The effect of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide versus busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning on relapse in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia evolving from myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.
The Lancet. Haematology
BACKGROUND:Relapse remains high in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome-refractory anaemia with excess blasts (RAEB) or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia evolving from myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). We aimed to investigate whether granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and decitabine plus busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning reduced relapse compared with busulfan-cyclophosphamide in this population. METHODS:We did an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial at six hospitals in China. Eligible patients (aged 14-65 years) had myelodysplastic syndrome-RAEB or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia evolving from myelodysplastic syndrome, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and HSCT comorbidity index of 0-2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning or busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning. Randomisation was done with permuted blocks (block size four) with no stratification and was implemented through an interactive web-based response system, which was independent of study site staff and investigators. G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning comprised G-CSF 5 μg/kg daily subcutaneously (days -17 to -10), decitabine 20 mg/m daily intravenously (days -14 to -10), busulfan 3·2 mg/kg daily intravenously (days -7 to -4), and cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg daily intravenously (days -3 and -2). Busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning comprised the same dose and duration of busulfan and cyclophosphamide. The primary endpoint was 2 year cumulative incidence of relapse. All efficacy and safety endpoints were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02744742; the trial is complete. FINDINGS:Between April 18, 2016, and Sept 30, 2019, 297 patients were screened for eligibility, 202 of whom were randomly assigned to G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide (n=101) or busulfan-cyclophosphamide (n=101) conditioning. 123 (61%) participants were male and 79 (31%) were female. Median follow-up was 32·4 months (IQR 10·0-43·0). The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 10·9% (95% CI 5·8-17·9) in the G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide group and 24·8% (16·8-33·5) in the busulfan-cyclophosphamide group (hazard ratio 0·39 [95% CI 0·19-0·79]; p=0·011). Within 100 days after transplantation, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events in the G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide group and the busulfan-cyclophosphamide group were infections (34 [34%] and 32 [32%]), acute graft-versus-host disease (30 [30%] and 30 [30%]), and gastrointestinal toxicity (28 [28%] and 29 [29%]). 11 (11%) patients in the G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide group and 13 (13%) in the busulfan-cyclophosphamide group died of adverse events. There were no treatment related deaths. INTERPRETATION:Our results suggest that G-CSF, decitabine, and busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning is a better choice than busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome-RAEB or secondary acute myeloid leukaemia evolving from myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing allogeneic HSCT. This conditioning could be a suitable therapuetic option for this patient population. FUNDING:None. TRANSLATION:For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00375-1
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients with acute myeloid leukemia not in remission.
Leukemia
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the last option for long-term survival for patients with chemotherapy-refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). By using the Japanese nationwide registry data, we analyzed 6927 adults with AML having undergone first allogeneic HCT while not in complete remission (CR) between 2001 and 2020. The 5-year overall survival (OS), relapse, and non-relapse mortality (NRM) rates were 23%, 53%, and 27%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified several factors predictive of OS mainly through their effects on relapse (cytogenetics, percentage of blasts in the peripheral blood, and transplantation year) and NRM (age, sex, and performance status). As regards disease status, relapsed disease was associated with a higher risk of overall mortality than primary induction failure (PIF). The shorter duration of the first CR increased the risks of relapse and overall mortality for the relapsed group, and the longer time from diagnosis to transplantation did so for the PIF group. Our experience compiled over the past two decades demonstrated that >20% of patients still enjoy long-term survival with allogeneic HCT performed during non-CR and identified those less likely to benefit from allogeneic HCT. Future efforts are needed to reduce the risk of posttransplant relapse in these patients.
10.1038/s41375-023-02119-0
CYAD-01, an autologous NKG2D-based CAR T-cell therapy, in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndromes or multiple myeloma (THINK): haematological cohorts of the dose escalation segment of a phase 1 trial.
