Improving Image Quality and Nodule Characterization in Ultra-low-dose Lung CT with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction.
Academic radiology
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE:To investigate the influence of the deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) on the image quality and quantitative analysis of pulmonary nodules under ultra-low dose lung CT conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS:This was a prospective study with patient consent and included 56 patients with suspected pulmonary nodules. Patients were examined by both standard-dose CT (SDCT) and ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT). SDCT images were reconstructed with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V 40% (ASIR-V40%) (group A), while ULDCT images were reconstructed using ASIR-V40% (group B) and high-strength DLIR (DLIR-H) (group C). The three image sets were analyzed using a commercial computer aided diagnosis (CAD) software. Parameters such as nodule length, width, density, volume, risk, and classification were measured. The CAD quantitative data of different nodule types (solid, calcified, and subsolid nodules) and nodule image quality scores evaluated by two physicians on a 5-point scale were compared. RESULT:The radiation dose in ULDCT was 0.25 ± 0.08mSv, 7.2% that of the 3.48 ± 1.08mSv in SDCT (P < 0.001). 104 pulmonary nodules were detected (51/53 solid, 26/24 calcified and 27/27 subsolid in Groups A and (B&C), respectively). Group B had lower density for solid, calcified nodules, and lower volume and risk for subsolid nodules than Group A, while Group C had lower density for calcified nodules (P < 0.05), There were no significant differences in other parameters among the three groups (P > 0.05). Group A and C had similar image quality for nodules and were higher than Group B (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION:DLIR-H significantly improves image quality than ASIR-V40% and maintains similar nodule detection and characterization with CAD in ULDCT compared to SDCT.
10.1016/j.acra.2024.01.010
Differentiating the Invasiveness of Lung Adenocarcinoma Manifesting as Ground Glass Nodules: Combination of Dual-energy CT Parameters and Quantitative-semantic Features.
Academic radiology
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT (DECT) parameters and quantitative-semantic features for differentiating the invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as ground glass nodules (GGNs). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Between June 2022 and September 2023, 69 patients with 74 surgically resected GGNs who underwent DECT examinations were included. CT numbers on virtual monochromatic images were calculated at 40-130 keV generated from DECT. Quantitative morphological measurements and semantic features were evaluated on unenhanced CT images and compared between pathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)-minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and invasive lung adenocarcinoma (IAC). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors. The diagnostic performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared using DeLong's test. RESULTS:Monochromatic CT numbers at 40-130 keV were significantly higher in IAC than in AIS-MIA (all P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that CT number of 130 keV (odds ratio [OR] = 1.02, P = 0.013), maximum cross-sectional long diameter (OR =1.40, P = 0.014), deep or moderate lobulation sign (OR =19.88, P = 0.005), and abnormal intranodular vessel morphology (OR = 25.57, P = 0.017) were independent predictors of IAC. The combined prediction model showed a favorable differentiation performance with an AUC of 0.966 (95.2% sensitivity, 94.3% specificity, 94.8% accuracy), which was significantly higher than that for each risk factor (AUC = 0.791-0.822, all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION:A multi-parameter combined prediction model integrating monochromatic CT numbers from DECT and quantitative-semantic features is promising for the preoperative discrimination of IAC and AIS-MIA in GGN-predominant lung adenocarcinoma.
10.1016/j.acra.2024.02.011
Potential of Dual-Energy CT-Based Collagen Maps for the Assessment of Disk Degeneration in the Lumbar Spine.
Academic radiology
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES:Lumbar disk degeneration is a common condition contributing significantly to back pain. The objective of the study was to evaluate the potential of dual-energy CT (DECT)-derived collagen maps for the assessment of lumbar disk degeneration. PATIENTS AND METHODS:We conducted a retrospective analysis of 127 patients who underwent dual-source DECT and MRI of the lumbar spine between 07/2019 and 10/2022. The level of lumbar disk degeneration was categorized by three radiologists as follows: no/mild (Pfirrmann 1&2), moderate (Pfirrmann 3&4), and severe (Pfirrmann 5). Recall (sensitivity) and accuracy of DECT collagen maps were calculated. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate inter-reader reliability. Subjective evaluations were performed using 5-point Likert scales for diagnostic confidence and image quality. RESULTS:We evaluated a total of 762 intervertebral disks from 127 patients (median age, 69.7 (range, 23.0-93.7), female, 56). MRI identified 230 non/mildly degenerated disks (30.2%), 484 moderately degenerated disks (63.5%), and 48 severely degenerated disks (6.3%). DECT collagen maps yielded an overall accuracy of 85.5% (1955/2286). Recall (sensitivity) was 79.3% (547/690) for the detection of no/mild lumbar disk degeneration, 88.7% (1288/1452) for the detection of moderate disk degeneration, and 83.3% (120/144) for the detection of severe disk degeneration (ICC=0.9). Subjective evaluations of DECT collagen maps showed high diagnostic confidence (median 4) and good image quality (median 4). CONCLUSION:The use of DECT collagen maps to distinguish different stages of lumbar disk degeneration may have clinical significance in the early diagnosis of disk-related pathologies in patients with contraindications for MRI or in cases of unavailability of MRI.
