Effect of body position on ventilation distribution in preterm infants on continuous positive airway pressure.
Hough Judith L,Johnston Leanne,Brauer Sandy G,Woodgate Paul G,Pham Trang M T,Schibler Andreas
Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies
RATIONALE:Although continuous positive airway pressure is used extensively in neonatal intensive care units, and despite the belief that positioning is considered vital to the maintenance of good lung ventilation, no data exist on regional ventilation distribution in infants on continuous positive airway pressure ventilatory support. OBJECTIVES:To investigate the effect of body position on regional ventilation in preterm infants on continuous positive airway pressure ventilatory support using electrical impedance tomography. DESIGN:Randomized crossover study design. SETTING:Neonatal intensive care unit. PATIENTS:Twenty-four preterm infants on continuous positive airway pressure were compared to six spontaneously breathing preterm infants. INTERVENTIONS:Random assignment of the order of the positions supine, prone, and quarter prone. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS:Changes in global and regional lung volume were measured with electrical impedance tomography. Although there were no differences between positions, regional tidal volume was increased in the posterior compared with the anterior lung (p < .01) and in the right compared with the left lung (p < .03) in both the spontaneously breathing infants and in the infants on continuous positive airway pressure. The posterior lung filled earlier than the anterior lung in the spontaneously breathing infants (p < .02), whereas in the infants on continuous positive airway pressure the right lung filled before the left lung (p < .01). There was more ventilation inhomogeneity in the infants on continuous positive airway pressure than in the healthy infants (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS:This study presents the first results on regional ventilation distribution in preterm infants on continuous positive airway pressure using electrical impedance tomography. Gravity had little impact on regional ventilation distribution in preterm infants on continuous positive airway pressure or in spontaneously breathing infants in the supine or prone position, indicating that ventilation distribution in preterm infants is not gravity-dependent but follows an anatomical pattern. AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY:: ACTRN12606000210572.
10.1097/PCC.0b013e31822f18d9
A comparison of supine and prone positioning on improves arterial oxygenation in premature neonates.
Eghbalian F
Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine
BACKGROUND:Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is one of the most important causes of mortality and morbidity in premature newborns. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of body position on oxygen saturation in hospitalized premature infants with RDS. METHODS:From June 2010 to December 2012, 69 premature infants with RDS were evaluated in an interventional analytic study. Patients had a mean gestational age (±SD) of 31.4 (±2.41) weeks (range: 28-35 weeks) with a mean birth weight (±SD) of 1446.6 (±218.90) grams (range: 850-2400 grams). Infants were studied both in supine and in prone positions. Oxygen saturation was monitored by trans-cutaneous pulse oximeter and oxygen saturation was continually monitored for 3 hours in each position and mean oxygen saturation was calculated at the end of each 3 hour period. All patients were premature, NPO, oxygen dependent and had RDS. The range of the postnatal age of the studied infants was 24-48 hr. RESULTS:Means (±SD) of oxygen saturation during 3 hours in prone and supine positions were 92.54% (±2.24%) and 91.78% (±2.35%), respectively (p = 0.001). Also means (±SD) of oxygen saturation at the end of each 3-hours period prone and supine positions were 91.30% (±2.42%) and 90.30% (±3.15%), respectively (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION:These findings suggest that, in premature infants with RDS, oxygen saturation was significantly higher in the prone compared with the supine posture.
10.3233/NPM-14814049
The effects of supine and prone positions on oxygenation in premature infants undergoing mechanical ventilation.
Abdeyazdan Zahra,Nematollahi Monirosadat,Ghazavi Zohreh,Mohhamadizadeh Majid
Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research
BACKGROUND:Since the use of high concentrations of oxygen in infants may lead to chronic lung problems, using proper methods of care in infants under mechanical ventilation is one of the most important measures in NICU. This study aimed to investigate the effects of prone and supine positions on oxygenation (SPO(2)) in premature infants under mechanical ventilation and comparing infants' oxygenation in the two positions. METHODS:In across over non randomized clinical trial study, 32 preterm infants under mechanical ventilation who had inclusion criteria were enrolled in simple convenient method. Firstly, they were placed in supine position for 120 minutes and further in prone position for 120 minutes .Their SPO(2) were monitored by pulse oximeter continuously and was recorded every minute. Data analysis was done using Software SPSS(15) by ANOVA test and post hoc test. RESULTS:The data showed that during 120 minutes of exposure of infants in each position there were no significant changes in SPO(2). In addition, the SPO(2) levels in the prone position were significantly higher than the SPO(2) levels in the supine position from 15(th) minute to 120(th) minute (to the end). CONCLUSIONS:Neonatal positioning in prone position is a simple, non-invasive, and free of charge method that could lead to improve oxygenation in infants undergoing mechanical ventilation.
