (15 mm anterior/posterior and 30 mm superior/inferior). A 1 Hz cyclic force of 0-750 N was applied at a 60 angle for 5000 cycles. Throughout the test, the displacement of the baseplate was measured using a 3D Digital Image Correlation System. FINDINGS:The amount of migration measured in the both the non-augmented and augment cases shows no significant differences between locking and non-locking cases at the final cycle count (non-augment: 5.66 +/- 2.29 μm vs. 3.71 +/- 1.23 μm; p = 0.095, augment: 15.43 +/- 8.49 μm vs. 12.46 +/- 3.24 μm; p = 0.314). Additionally, the amount of micromotion measured for both sample types shows the same lack of significant difference (non-augment: 10.79 +/- 5.22 μm vs. 10.16 +/- 7.61 μm; p = 0.388, augment: 55.03 +/- 10.13 μm vs. 54.84 +/- 10.65 μm; p = 0.968). INTERPRETATION:The presence of locking versus non-locking peripheral screws does not make a significant difference on the overall stability of a glenoid baseplate, in both a no defect case with a non-augmented baseplate and a bone defect case with an augmented baseplate.
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105665
Addressing glenoid bone deficiency and asymmetric posterior erosion in shoulder arthroplasty.
Hsu Jason E,Ricchetti Eric T,Huffman G Russell,Iannotti Joseph P,Glaser David L
Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
Glenoid bone deficiency and eccentric posterior wear are difficult problems faced by shoulder arthroplasty surgeons. Numerous options and techniques exist for addressing these issues. Hemiarthroplasty with concentric glenoid reaming may be a viable alternative in motivated patients in whom glenoid component failure is a concern. Total shoulder arthroplasty has been shown to provide durable pain relief and excellent function in patients, and numerous methods and techniques can assist in addressing bone loss and eccentric wear. However, the ideal amount of version correction in cases of severe retroversion has not yet been established. Asymmetric reaming is a commonly used technique to address glenoid version, but correction of severe retroversion may compromise bone stock and component fixation. Bone grafting is a technically demanding alternative for uncontained defects and has mixed clinical results. Specialized glenoid implants with posterior augmentation have been created to assist the surgeon in correcting glenoid version without compromising bone stock, but clinical data on these implants are still pending. Custom implants or instruments based on each patient's unique glenoid anatomy may hold promise. In elderly, sedentary patients in whom bone stock and soft-tissue balance are concerns, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty may be less technically demanding while still providing satisfactory pain relief and functional improvements.
10.1016/j.jse.2013.04.014
Structural glenoid allograft reconstruction during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Tashjian Robert Z,Broschinsky Kortnie,Stertz Irene,Chalmers Peter N
Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
BACKGROUND:Large glenoid defects present a challenge during primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) especially when humeral head autograft is not available as a bone graft source. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of RTSA with concomitant structural allografting to reconstruct large glenoid defects. METHODS:From May 2008 to July 2016, 22 patients underwent primary or revision RTSA with structural glenoid allografting. Of 22 patients, 19 (86%) were available for a minimum 2-year clinical follow-up (average, 2.8 ± 1.3 years), and 17 of 22 (77%) were available for a minimum 1-year radiographic follow-up. Functional outcomes, range of motion, radiographic deformity correction, allograft incorporation, and complication rates were determined. RESULTS:From preoperatively to postoperatively, significant improvements in the average Simple Shoulder Test score (2 ± 2 preoperatively vs. 10 ± 8 postoperatively, P = .002), the average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (31 ± 19 preoperatively vs. 70 ± 25 postoperatively, P < .001), and average active forward elevation (71° ± 41° preoperatively vs. 128° ± 28° postoperatively, P < .001) were noted. Coronal-plane radiographic correction was 29° ± 12° as measured with the reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle (P < .001) and 14° ± 11° as measured with the β angle (P < .001). Postoperatively, of 17 patients with a minimum 1-year radiographic follow-up, 14 (82%) had complete radiographic incorporation of the graft. Acromial fracture nonunions developed in 2 patients and loosening and migration of the baseplate were found in 2 patients, although no patients elected to undergo further surgery. CONCLUSIONS:RTSA with allograft reconstruction of severe glenoid defects allows restoration of glenoid anatomy and leads to high rates of bony incorporation with low rates of glenoid loosening or requirement for revision. Structural allograft is an excellent alternative to autograft in revision RTSA to avoid graft-site morbidity.
10.1016/j.jse.2019.07.011
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty due to glenoid bone defects.
