Efficacy of Biofeedback Therapy in Clinical Practice for the Management of Chronic Constipation and Fecal Incontinence.
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
BACKGROUND:Chronic constipation (CC) and fecal incontinence (FI) are often secondary to pelvic floor neuromuscular sensory or motor dysfunction. Biofeedback therapy (BFT) uses visual and verbal feedback to improve anorectal coordination, strength and sensation. In clinical trials, BFT demonstrated response rates between 70% and 80%. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of BFT in clinical practice. METHODS:In this retrospective observational cohort study, the charts of all patients who completed BFT at our centre were reviewed. A positive response to BFT was defined as improvement in ARM profile from baseline or subjective symptom improvement or both. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. RESULTS:One hundred thirty patients with an average age of 57.5 ± 16.4 years and 79.2% female were included. Of all patients, 43.1% were referred for CC, 37.7% for FI, 16.9% for alternating CC and FI, and 2.3% for rectal pain. The overall response rate to BFT was 76.2% (n=99). Of those that responded, 64.6% (n=64) demonstrated both ARM and symptom improvement, 27.3% (n=27) had ARM improvement but no symptom improvement, and 8.1% (n=8) had symptom improvement but no ARM improvement. In patients with FI, the overall response rate was 79.6% (n=39) with symptom improvement in 67.3% (n=33). In those with CC with dyssynergic defecation (n=53), the overall response rate was 69.8% (n=37); however, only 45.3% (n=24) had symptomatic improvement. CONCLUSION:In our clinical practice, although overall response rates to BFT are similar to published reports, patients with CC with dyssynergic defecation are less likely to have symptomatic response compared with those with FI.
10.1093/jcag/gwy036
Kegel Exercises, Biofeedback, Electrostimulation, and Peripheral Neuromodulation Improve Clinical Symptoms of Fecal Incontinence and Affect Specific Physiological Targets: An Randomized Controlled Trial.
Mundet Lluís,Rofes Laia,Ortega Omar,Cabib Christopher,Clavé Pere
Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility
Background/Aims:Fecal incontinence (FI) is a prevalent condition among community-dwelling women, and has a major impact on quality of life (QoL). Research on treatments commonly used in clinical practice-Kegel exercises, biofeedback, electrostimulation, and transcutaneous neuromodulation-give discordant results and some lack methodological rigor, making scientific evidence weak. The aim is to assess the clinical efficacy of these 4 treatments on community-dwelling women with FI and their impact on severity, QoL and anorectal physiology. Methods:A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 150 females with FI assessed with anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasonography, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, anal/rectal sensory-evoked-potentials, clinical severity, and QoL were determined. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the following groups: Kegel (control), biofeedback + Kegel, electrostimulation + Kegel, and neuromodulation + Kegel, treated for 3 months and re-evaluated, then followed up after 6 months. Results:Mean age was 61.09 ± 12.17. Severity of FI and QoL was significantly improved in a similar way after all treatments. The effect on physiology was treatment-specific: Kegel and electrostimulation + Kegel, increased resting pressure ( < 0.05). Squeeze pressures strongly augmented with biofeedback + Kegel, electrostimulation + Kegel and neuromodulation + Kegel ( < 0.01). Endurance of squeeze increased in biofeedback + Kegel and electrostimulation + Kegel ( < 0.01). Rectal perception threshold was reduced in the biofeedback + Kegel, electrostimulation + Kegel, and neuromodulation + Kegel ( < 0.05); anal sensory-evoked-potentials latency shortened in patients with electrostimulation + Kegel ( < 0.05). Conclusions:The treatments for FI assessed have a strong and similar efficacy on severity and QoL but affect specific pathophysiological mechanisms. This therapeutic specificity can help to develop more efficient multimodal algorithm treatments for FI based on pathophysiological phenotypes.
10.5056/jnm20013
Lack of improvement in anorectal manometry parameters after implementation of a pelvic floor/anal sphincter biofeedback in persons with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury.