Prone position and reduced thoracoabdominal asynchrony in preterm newborns.
Oliveira Trícia G,Rego Maria A S,Pereira Nadja C,Vaz Lorena O,França Danielle C,Vieira Danielle S R,Parreira Verônica F
Jornal de pediatria
OBJECTIVE:To assess the effect of prone and supine positions on breathing pattern variables, thoracoabdominal motion and peripheral oxygen saturation of hemoglobin of premature newborn infants recovering from respiratory distress syndrome, while breathing spontaneously and in rapid eye movement sleep. METHODS:This was a quasi-experimental study. Twelve preterms weighing > 1,000 g at enrollment were studied in both positions, in random order. Respiratory inductive plethysmography was used to analyze breathing pattern (tidal volume, respiratory rate, minute ventilation, mean inspiratory flow) and thoracoabdominal motion (labored breathing index, phase relation in inspiration, phase relation in expiration, phase relation in total breath and phase angle). Pulse oximetry was used to evaluate peripheral oxygen saturation. Student's t test for paired samples or the Wilcoxon test were used for statistical analysis. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS:A total of 9,167 respiratory cycles were analyzed. The prone position was associated with significant reductions in labored breathing index (-0.84+/-0.69; p = 0.001; 95%CI -1.29 to -0.40), phase relation in inspiration (-27.36+/-17.55; p = 0.000; 95%CI -38.51 to -16.20), phase relation in expiration (-32.36+/-16.20; p = 0.000; 95%CI -42.65 to -22.06) and phase relation in total breath (-30.20+/-14.76; p = 0.000; 95%CI -39.59 to -20.82). There were no significant differences between the two positions in any of the other variables analyzed. CONCLUSION:The prone position resulted in a significant reduction in thoracoabdominal asynchrony, without affecting breathing pattern or peripheral oxygen saturation.
10.2223/JPED.1932
Effect of prone and supine positioning on the diaphragmatic work of breathing in convalescent preterm infants.
Dimitriou Gabriel,Tsintoni Asimina,Vervenioti Aggeliki,Papakonstantinou Despina,Dassios Theodore
Pediatric pulmonology
OBJECTIVES:To compare the work of breathing in the prone and supine positions in convalescent prematurely born infants. WORKING HYPOTHESIS:The work of breathing would be lower in the prone compared to the supine position. STUDY DESIGN:Prospective observational cohort study. PATIENT-SUBJECT SELECTION:Consecutive preterm infants breathing unsupported in room air with a gestational age of 28-34 weeks in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit were studied before discharge from neonatal care. METHODOLOGY:The diaphragmatic pressure time product (PTPdi) was used to assess the work of breathing, calculated as the integration of transdiaphragmatic pressure over the inspiratory time. The PTPdi was measured in prone, supine, and supine with 45° head-up tilt (supine-tilt) positions. RESULTS:The mean (SD) PTPdi was lower in the prone (259 [68] cm H O*s/min) compared with the supine position (320 [78] cm H O*s/min, p= .005). The mean (SD) PTPdi was lower in the supine-tilt position (262 [76] cm H O*s/min) compared with the supine position (p = .032). The PTPdi was not different between the prone and supine-tilt positions (p = .600). The difference in PTPdi between prone and supine was not independently associated with gestational age (standardized coefficient = 0.262, adjusted p= .335), birth weight (standardized coefficient = -0.249, adjusted p= .394) or postmenstrual age at study (standardized coefficient = -0.025, adjusted p= .902). CONCLUSIONS:In convalescent preterm neonates, the work of breathing may be lower in the prone and supine-tilt positions, compared with supine.
10.1002/ppul.25594
The effects of sleeping position on ventilatory responses to carbon dioxide in premature infants.