Díaz Miñarro J C,Izquierdo Fernández A,Muñoz Reyes F,Carpintero Lluch R,Uceda Carrascosa P,Muñoz Luna F,López Jordán A,Carpintero Benítez P
Revista espanola de cirugia ortopedica y traumatologia
OBJECTIVE:Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is becoming a useful tool for many diseases of the shoulder. Any severe glenoid bone defect may affect the fixing of the glenoid component. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the medium-term outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty associated with a glenoplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A retrospective study was conducted on 5 patients from our hospital, selected due to glenoid defects of different etiology. All of them where treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty associated with glenoplasty with bone graft. RESULTS:The minimum follow-up was one year (mean 30.4 months). All grafts were radiologically integrated, with no signs of resorption or necrosis being observed. At 12 months, the Constant score was 66.75 and the mean EVA score was 1. DISCUSSION:Glenoplasty surgery is technically demanding for restoring original bone size in patients with glenoid structural defects, enabling a reverse shoulder arthroplasty to be implanted. Thus improving both the function and clinical outcomes in selected patients with glenohumeral pathology and providing them with a solution.
10.1016/j.recot.2014.10.001
Management of Humeral and Glenoid Bone Defects in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Friedman Lisa G M,Garrigues Grant E
The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Bone loss of either the glenoid or the humerus is a challenging problem in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. When left unaddressed, it can lead to early failure of the implant and poor outcomes. Humeral bone loss can be addressed with the use of an endoprosthesis or allograft prosthetic implant. Glenoid bone loss can be treated with a variety of grafting options, such as augmented implants, patient-specific navigation, and implantation systems.
10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00964
Management of glenoid bone loss with impaction and structural bone grafting in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Musculoskeletal surgery
INTRODUCTION:Glenoid bone loss is a commonly encountered problem in complex primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty. Addressing glenoid bone loss is critical to avoid complications like early loosening, impingement, notching and instability. A large number of techniques like bone grafting using autograft or allograft, eccentric reaming, augmented base plates, patient-specific instrumentations and custom-made implants are available to tackle bone loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS:We prospectively collected the data of all patients with glenoid defects undergoing primary or revision reverse shoulder replacement between 2004 and 2017. This included demographic data, ranges of motion, Constant-Murley score and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV). A pre-operative CT scan was done as well to plan the surgery and calculate the glenoid version. At each follow-up, the clinical function and shoulder scores were assessed. Additionally, the radiographs were assessed for graft incorporation, evidence of lysis and calculation of glenoid version. RESULTS:Between 2004 and 2017, 37 patients underwent glenoid bone grafting during reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Average age was 72 years (range 46-88). Indications for surgery were cuff tear arthropathy (6 patients); revision of failed other prosthesis (23); primary osteoarthritis (4); rheumatoid arthritis (3); and second-stage revision for infection (1). The glenoid defect was contained in 24 patients, and therefore, impaction graft with a combination of bone graft substitute and/or humeral head autograft was performed. In 13 patients the glenoid defect was severe and uncontainable and therefore a graft-implant composite glenoid was implanted using humeral head autograft or allograft. Average follow-up was 3.6 years (range 1-10). Mean Constant score improved from 34 before surgery to 63 after surgery. Mean SSV score improved from 0.9/10 to 8.3/10. Active movements improved significantly with forward elevation increasing from 54° to 123°; abduction from 48° to 123°; external rotation from 24° to 38°; internal rotation from 57° to 70°. Radiographs at final follow-up showed no radiolucencies around the glenoid component and no evidence of loosening of the implant. In 2 cases there was a grade I notching. There was 100% survivorship at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION:Impaction bone grafting along with structural grafting when required is an effective and reproducible way of managing severe glenoid bone loss. This technique gives consistent and good clinical and radiological results.
10.1007/s12306-022-00747-w
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with and without baseplate wedge augmentation in the setting of glenoid deformity and rotator cuff deficiency-a multicenter investigation.
Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
INTRODUCTION:Glenoid baseplate augments have recently been introduced as a way of managing glenoid monoplanar or biplanar abnormalities in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the difference in clinical outcomes, complications, and revision rates between augmented and standard baseplates in RSA for rotator cuff arthropathy patients with glenoid deformity. METHODS:A multicenter retrospective analysis of 171 patients with glenoid bone loss who underwent RSA with and without augmented baseplates was performed. Preoperative inclusion criteria included minimum follow-up of 2 years and preoperative retroversion of 15°-30° and/or a beta angle 70°-80°. Version and beta angle were measured on computed tomographic scans, when available, and plain radiographs. Shoulder range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcomes were obtained from preoperative and multiple postoperative time points. RESULTS:The study consisted of 84 standard baseplate patients and 87 augmented baseplate patients. The augment cohort had greater mean preoperative glenoid retroversion (17° vs. 9°, P < .001). At >5-year follow-up, the increase in postoperative active abduction (52° vs. 31°, P = .023), forward flexion (58° vs. 35°, P = .020), and internal rotation score (2.8° vs. 1.1°, P = .001) was significantly greater in the augment cohort. Additionally, >5-year follow-up American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form score (87.0 ± 16.6 vs. 75.9 ± 22.4, P = .022), Constant score (78.0 ± 9.7 vs. 64.6 ± 15.1, P < .001), and Shoulder Arthroplasty Smart score (81.2 ± 6.5 vs. 71.2 ± 13.6, P = .003) were significantly higher in the augment cohort. Revision rate was low overall, with no difference between the augment and no augment groups (0.7% vs. 3.0%, P = .151). CONCLUSION:In comparing augments to standard nonaugment baseplates in the setting of RSA with glenoid deformity, our results demonstrate greater postoperative improvements in multiple planes of active ROM in the augment cohort. Additionally, the augment cohort demonstrated greater postoperative level and improvement in scores for multiple clinical outcome metrics up to >5 years of follow-up with no difference in complication or revision rates, supporting the use of augmented glenoid baseplates in RSA with glenoid deformity.
10.1016/j.jse.2022.04.025
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty with Bony and Metallic versus Standard Bony Reconstruction for Severe Glenoid Bone Loss. A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.
Nabergoj Marko,Neyton Lionel,Bothorel Hugo,Ho Sean W L,Wang Sidi,Chong Xue Ling,Lädermann Alexandre
Journal of clinical medicine
There are different techniques to address severe glenoid erosion during reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This study assessed the clinical and radiological outcomes of RSA with combined bony and metallic augment (BMA) glenoid reconstruction compared to bony augmentation (BA) alone. A review of patients who underwent RSA with severe glenoid bone loss requiring reconstruction from January 2017 to January 2019 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: BMA versus BA alone. Clinical outcome measurements included two years postoperative ROM, Constant score, subjective shoulder value (SSV), and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (ASES) score. Radiological outcomes included radiographic evidence of scapular complications and graft incorporation. The BMA group had significantly different glenoid morphology ( < 0.001) and greater bone loss thickness than the BA group (16.3 ± 3.8 mm vs. 12.0 ± 0.0 mm, = 0.020). Both groups had significantly improved ROM (anterior forward flexion and external rotation) and clinical scores (Constant, SSV and ASES scores) at 2 years. Greater improvement was observed in the BMA group in terms of anterior forward flexion (86.3° ± 27.9° vs. 43.8° ± 25.6°, = 0.013) and Constant score (56.6 ± 10.1 vs. 38.3 ± 16.7, = 0.021). The BA group demonstrated greater functional and clinical improvements with higher postoperative active external rotation and ASES results (active external rotation, 49.4° ± 17.0° vs. 29.4° ± 14.7°, = 0.017; ASES, 89.1 ± 11.3 vs. 76.8 ± 11.0, = 0.045). The combination use of bone graft and metallic augments in severe glenoid bone loss during RSA is safe and effective and can be considered in cases of severe glenoid bone loss where bone graft alone may be insufficient.
10.3390/jcm10225274
Total reverse arthroplasty of the shoulder and structural bone graft in glenoid defects: Short-term results.
Revista espanola de cirugia ortopedica y traumatologia
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the clinical and radiological results of a series of patients with a glenoid bone defect treated by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty associated with a bone graft stabilized with a trabecular titanium glenoid component (Axioma SMR Lima®). MATERIAL AND METHODS:Retrospective descriptive study of 16 consecutive patients with an average age of 68.2years. In 13 cases they were primary arthroplasties and in 3 revision ones. The data included in the study were obtained by reviewing the clinical history. The glenoid defect was classified according to Gupta et al. The pre- and postoperative clinical assessment included the score on the visual analogue pain scale (VAS), the result of the Constant score and the active joint balance. Radiographically, the integration of the bone graft and the fixation of the components were assessed. RESULTS:The average follow-up was 42.1months. The average VAS score improved from 7.5 preoperative points to 2.5 points in the last control (P=.006) and on the Constant score from 35.8 pre-surgical points to 64.4 points (P=.001). The average joint balance went from 54° of abduction, 54° of antepulsion, 24° of external rotation and internal rotation to preoperative trochanter to 120° of abduction (P=.001), 124° of antepulsion (P=.001), 63° of external rotation (P=0.001) and internal rotation at L5 in the last clinical control. In all patients, graft integration and the absence of component loosening were observed. The incidence of complications was 6.2%. DISCUSSION:The treatment of glenoid defects by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and a bone graft stabilized by trabecular titanium metaglene presents good clinical and radiological results and a low rate of short-term complications.
10.1016/j.recot.2021.09.002