Neurogastroenterology and motility
BACKGROUND:Effect of biofeedback on improving anorectal manometric parameters in incomplete spinal cord injury is unknown. A short-term biofeedback program investigated any effect on anorectal manometric parameters without correlation to bowel symptoms. METHODS:This prospective uncontrolled interventional study comprised three study subject groups, Group 1: sensory/motor-complete American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A SCI (n = 13); Group 2 (biofeedback group): sensory incomplete AIS B SCI (n = 17) (n = 3), and motor-incomplete AIS C SCI (n = 8), and AIS D SCI (n = 6); and Group 3: able-bodied (AB) controls (n = 12). High-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM) was applied to establish baseline characteristics in all subjects for anorectal pressure, volume, length of pressure zones, and duration of sphincter squeeze pressure. SCI participants with motor-incomplete SCI were enrolled in pelvic floor/anal sphincter bowel biofeedback training (2 × 6-week training periods comprised of two training sessions per week for 30-45 min per session). HR-ARM was also performed after each of the 6-week periods of biofeedback training. RESULTS:Compared to motor-complete or motor-incomplete SCI participants, AB subjects had higher mean intra-rectal pressure, maximal sphincteric pressure, residual anal pressure, recto-anal pressure gradient, and duration of squeeze (p < 0.05 for each of the endpoints). No significant difference was evident at baseline between the motor-complete and motor-incomplete SCI groups. In motor-incomplete SCI subjects, the pelvic floor/anal sphincter biofeedback protocol failed to improve HR-ARM parameters. CONCLUSION:Biofeedback training program did not improve anal manometric parameters in subjects with motor-incomplete or sensory-incomplete SCI. Biofeedback did not change physiology, and its effects on symptoms are unknown. INFERENCES:Utility of biofeedback is limited in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury in terms of improving HR-ARM parameters.
10.1111/nmo.14667
Behavioral management of fecal incontinence in adults.
Norton Christine
Gastroenterology
Biofeedback has been advocated as first-line therapy for patients whose symptoms of mild to moderate fecal incontinence have not responded to simple dietary advice or medication. Three main modalities have been described: (1) use of an intra-anal electromyographic sensor, a probe to measure intra-anal pressure, or perianal surface electromyographic electrodes to teach the patient how to exercise the anal sphincter; (2) use of a 3-balloon system to train the patient to correctly identify the stimulus of rectal distention and to respond without delay; and (3) use of a rectal balloon to retrain the rectal sensory threshold, usually with the aim of enabling the patient to discriminate and respond to smaller rectal volumes. Although a systematic review found that biofeedback eliminated symptoms in up to one half of patients and decreased symptoms in up to two thirds, these studies suffered from methodological problems, a lack of controls, and a lack of validated outcome measures. No studies have compared different exercise instructions, measured patient compliance with those instructions, or determined any trends in symptom response to the exercises prescribed. A recent study by the author suggests that patient-therapist interaction and patient coping strategies may be more important in improving continence than performing exercises or receiving physiological feedback on sphincter function. Better-designed randomized, controlled trials are needed to evaluate different exercise programs and different elements of biofeedback. Development and validation of outcome measures are important, and predictors of outcome and effects in patient subgroups, especially elderly and neurologically impaired patients, should also be investigated.
10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.058
Anorectal functional testing: review of collective experience.
Azpiroz Fernando,Enck Paul,Whitehead William E
The American journal of gastroenterology
Anorectal manometry includes a number of specific tests that are helpful in the diagnostic assessment of patients with fecal incontinence and constipation; their purpose is to delineate the pathophysiological mechanism for these symptoms. Some of these tests may also provide helpful information in the assessment of patients with rectal pain or diarrhea, but their sensitivity and specificity are less well established for these symptoms. Tests for which there is consensus regarding their clinical utility include 1) resting anal canal pressure, 2) anal canal squeeze pressure (peak pressure and duration), 3) the rectoanal inhibitory reflex elicited by balloon distension of the rectum, 4) anal canal pressure in response to a cough, 5) anal canal pressure in response to defecatory maneuvers, 6) simulated defecation by means of balloon or radiopaque contrast, 7) compliance of the rectum in response to balloon distension, and 8) sensory thresholds in response to balloon distension. Anal endosonography and pelvic floor electromyography from intra-anal plate electrodes are nonmanometric tests that are also specifically useful in the evaluation of constipation and fecal incontinence. The clinical utility of all anorectal manometric tests is limited by the relative absence of 1) standardization of test protocols and 2) normative data from a large number of healthy individuals. The interpretation of these diagnostic tests is also complicated by the fact that patients are able to compensate for deficits in specific physiological mechanisms maintaining continence and defecation by utilizing other biological and behavioral mechanisms.