Smith Adam P R,Saiki Tolulope,Hannam Simon,Rafferty Gerrard F,Greenough Anne
Thorax
BACKGROUND:The prone sleeping position, particularly in prematurely born infants, is associated with an increased risk of sudden infant death syndrome. A possible mechanism is an impaired ability to respond to respiratory compromise. The hypothesis that the ventilatory response to a carbon dioxide (CO(2)) challenge in convalescent, prematurely born infants would be lower in the prone compared with the supine position was therefore tested. METHODS:In each position, ventilatory responses to increasing levels of inspired CO(2) were assessed. The airway pressure change after the first 100 ms of an occluded inspiration (P(0.1)) and the maximum inspiratory pressure with an occluded airway during crying (P(imax)) were measured; the ratio of the P(0.1) to the P(imax) at each inspired CO(2) level and the slope of the P(0.1)/P(imax) response were calculated. Chest and abdominal wall asynchrony was assessed using inductance plethysmography and functional residual capacity (FRC) measured using a helium gas dilution technique. RESULTS:Eighteen infants with a median postmenstrual age of 35 (range 35-37) weeks were studied. In the prone versus the supine position, the mean P(0.1) (p=0.002), the mean P(imax) (p=0.006), the increase in P(0.1) with increasing CO(2) (p=0.007) and the P(0.1)/P(imax) response slope (p=0.007) were smaller. Thoracoabdominal asynchrony was not significantly influenced by position or inspired CO(2). FRC was higher in the prone position (p=0.019). CONCLUSIONS:Convalescent, prematurely born infants have a reduced ventilatory response to CO(2) challenge in the prone position, suggesting they may have an impaired ability to respond to respiratory compromise in that position.
10.1136/thx.2009.127837
Head turning and face-down positioning in prone-sleeping premature infants.
Constantin E,Waters K A,Morielli A,Brouillette R T
The Journal of pediatrics
BACKGROUND:Term infants may die of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) when they assume the face-straight-down or the face-near-straight-down head positions. Preterm infants have a higher SIDS rate, but it is not known how often they assume the face-straight-down and face-near-straight-down positions. OBJECTIVES:To determine the frequency and cardiorespiratory consequences of head turning and face-down head positioning in prone-sleeping premature infants. STUDY DESIGN:Supervised overnight cardiorespiratory and audiovisual recordings were conducted in 15 prone-sleeping preterm infants nearing hospital discharge: birth weight, 1178 101 (SEM) g, postconceptional age, 40 1.0 weeks. RESULTS:The preterm infants, studied at a younger postconceptional age than previously reported term infants, seldom turned their heads during sleep; therefore they rarely assumed the face-straight-down position (6 episodes in 3 infants) or the face-near-straight-down position (30 episodes in 6 infants). CONCLUSIONS:Prematurely born infants, known to be at increased risk of SIDS, rarely assume face-down positions when sleeping prone at approximately 40 weeks' postconceptional age. These results suggest that head turning during sleep is developmentally regulated and may have relevance to understanding the age distribution of SIDS.
10.1016/s0022-3476(99)70240-4
Position dependent changes of cerebral blood flow velocities in premature infants.
Eichler F,Ipsiroglu O,Arif T,Popow C,Heinzl H,Urschitz M,Pollak A
European journal of pediatrics
UNLABELLED:The supine or prone positioning of infants has been a cause of much controversy. Recently it has been postulated that the position dependent hypoperfusion of the brainstem represents a possible cause of sudden infant death. To demonstrate position dependency and maturational changes of cerebral perfusion in premature newborn infants we investigated cerebral blood flow velocities (CBFV) in the main supratentorial and brainstem cerebral arteries. Measurements of CBFV were done with transfontanellar colour-coded Doppler sonography in the internal carotid artery (ICA), basilar artery (BA), and vertebral artery (VA) in the prone (head centered-baseline) and supine positions (maximal rotation to both sides) in 23 premature infants aged between 3-5 days of life. We performed follow-up measurements in 17 infants 7-10 days later and in 16 infants at the corrected age of 1 month. There was no difference in mean CBFVs between the prone and supine position at the first investigation. At the third investigation, CBFVs were significantly higher in the supine compared to the prone position. The CBFVs of the ICA were higher than in the BA and VA. This difference was not influenced by the body position but increased with post-natal age more in the VA (159%) than in the BA (129%) and ICA (128%). Position dependency was not seen in the ICA perfusion. In the prone position, five infants showed an incomplete steal effect in the contralateral VA. There was no significant side difference in the CBFVs of the ICA and VA, but in the resistance indices in the VA (left > right). CONCLUSION:in premature newborns, position dependent changes of cerebral blood flow velocity develop with maturation and are most pronounced in the vertebrobasilar system. These changes are possibly due to compression of the vertebral artery by neck movement and suggest an individual risk of brainstem perfusion deficits that may be aggravated with age and head rotation in a prone position.