10.1016/j.acra.2024.02.036
Evaluation of a Tube Voltage-Based Contrast Media Adaptation in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Using Personalized Triphasic Injection Protocols: A Matched Case-Control Study.
Academic radiology
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES:Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has recently been established as a first-line test in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Due to the increased use of CCTA, strategies to reduce radiation and contrast medium (CM) exposure are of high importance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of automated tube voltage selection (ATVS)-adapted CM injection protocol for CCTA compared to a clinically established triphasic injection protocol in terms of image quality, radiation exposure, and CM administration MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients undergoing clinically indicated CCTA were prospectively enrolled from July 2021 to July 2023. Patients underwent CCTA using a modified triphasic CM injection protocol tailored to the tube voltage by the ATVS algorithm, in a range of 70 to 130 kV with a 10 kV interval. The injection protocol consisted of two phases of mixed CM and saline boluses with different proportions to assure a voltage-specific iodine delivery rate, followed by a third phase of saline flush. This cohort was compared to a control group identified retrospectively and scanned on the same CT system but with a standard triphasic CM protocol. Radiation and contrast dose, subjective and objective image quality (contrast-to-noise-ratio [CNR] and signal-to-noise-ratio [SNR]) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS:The final population consisted of 120 prospective patients matched with 120 retrospective controls, with 20 patients in each kV group. The 120 kV group was excluded from the statistical analysis due to insufficient sample size. A significant CM reduction was achieved in the prospective group overall (46.0 [IQR 37.0-52.0] vs. 51.3 [IQR 40.1-73.0] mL, p < 0.001) and at all kV levels too (all pairwise p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in radiation dose (6.13 ± 4.88 vs. 5.97 ± 5.51 mSv, p = 0.81), subjective image quality (median score of 4 [3-5] vs. 4 [3-5], p = 0.40), CNR, and SNR in the aorta and the left anterior descending coronary artery (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION:ATVS-adapted CM injection protocol allows for diagnostic quality CCTA with reduced CM volume while maintaining similar radiation exposure, subjective and objective image quality.
10.1016/j.acra.2024.04.039
Effect of arm position on image quality and radiation dose during thorax and abdomen computed tomography scans.
Radiography (London, England : 1995)
INTRODUCTION:During Computed Tomography (CT) scans of the Thorax-Abdomen-Pelvis (TAP) the patient's arms should be positioned above the head to obtain optimal image quality and expose the patient to the lowest possible radiation dose. This may be impossible with patients with shoulder problems leading to arms being positioned in other ways. This study aimed to investigate differences in objective image quality and estimated effective dose (E), when positioning the arms below shoulder level in CT-TAP. METHODS:An anthropomorphic phantom with cadaver arms was used. Four arm positions were tested: Along the torso (A), on the pelvis (B), on a pillow on the pelvis (C), and one arm on pillow on the pelvis and the other arm on the pelvis (D). A Siemens SOMATOM Definition Flash CT-scanner with CareDose 4D was used. The dose length product was read to estimate E. Image quality was assessed objectively by measuring noise within the region of interest in the liver and urinary bladder. RESULTS:Significant differences in E between all arm positions were seen (p = 0.005). The lowest E was obtained in position C, reducing E by 8.42%. Position A provided the best image quality but the highest E. CONCLUSION:This study showed no unequivocal optimal positioning of arms in CT-TAP. Position A provided the best object image quality, while position C yielded the lowest E. These results may impact the planning of diagnostic CT where positioning of arms may influence optimal image quality and radiation dose. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE:This study illustrates tendencies for objective image quality and E when arms are positioned below shoulder level. Further research is needed to assess the clinical relevance with the diagnostic potential.
10.1016/j.radi.2024.04.015
Verification of a simplified aneurysm dimensionless flow parameter to predict intracranial aneurysm rupture status.
The British journal of radiology
OBJECTIVES:Aneurysm number (An) is a novel prediction tool utilizing parameters of pulsatility index (PI) and aneurysm geometry. An has been shown to have the potential to differentiate intracranial aneurysm (IA) rupture status. The objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility and accuracy of An for IA rupture status prediction using Australian based clinical data. METHODS:A retrospective study was conducted across three tertiary referral hospitals between November 2017 and November 2020 and all saccular IAs with known rupture status were included. Two sets of An values were calculated based on two sets of PI values previously reported in the literature. RESULTS:Five hundred and four IA cases were included in this study. The results demonstrated no significant difference between ruptured and unruptured status when using An ≥1 as the discriminator. Further analysis showed no strong correlation between An and IA subtypes. The area under the curve (AUC) indicated poor performance in predicting rupture status (AUC1 = 0.55 and AUC2 = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS:This study does not support An ≥1 as a reliable parameter to predict the rupture status of IAs based on a retrospective cohort. Although the concept of An is supported by hemodynamic aneurysm theory, further research is needed before it can be applied in the clinical setting. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:This study demonstrates that the novel prediction tool, An, proposed in 2020 is not reliable and that further research of this hemodynamic model is needed before it can be incorporated into the prediction of IA rupture status.
10.1093/bjr/tqae106