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05450.x
Rectal volume tolerability and anal pressures in patients with fecal incontinence treated with sacral nerve stimulation.
Michelsen Hanne B,Buntzen Steen,Krogh Klaus,Laurberg Søren
Diseases of the colon and rectum
PURPOSE:Sacral nerve stimulation has proven to be a promising treatment for fecal incontinence when conventional treatment modalities have failed. There have been several hypotheses concerning the mode of action of sacral nerve stimulation, but the mechanism is still unclear. This study was designed to evaluate the results of rectal volume tolerability, rectal pressure-volume curves, and anal pressures before and six months after permanent sacral nerve stimulation and to investigate the mode of action of sacral nerve stimulation. METHODS:Twenty-nine patients with incontinence (male/female ratio = 6/23; median age, 58 (range, 29-79) years) underwent implantation of a permanent sacral electrode and neurostimulator after a positive percutaneous nerve evaluation test. Wexner incontinence score, rectal distention with thresholds for "first sensation," "desire to defecate," and "maximal tolerable volume," rectal pressure-volume curves, anal resting pressure, and maximum squeeze pressure were evaluated at baseline and at six months follow-up. RESULTS:Median Wexner incontinence score decreased from 16 (range, 6-20) to 4 (range, 0-12; P < 0. 0001). Median "first sensation" increased from 43 (range, 16-230) ml to 62 (range, 4-186) ml (P = 0.1), median "desire to defecate" from 70 (range, 30-443) ml to 98 (range, 30-327) ml (P = 0.011), and median "maximal tolerable volume" from 130 (range, 68-667) ml to 166 (range, 74-578) ml (P = 0.031). Rectal pressure-volume curves showed a significant increase in rectal capacity (P < 0.0001). The anal resting pressure increased significantly from 31 (range, 0-109) cm H(2)O to 38 (range, 0-111) cm H(2)O (P = 0.045). No significant increase in maximum squeeze pressure was observed. CONCLUSIONS:For patients with fecal incontinence successfully treated with sacral nerve stimulation, there was a significant increase in rectal volume tolerability and rectal capacity. A significant increase in anal resting pressure, but not in maximum squeeze pressure, was found. We suggest that sacral nerve stimulation causes neuromodulation at spinal level.
10.1007/s10350-006-0548-8
Effect of rectal distension on rectal electromechanical activity.
Shafik A,El-Sibai O
Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research
The rectum possesses electric activity in the form of pacesetter potentials (PPs) and action potentials (APs). The latter are associated with rectal pressure elevation and share in the rectal motile activity. A recent study has shown that electric waves are transmitted by the longitudinal but not the circular rectal muscle fibers. Rectal motile activity under normal physiologic conditions was suggested to be induced by the electric waves, that effect longitudinal muscle contraction, as well as by circular muscle stretch resulting from rectal distension. The current study investigated the effect of rectal overdistension on the rectal electromechanical activity aiming at assessing the effect of stool accumulation in the rectum on rectal motile activity. Under general anesthesia, the abdomen of 16 mongrel dogs was opened, the rectum exposed, and 3 electrodes were sutured to the rectal serosa. The rectal pressure was measured by a 10-F catheter connected to a pressure transducer. Rectal distension was achieved by a balloon inflated with carbon dioxide (CO2). Simultaneous recording of the electric activity and rectal pressure was performed during rectal inflation in increments of 10 mL CO2. There was significant increase of rectal pressure as well as of frequency, amplitude, and conduction velocity of PPs and APs on rectal distension. The more the rectal balloon was distended, the more was the increase in rectal pressure and waves variables; the increase was maximal just before balloon expulsion at 40 mL distension. Upon rectal overdistension (50 and 60 mL), no PPs or APs were recorded and the rectal pressure was 0; no balloon expulsion occurred. Rectal overdistension (pathologic distension) appears to abort the electromechanical activity of the rectum and lead to failure of the rectum to expel the balloon. This effect is suggested to be due to overstretch of rectal musculature with a resulting loss of the rectal electric waves and noncontraction of the muscle fibers. These findings appear to explain the cause of rectal atony, which occurs in rectal inertia and leads to constipation.