Oxygenation Instability Assessed by Oxygen Saturation Histograms during Supine vs Prone Position in Very Low Birthweight Infants Receiving Noninvasive Respiratory Support.
Miller-Barmak Adi,Riskin Arieh,Hochwald Ori,Haddad Julie,Dinur Gil,Vortman Rita,Kugelman Amir,Borenstein-Levin Liron
The Journal of pediatrics
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the effect of prone vs supine position on the oxygenation instability among very low birth weight (VLBW) infants receiving noninvasive respiratory support, as assessed by the average oxygen saturation (SpO) histograms. STUDY DESIGN:Sixty-nine histograms from 23 VLBW infants were studied prospectively. Each infant was studied during 3 consecutive 3-hour periods of alternating positions; 12 infants started the study while prone and 11 infants started supine, by random order. Histogram classification system was used to quantify oxygenation stability and time spent in different SpO ranges. RESULTS:The fraction of inspired oxygen values were similar in both positions. Unstable histograms were more common in supine vs prone position (20/34 [59%] vs 10/35 [29%]; P = .02, respectively). Analyzing oxygenation stability as per position change revealed that a change from prone to supine increased oxygenation instability, and supine to prone decreased instability (P = .02). In the supine vs prone position, percent of time spent in SpO ≤80% and <90% was higher (5.0 ± 4.2 vs 2.4 ± 3.4 [P < .001] and 24.1 ± 13.7 vs 13.2 ± 10.0 [P < .001], respectively), and percent of time in SpO >94% was lower (39.7 ± 26.0 vs 52.4 ± 23.4 [P = .04]). CONCLUSIONS:Prone positioning decreased oxygenation instability and resulted in higher oxygenation among VLBW premature infants on noninvasive respiratory support. SpO histograms allow easy bedside assessment of oxygenation instability, and quantification of the time spent at different SpO ranges.
10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.06.066
Effects of Prone Sleeping on Cerebral Oxygenation in Preterm Infants.
Shepherd Kelsee L,Yiallourou Stephanie R,Odoi Alexsandria,Brew Nadine,Yeomans Emma,Willis Stacey,Horne Rosemary S C,Wong Flora Y
The Journal of pediatrics
OBJECTIVE:To determine the effect of prone sleeping on cerebral oxygenation in preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. STUDY DESIGN:Preterm infants, divided into extremely preterm (gestational age 24-28 weeks; n = 23) and very preterm (gestational age 29-34 weeks; n = 33) groups, were studied weekly until discharge in prone and supine positions during active and quiet sleep. Cerebral tissue oxygenation index (TOI) and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO) were recorded. Cerebral fractional tissue extraction (CFOE) was calculated as CFOE = (SaO - TOI)/SaO. RESULTS:In extremely preterm infants, CFOE increased modestly in the prone position in both sleep states at age 1 week, in no change in TOI despite higher SaO. In contrast, the very preterm infants did not have position-related differences in CFOE until the fifth week of life. In the very preterm infants, TOI decreased and CFOE increased with active sleep compared with quiet sleep and with increasing postnatal age. CONCLUSION:At 1 week of age, prone sleeping increased CFOE in extremely preterm infants, suggesting reduced cerebral blood flow. Our findings reveal important physiological insights in clinically stable preterm infants. Further studies are needed to verify our findings in unstable preterm infants regarding the potential risk of cerebral injury in the prone sleeping position in early postnatal life.
10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.08.076
Effect of lying position on gastric residual volume in premature infants: A systematic review.
Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Premature infants' gastric residual volume may be affected by position. This systematic review was conducted to examine the effect of lying position on the gastric residual volume of preterm newborns fed by gastric tube. Electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, MEDLINE Complete, Academic Search Ultimate, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane, and Scopus) were searched for randomized controlled experimental or quasiexperimental studies in English published between 2011 and 2022 investigating the effect of one or more lying positions on gastric residual volume in premature newborns. The PICOS strategy was used in preparing and reporting the systematic review. A total of 304 articles were retrieved, and the full texts of 12 articles were evaluated for suitability. After eliminating the excluded articles, 10 articles were included in the analysis. The quality of evidence varied, with four studies judged to have poor quality whereas the remaining six were considered to range from moderate to good in quality. Based on the results obtained from the studies, it was determined that gastric residual volume was the least in the right lateral and prone positions and more in the left lateral and supine positions compared with the other two positions, with no difference between the two latter positions. The methodological differences, such as the evaluation of different positions, the timing of positioning and the duration of maintaining in the same position, and the measurement times of gastric residual volume made it difficult to reach a definitive proof. We concluded that high-evidence studies evaluating all positions are needed.