The Lancet. Haematology
BACKGROUND:CYAD-01 is an autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product based on the natural killer (NK) group 2D (NKG2D) receptor, which binds eight ligands that are overexpressed in a wide range of haematological malignancies but are largely absent on non-neoplastic cells. Initial clinical evaluation of a single infusion of CYAD-01 at a low dose in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, and multiple myeloma supported the feasibility of the approach and prompted further evaluation of CYAD-01. The aim of the present study was to determine the safety and recommended phase 2 dosing of CYAD-01 administered without preconditioning or bridging chemotherapy. METHODS:The multicentre THINK study was an open-label, dose-escalation, phase 1 study for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, or multiple myeloma, after at least one previous line of therapy. Patients were recruited from five hospitals in the USA and Belgium. The dose-escalation segment evaluated three dose levels: 3 × 10 (dose level one), 1 × 10 (dose level two), and 3 × 10 (dose level three) cells per infusion with a 3 + 3 Fibonacci study design using a schedule of three infusions at 2-week intervals followed by potential consolidation treatment consisting of three additional infusions. The occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities post-CYAD-01 infusion was assessed as the primary endpoint in the total treated patient population. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03018405, and EudraCT, 2016-003312-12, and has been completed. FINDINGS:Between Feb 6, 2017, and Oct 9, 2018, 25 patients were registered in the haematological dose-escalation segment. Seven patients had manufacturing failure for insufficient yield and two had screening failure. 16 patients were treated with CYAD-01 (three with multiple myeloma and three with acute myeloid leukaemia at dose level one; three with acute myeloid leukaemia at dose level two; and six with acute myeloid leukaemia and one with myelodysplastic syndromes at dose level three). Median follow-up was 118 days (IQR 46-180). Seven patients (44%) had grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events. In total, five patients (31%) had grade 3 or 4 cytokine release syndrome across all dose levels. One dose-limiting toxicity of cytokine release syndrome was reported at dose level three. No treatment-related deaths occurred, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Three (25%) of 12 evaluable patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndromes had an objective response. Among responders, two patients with acute myeloid leukaemia proceeded to allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) after CYAD-01 treatment, with durable ongoing remissions (5 and 61 months). INTERPRETATION:Treatment with a multiple CYAD-01 infusion schedule without preconditioning is well tolerated and shows anti-leukaemic activity, although without durability outside of patients bridged to allogeneic HSCT. These phase 1 data support the proof-of-concept of targeting NKG2D ligands by CAR T-cell therapy. Further clinical studies with NKG2D-based CAR T-cells are warranted, potentially via combinatorial antigen targeted approaches, to improve anti-tumour activity. FUNDING:Celyad Oncology.
10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00378-7
Venetoclax Plus Gilteritinib for -Mutated Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
PURPOSE:The FMS-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor gilteritinib is standard therapy for relapsed/refractory -mutated () acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but seldom reduces burden or induces sustained efficacy. Gilteritinib combines synergistically with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax in preclinical models of AML. METHODS:This phase Ib open-label, dose-escalation/dose-expansion study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03625505) enrolled patients with wild-type and (escalation) or (expansion) relapsed/refractory AML. Patients received 400 mg oral venetoclax once daily and 80 mg or 120 mg oral gilteritinib once daily. The primary objectives were safety, identification of the recommended phase II dose, and the modified composite complete response (mCRc) rate (complete response [CR] + CR with incomplete blood count recovery + CR with incomplete platelet recovery + morphologic leukemia-free state) using ADMIRAL phase III-defined response criteria. RESULTS:Sixty-one patients were enrolled (n = 56 ); 64% (n = 36 of 56) of patients had received prior FLT3 inhibitor therapy. The recommended phase II dose was 400 mg venetoclax once daily and 120 mg gilteritinib once daily. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were cytopenias (n = 49; 80%). Adverse events prompted venetoclax and gilteritinib dose interruptions in 51% and 48%, respectively. The mCRc rate for patients was 75% (CR, 18%; CR with incomplete blood count recovery, 4%; CR with incomplete platelet recovery, 18%; and morphologic leukemia-free state, 36%) and was similar among patients with or without prior FLT3 inhibitor therapy (80% 67%, respectively). The median follow-up was 17.5 months. The median time to response was 0.9 months, and the median remission duration was 4.9 months (95% CI, 3.4 to 6.6). molecular response (< 10) was achieved in 60% of evaluable mCRc patients (n = 15 of 25). The median overall survival for patients was 10.0 months. CONCLUSION:The combination of venetoclax and gilteritinib was associated with high mCRc and molecular response rates regardless of prior FLT3 inhibitor exposure. Dose interruptions were needed to mitigate myelosuppression.