10.1080/089419301753170066
Rectal pacing in patients with constipation due to rectal inertia: technique and results.
Shafik A,El-Sibai O,Shafik A A
International journal of colorectal disease
In a previous study we determined the rectal pacing parameters needed for rectal evacuation in patients with rectal inertia. Here we investigated the effect of rectal pacing on rectal myoelectric activity, motility, and evacuation in ten patients with constipation due to rectal inertia. A pacemaker was implanted in a subcutaneous pocket above the inguinal area, with a lead threaded in the anal submucosa to be hooked at the rectosigmoid junction. The effect of rectal pacing on rectal electric activity was investigated by inserting two recording electrodes to the rectal mucosa. The patients were then trained for home pacing. No waves were recorded from the rectum at rest. On rectal pacing, slow waves or pacesetter potentials (mean frequency 2.3+/-1.1 cpm, amplitude 0.86+/-0.1 mV, velocity 3.4+/-1.6 ms) were registered after a latency period of 5.2+/-1.6 min. Rectal evacuation, on pacing, occurred in seven of the ten patients. The three who showed no significant response exhibited low wave parameters. Three of seven patients were able to evacuate spontaneously without pacing after having performed daily pacing for 5-6 months. The pacemaker was removed in six patients (three failures and three after spontaneous defecation). Thus rectal pacing succeeded in inducing rectal evacuation in 70% of the patients. The procedure failed in three patients. Three had spontaneous defecation after a few months of rectal pacing. No complications were encountered, and the method was tolerated and acceptable. Further studies on a large group of patients are required.
10.1007/s003840050241
Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.
Jorge J M,Wexner S D
Diseases of the colon and rectum
Fecal incontinence is a challenging condition of diverse etiology and devastating psychosocial impact. Multiple mechanisms may be involved in its pathophysiology, such as altered stool consistency and delivery of contents to the rectum, abnormal rectal capacity or compliance, decreased anorectal sensation, and pelvic floor or anal sphincter dysfunction. A detailed clinical history and physical examination are essential. Anorectal manometry, pudendal nerve latency studies, and electromyography are part of the standard primary evaluation. The evaluation of idiopathic fecal incontinence may require tests such as cinedefecography, spinal latencies, and anal mucosal electrosensitivity. These tests permit both objective assessment and focused therapy. Appropriate treatment options include biofeedback and sphincteroplasty. Biofeedback has resulted in 90 percent reduction in episodes of incontinence in over 60 percent of patients. Overlapping anterior sphincteroplasty has been associated with good to excellent results in 70 to 90 percent of patients. The common denominator between the medical and surgical treatment groups is the necessity of pretreatment physiologic assessment. It is the results of these tests that permit optimal therapeutic assignment. For example, pudendal nerve terminal motor latencies (PNTML) are the most important predictor factor of functional outcome. However, even the most experienced examiner's digit cannot assess PNTML. In the absence of pudendal neuropathy, sphincteroplasty is an excellent option. If neuropathy exists, however, then postanal or total pelvic floor repair remain viable surgical options for the treatment of idiopathic fecal incontinence. In the absence of an adequate sphincter muscle, encirclement procedures using synthetic materials or muscle transfer techniques might be considered. Implantation of a stimulating electrode into the gracilis neosphincter and artificial sphincter implantation are other valid alternatives. The final therapeutic option is fecal diversion. This article reviews the current status of the etiology and incidence of incontinence as well as the evaluation and treatment of this disabling condition.
10.1007/bf02050307
Current Position of Sacral Neuromodulation in Treatment of Fecal Incontinence.