10.1002/ncp.11070
The effects of position on gastric residual volume of premature infants in NICU.
Khatony Alireza,Abdi Alireza,Karimi Batol,Aghaei Abbas,Brojeni Hamidreza Saeidi
Italian journal of pediatrics
BACKGROUND:Nutrition cares are of the main measures to save premature infants. In this regard, proper positioning is one of the key measures that is done by nurses; still there is a paucity of studies in this field and the results of these few studies are an area of ongoing debates. In light of this, the present paper is an attempt to determine the effects of different positioning on gastric residual volume in premature infants in NICU. METHODS:A clinical trial cross-over study was carried out on premature infants in NICU. The subjects, who had inclusion criteria, were selected through convenience sampling based on inclusion criteria and randomly allocated into three groups. Gastric residual volume before and one hours after feeding was measured and recorded for three positions including right-lateral, left-lateral, and prone. The data was analyzed via SPSS-21 using descriptive statistics such as mean, standard deviation, and frequency; and inferential statistics such as Chi Squared, Kruskal Wallis test, and Friedman test. RESULTS:Totally, 135 infants in three groups were studied and the results showed that minimum and maximum gastric residual volumes were in prone (6.49 ± 8.25 ML) and supine (12.59 ± 11.9 ML) positions, respectively. However, Kruskal Wallis test did not show a significant relationship between the three positions under study and the mean gastric residual volume. CONCLUSION:Prone position was featured with the lowest gastric residual volume and highest possibility of absorbing nutrient. Still, given the fact that no significant difference was found in the three groups, further and deeper studies are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION:The project is approved by Iranian Registry of Clinical Trial with no. IRCT. 201404134736 N6 .
10.1186/s13052-018-0591-9
Prone sleeping affects cardiovascular control in preterm infants in NICU.
Shepherd Kelsee L,Wong Flora Y,Odoi Alexsandria,Yeomans Emma,Horne Rosemary S C,Yiallourou Stephanie R
Pediatric research
BACKGROUND:Prone sleeping is used in preterm infants undergoing intensive care to improve respiratory function, but evidence suggests that this position may compromise autonomic cardiovascular control. To test this hypothesis, this study assessed the effects of the prone sleeping position on cardiovascular control in preterm infants undergoing intensive care treatment during early postnatal life. METHODS:Fifty-six preterm infants, divided into extremely preterm (gestational age (GA) 24-28 weeks, n = 23) and very preterm (GA 29-34 weeks, n = 33) groups, were studied weekly for 3 weeks in prone and supine positions, during quiet and active sleep. Heart rate (HR) and non-invasive blood pressure (BP) were recorded and autonomic measures of HR variability (HRV), BP variability (BPV), and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) using frequency analysis in low (LF) and high (HF) bands were assessed. RESULTS:During the first 3 weeks, prone sleeping increased HR, reduced BRS, and increased HF BPV compared to supine. LF and HF HRV were also lower prone compared to supine in very preterm infants. Extremely preterm infants had the lowest HRV and BRS measures, and the highest HF BPV. CONCLUSIONS:Prone sleeping dampens cardiovascular control in early postnatal life in preterm infants, having potential implications for BP regulation in infants undergoing intensive care.
10.1038/s41390-020-01254-z
Effect of time and body position on ventilation in premature infants.
Hough Judith,Trojman Anthony,Schibler Andreas
Pediatric research
BACKGROUND:Infants with respiratory dysfunction undergo regular position changes to improve lung function however it is not known how often a position change should occur. This study measured changes in lung function occurring over time after repositioning in preterm infants. METHODS:Changes in end-expiratory level (EEL) and ventilation distribution were measured 30 mins, 2 h, and 4 h after repositioning into either prone, quarter turn from prone, or supine using Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT). Physiological measurements were also taken. RESULTS:Sixty preterm infants were included in the study. Infants receiving respiratory support (mechanical ventilation or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)) had improved ventilation homogeneity after 2 h (P < 0.01), maintained at 4 h. Spontaneously breathing infants had improved homogeneity at 2 h (P < 0.01) and improved global EEL after 4 h (P < 0.01) whereas infants receiving CPAP demonstrated an improved global EEL at 2 h (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION:Regional ventilation distribution is influenced by time independent of changes due to body position. Differences exist between infants on ventilatory support compared with those who are spontaneously breathing. Infants receiving ventilatory support have a physiological peak in lung function after 2 h which remains above baseline at 4 h. A change in body position facilitates an improvement in lung function in infants on ventilatory support.