10.1200/JCO.22.00602
Phase I Results of Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal Inhibitor PLX51107 in Combination with Azacitidine in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Myeloid Malignancies.
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
PURPOSE:Treatment outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains dismal. On the basis of both extensive preclinical data and emerging clinical data, treatment with bromodomain and extra-terminal domain inhibitors (BETi) is a potential approach for patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS:We conducted a phase I trial to study the safety and efficacy of PLX51107 (BETi) and azacitidine combination therapy in patients with R/R AML and high-risk (HR) MDS and studied mechanisms of resistance to the combination therapy. RESULTS:Thirty-seven patients with HR R/R MDS (n = 4) and R/R AML (n = 33) were treated. Sixteen patients (43%) had MECOM gene rearrangement and 7 other patients had TP53 mutation. Median prior number of therapies was three (range 1-9); 97% had received prior hypomethylating agent and 84% prior venetoclax. Overall response rate was 8/37 (22%): complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (n = 1); morphologic leukemia-free state (n = 2); hematologic improvement (n = 5). The most common nonhematologic toxicities were febrile neutropenia and pneumonia in 12 (32%) patients each; 6 patients (17%) had severe hyperbilirubinemia. RNA-sequencing analysis of mononuclear cells harvested on treatment (day 3) versus pretreatment showed significant changes in mRNA expressions in responders: downregulation of MYC, BCL2, IL7R, and CDK6 and upregulation of HEXIM1, CD93, DCXR, and CDKN1A. Immunoblot analyses confirmed reduction in protein levels of c-Myc, CDK6, BCL2, and BCL-xL, and induction of BRD4 and HEXIM1 protein levels in responders. CONCLUSIONS:In a heavily pretreated patient cohort with R/R MDS and AML, PLX51107+ azacitidine was well-tolerated and resulted in modest clinical benefit.
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-1429
First-in-Human Phase I Study of Iadademstat (ORY-1001): A First-in-Class Lysine-Specific Histone Demethylase 1A Inhibitor, in Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
PURPOSE:Iadademstat is a novel, highly potent, and selective inhibitor of LSD1 (KDM1A), with preclinical in vitro and in vivo antileukemic activity. This study aimed to determine safety and tolerability of iadademstat as monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML). METHODS:This phase I, nonrandomized, open-label, dose-escalation (DE), and extension-cohort (EC) trial included patients with R/R AML and evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary antileukemic activity of this orally bioavailable first-in-class lysine-specific demethylase 1 inhibitor. RESULTS:Twenty-seven patients were treated with iadademstat on days 1 to 5 (5-220 µg/m/d) of each week in 28-day cycles in a DE phase that resulted in a recommended dose of 140 µg/m/d of iadademstat as a single agent. This dose was chosen to treat all patients (n = 14) in an EC enriched with patients with MLL/KMT2A-rearranged AML. Most adverse events (AEs) were as expected in R/R AML and included myelosuppression and nonhematologic AEs, such as infections, asthenia, mucositis, and diarrhea. PK data demonstrated a dose-dependent increase in plasma exposure, and PD data confirmed a potent time- and exposure-dependent induction of differentiation biomarkers. Reductions in blood and bone marrow blast percentages were observed, together with induction of blast cell differentiation, in particular, in patients with MLL translocations. One complete remission with incomplete count recovery was observed in the DE arm. CONCLUSION:Iadademstat exhibits a good safety profile together with signs of clinical and biologic activity as a single agent in patients with R/R AML. A phase II trial of iadademstat in combination with azacitidine is ongoing (EudraCT No.: 2018-000482-36).
10.1200/JCO.19.03250