Clinics in colon and rectal surgery
Fecal incontinence (FI) is defined as uncontrolled passage of feces or gas for at least 1-month duration in an individual who previously had control. FI is a common and debilitating condition affecting many individuals. Continence depends on complex relationships between anal sphincters, rectal curvatures, rectoanal sensation, rectal compliance, stool consistency, and neurologic function. Factors, such as pregnancy, chronic diarrhea, diabetes mellitus, previous anorectal surgery, urinary incontinence, smoking, obesity, limited physical activity, white race, and neurologic disease, are known to be the risk factors for FI. Conservative/medical management including biofeedback are recognized as the first-line treatment of the FI. Those who are suitable for surgical intervention and who have failed conservative management, sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has emerged as the treatment of choice in many patients. The surgical technique involves placement of a tined lead with four electrodes through the S3 sacral foramen. The lead is attached to a battery, which acts as a pulse generator, and is placed under the patient's skin in the lower lumbar region. The use of SNS in the treatment of FI has increased over the years and the beneficial effects of this treatment have been substantiated by multiple studies. This review describes SNS as a modality of treatment for FI and its position in the current medical diaspora in patients with FI.
10.1055/s-0040-1714247
Minimally invasive electrical rectal stimulation promotes bowel emptying in an individual with spinal cord injury.
The journal of spinal cord medicine
CONTEXT:Individuals with SCI typically live with neurogenic bowel dysfunction and impaired colonic motility that may significantly impact health and quality of life. Bowel management often includes digital rectal stimulation (DRS) to modulate the recto-colic reflex to promote bowel emptying. This procedure can be time-consuming, caregiver-intensive, and lead to rectal trauma. This study presents a description of using electrical rectal stimulation as an alternative to DRS to help manage bowel emptying in a person with SCI. METHODS:We conducted an exploratory case study with a 65-year-old male with a T4 AIS B SCI who normally relies on DRS as the main component of his regular bowel management strategy. In randomly selected bowel emptying sessions during a 6-week period, the participant received burst-pattern electrical rectal stimulation (ERS) (50 mA, 20 pulses/s at 100 Hz), via a rectal probe electrode until bowel emptying was achieved. The primary outcome measure was number of cycles of stimulation required to complete the bowel routine. RESULTS:17 sessions were performed using ERS. In 16 sessions, a bowel movement was produced after only 1 cycle of ERS. In 13 sessions, complete bowel emptying was achieved with 2 cycles of ERS. CONCLUSIONS:ERS was associated with effective bowel emptying. This work represents the first time ERS has been used to affect bowel emptying in someone with SCI. This approach could be investigated as a tool to evaluate bowel dysfunction, and it could be further refined as a tool for improving bowel emptying.
10.1080/10790268.2023.2212335
Testing for and the role of anal and rectal sensation.
Rogers J
Bailliere's clinical gastroenterology
The rectum is insensitive to stimuli capable of causing pain and other sensations when applied to a somatic cutaneous surface. It is, however, sensitive to distension by an experimental balloon introduced through the anus, though it is not known whether it is the stretching or reflex contraction of the gut wall, or the distortion of the mesentery and adjacent structures which induces the sensation. No specific sensory receptors are seen on careful histological examination of the rectum in humans. However, myelinated and non-myelinated nerve fibres are seen adjacent to the rectal mucosa, but no intraepithelial fibres arise from these. The sensation of rectal distension travels with the parasympathetic system to S2, S3 and S4. The two main methods for quantifying rectal sensation are rectal balloon distension and mucosal electrosensitivity. The balloon is progressively distended until particular sensations are perceived by the patient. The volumes at which these sensations are perceived are recorded. Three sensory thresholds are usually defined: constant sensation of fullness, urge to defecate, and maximum tolerated volume. The modalities of anal sensation can be precisely defined. Touch, pain and temperature sensation exist in normal subjects. There is profuse innervation of the anal canal with a variety of specialized sensory nerve endings: Meissner's corpuscles which record touch sensation, Krause end-bulbs which respond to thermal stimuli, Golgi-Mazzoni bodies and pacinian corpuscles which respond to changes in tension and pressure, and genital corpuscles which respond to friction. In addition, there are large diameter free nerve endings within the epithelium. The nerve pathway for anal canal sensation is via the inferior haemorrhoidal branches of the pudendal nerve to the sacral roots of S2, S3 and S4. Anal sensation may be quantitatively measured in response to electrical stimulation. The technique involves the use of a specialized constant current generator and bipolar electrode probe inserted in the anal canal. The equipment is generally available and the technique has been shown to be an accurate and repeatable quantitative test of anal sensation.
10.1016/0950-3528(92)90026-b