10.1038/pr.2016.116
The Quarter Prone Position Increases Oxygen Saturation in Premature Infants Using Continuous Positive Airway Pressure.
Utario Yossy,Rustina Yeni,Waluyanti Fajar Tri
Comprehensive child and adolescent nursing
A primary problem that occurs in premature infants is oxygenation disorders, thus requiring respiratory support, including continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). The effectiveness of CPAP can be improved by adjusting the body's position, so the aim of this study was to examine the effect of the quarter prone position on the oxygenation status of preterm infants using CPAP. This study used a randomized controlled trial with a crossover design. A group of 15 preterm infants receiving CPAP was selected, and randomization of allocation was done to divide the respondents into the intervention group (quarter prone) or the control group (supine). Oxygenation status was measured using an observation form, and the result showed a significant difference in the oxygen saturation levels of premature infants using CPAP in the quarter prone group compared to that in the supine group (p = .045). The quarter prone position was effective for improving the oxygenation status of premature infants using CPAP. It is recommended that the quarter prone position be applied as part of nursing care in neonatal nursing.
10.1080/24694193.2017.1386976
A systematic review of improved positions and supporting devices for premature infants in the NICU.
Heliyon
Background:In the neonatal intensive care unit, nurses often place premature infants in the supine, prone, and lateral positions. However, these positions do not always meet all the physiological needs of premature infants. Thus, many improved positions and various position-supporting devices have been studied to provide infants with a development-friendly and comfortable environment. Aim:We aimed to help nurses recognize and understand the various improved positions and devices, and to provide nurses with more options in addressing the needs of preterm infants. Study design:We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE from 2012 to 2022 for studies on position management of preterm infants, and screened the search results according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then we extracted data and evaluated the quality of the included studies. Finally, we conducted a qualitative summary of the results. Results:Twenty-one articles were included in this review. Fourteen were studies about improved positions, including hammock position, facilitated tucking position, ROP position, reverse kangaroo mother care position (R-KMC), and supported diagonal flexion position (SDF). Seven were studies on positioning devices, four on cranial deformity prevention, and three on reformative swaddling. They have a positive impact on sleep and flexion maintenance, in addition, they can prevent head deformity and reduce the pain of premature infants. Conclusion:The position management of premature infants is diversified. Instead of sticking to a single position placement, nurses should adjust the position according to the unique physiological conditions of infants to reduce sequelae and promote their recovery and growth during long-term hospitalization. There should be more studies on position management with large sample sizes in the future.
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14388
Strategies for the withdrawal of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm infants.
Jardine Luke A,Inglis Garry Dt,Davies Mark W
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
BACKGROUND:While indications for the use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and its associated risks and benefits are extensively investigated, the best strategy for the withdrawal of NCPAP remains unknown. In a survey of Australian and New Zealand Neonatologists, 56% stated that their approach to NCPAP weaning was "ad hoc" (Jardine 2008). At what point an infant is considered stable enough to attempt to start withdrawing their NCPAP is not clearly established. The criteria for a failed attempt at NCPAP withdrawal is also not clear. OBJECTIVES:To determine the risks and benefits of different strategies used for the withdrawal of NCPAP in preterm infants. SEARCH STRATEGY:Searches were made of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group Specialised Register, MEDLINE from 1966 to June 2010, CINAHL from 1982 to June 2010, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 2). Previous reviews (including cross references) were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA:We included all randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials in which either individual newborn infants or clusters of infants (such as separate neonatal units) were randomised to different NCPAP withdrawal strategies (from the first time they come off NCPAP and any subsequent weaning and/or withdrawal attempt). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:We used standard methods of The Cochrane Collaboration and its Neonatal Review Group. MAIN RESULTS:We identified four potentially eligible studies. Three studies are included in this review. One study showed a significant decrease in the duration of oxygen therapy and a significantly decreased length of stay for babies randomised to a weaning strategy where NCPAP is simply stopped when infants met predefined stability criteria. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:Infants who have their NCPAP pressure weaned to a predefined level and then stop NCPAP completely have less total time on NCPAP and shorter durations of oxygen therapy and hospital stay compared with those that have NCPAP removed for a predetermined number of hours each day. Future trials of withdrawing NCPAP should compare proposed strategies with weaning NCPAP pressure to a predefined level and then stopping NCPAP completely. Clear criteria need to be established for the definition of stability prior to attempting to withdraw NCPAP.
10.1002/14651858.CD006979.pub2
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels for the prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
BACKGROUND:Preterm infants are at risk of lung atelectasis due to various anatomical and physiological immaturities, placing them at high risk of respiratory failure and associated harms. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is a positive pressure applied to the airways via the nares. It helps prevent atelectasis and supports adequate gas exchange in spontaneously breathing infants. Nasal CPAP is used in the care of preterm infants around the world. Despite its common use, the appropriate pressure levels to apply during nasal CPAP use remain uncertain. OBJECTIVES:To assess the effects of 'low' (≤ 5 cm HO) versus 'moderate-high' (> 5 cm HO) initial nasal CPAP pressure levels in preterm infants receiving CPAP either: 1) for initial respiratory support after birth and neonatal resuscitation or 2) following mechanical ventilation and endotracheal extubation. SEARCH METHODS:We ran a comprehensive search on 6 November 2020 in the following databases: CENTRAL via CRS Web and MEDLINE via Ovid. We also searched clinical trials databases and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized trials. SELECTION CRITERIA:We included RCTs, quasi-RCTs, cluster-RCTs and cross-over RCTs randomizing preterm infants of gestational age < 37 weeks or birth weight < 2500 grams within the first 28 days of life to different nasal CPAP levels. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:We used the standard methods of Cochrane Neonatal to collect and analyze data. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence for the prespecified primary outcomes. MAIN RESULTS:Eleven trials met inclusion criteria of the review. Four trials were parallel-group RCTs reporting our prespecified primary or secondary outcomes. Two trials randomized 316 infants to low versus moderate-high nasal CPAP for initial respiratory support, and two trials randomized 117 infants to low versus moderate-high nasal CPAP following endotracheal extubation. The remaining seven studies were cross-over trials reporting short-term physiological outcomes. The most common potential sources of bias were absent or unclear blinding of personnel and assessors and uncertain selective reporting. Nasal CPAP for initial respiratory support after birth and neonatal resuscitation None of the six primary outcomes prespecified for inclusion in the summary of findings was eligible for meta-analysis. No trials reported on moderate-severe neurodevelopmental impairment at 18 to 26 months. The remaining five outcomes were reported in a single trial. On the basis of this trial, we are uncertain whether low or moderate-high nasal CPAP levels improve the outcomes of: death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age (PMA) (risk ratio (RR) 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56 to 1.85; 1 trial, 271 participants); mortality by hospital discharge (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.51 to 2.12; 1 trial, 271 participants); BPD at 28 days of age (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.56 to 2.17; 1 trial, 271 participants); BPD at 36 weeks' PMA (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.57; 1 trial, 271 participants), and treatment failure or need for mechanical ventilation (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.57; 1 trial, 271 participants). We assessed the certainty of the evidence as very low for all five outcomes due to risk of bias, a lack of consistency across multiple studies, and imprecise effect estimates. Nasal CPAP following mechanical ventilation and endotracheal extubation One of the six primary outcomes prespecified for inclusion in the summary of findings was eligible for meta-analysis. On the basis of these data, we are uncertain whether low or moderate-high nasal CPAP levels improve the outcome of treatment failure or need for mechanical ventilation (RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.50; 2 trials, 117 participants; I = 17%; risk difference 0.15, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.32; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome 7, 95% CI -50 to 3). We assessed the certainty of the evidence as very low due to risk of bias, inconsistency across the studies, and imprecise effect estimates. No trials reported on moderate-severe neurodevelopmental impairment at 18 to 26 months or BPD at 28 days of age. The remaining three outcomes were reported in a single trial. On the basis of this trial, we are uncertain whether low or moderate-high nasal CPAP levels improve the outcomes of: death or BPD at 36 weeks' PMA (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.49; 1 trial, 93 participants); mortality by hospital discharge (RR 2.94, 95% CI 0.12 to 70.30; 1 trial, 93 participants), and BPD at 36 weeks' PMA (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.49; 1 trial, 93 participants). We assessed the certainty of the evidence as very low for all three outcomes due to risk of bias, a lack of consistency across multiple studies, and imprecise effect estimates. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There are insufficient data from randomized trials to guide nasal CPAP level selection in preterm infants, whether provided as initial respiratory support or following extubation from invasive mechanical ventilation. We are uncertain as to whether low or moderate-high nasal CPAP levels improve morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Well-designed trials evaluating this important aspect of a commonly used neonatal therapy are needed.
10.1002/14651858.CD012778.pub2
Continuous positive airway pressure: Physiology and comparison of devices.
Gupta Samir,Donn Steven M
Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is increasingly used for respiratory support in preterm babies at birth and after extubation from mechanical ventilation. Various CPAP devices are available for use that can be broadly grouped into continuous flow and variable flow. There are potential physiologic differences between these CPAP systems and the choice of a CPAP device is too often guided by individual expertise and experience rather than by evidence. When interpreting the evidence clinicians should take into account the pressure generation sources, nasal interface, and the factors affecting the delivery of pressure, such as mouth position and respiratory drive. With increasing use of these devices, better monitoring techniques are required to assess the efficacy and early recognition of babies who are failing and in need of escalated support.
10.1016/j.siny.2016.02.009
Duration of continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants.
Bamat Nicolas,Jensen Erik A,Kirpalani Haresh
Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been used for respiratory support in premature infants for more than 40 years and is now a cornerstone of modern neonatal care. Clinical research on CPAP has primarily focused on understanding which devices and pressure sources best implement this therapy. In contrast, less research has examined the optimal duration over which CPAP is administered. We review this aspect of CPAP therapy.
10.1016/j.siny.2016.02.005
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for apnoea of prematurity.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
BACKGROUND:Apnoea of prematurity (AoP) is defined as a pause in breathing for 20 seconds or longer, or for less than 20 seconds when accompanied by bradycardia and hypoxaemia, in a preterm infant. An association between the severity of apnoea and neurodevelopmental delay has been reported. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is a form of non-invasive ventilatory assistance that has been shown to be relatively safe and effective in preventing and treating respiratory distress among preterm infants. It is less clear whether CPAP treatment is safe and effective in the prevention and treatment of AoP. OBJECTIVES:1. To assess the effects of CPAP on AoP in preterm infants (this may be compared to supportive care or mechanical ventilation). 2. To assess the effects of different CPAP delivery systems on AoP in preterm infants. SEARCH METHODS:Searches were conducted in September 2022 in the following databases: Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. We also searched clinical trial registries and the reference lists of studies selected for inclusion. SELECTION CRITERIA:We included all randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which researchers determined that CPAP was necessary for AoP in preterm infants (born before 37 weeks). Cross-over studies were also included, provided sufficient data were available for analysis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:We used the standard methods of Cochrane and Cochrane Neonatal, including independent assessment of risk of bias and extraction of data by at least two review authors. Discrepancies were resolved by involvement of a third author. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence for the following outcomes: 1) failed CPAP; 2) apnoea; 3) adverse effects of CPAP. MAIN RESULTS:We included four single-centre trials conducted in Malaysia, Spain, Germany, and North America, involving 138 infants with a mean/median gestation of 26 to 28 weeks. Two studies were parallel-group RCTs and two were cross-over trials. None of the studies compared CPAP with supportive care. All trials compared one form of CPAP with another. Two compared a variable flow device with ventilator CPAP, one compared two different variable flow devices, and one compared a variable flow device with bubble CPAP. Interventions were administered for periods ranging between six and 48 hours, with pressures between 4 and 6 cm HO. We assessed all trials as having a high risk of bias for blinding of participants and personnel, and two studies for blinding of outcome assessors. We found a high risk of a carry-over effect in two studies where the washout period was not adequately described, and a high risk of bias in a study that appeared to use an analysis method not generally accepted for cross-over studies. Comparison 1. CPAP and supportive care compared to supportive care alone We did not identify any study for inclusion in this comparison. Comparison 2. CPAP delivered by different types of devices 2a. Variable flow compared to ventilator CPAP Two studies were included in this comparison. We are very uncertain whether there is any difference in the incidence of failed CPAP, defined as the need for mechanical ventilation (risk ratio (RR) 0.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 2.90; 1 study, 26 participants; very low-certainty). We are very uncertain whether there is any difference in the frequency of apnoea events (mean difference (MD) per four-hour interval -0.10, 95% CI -1.30 to 1.10; 1 study, 26 participants; very low-certainty). We are uncertain whether there is any difference in adverse events. Neurodevelopmental outcomes were not reported. 2b. Variable flow compared to bubble CPAP We included one study in this comparison, but it did not report our pre-specified outcomes. 2c. Infant Flow variable flow CPAP compared to Medijet variable flow CPAP We are very uncertain whether there is any difference in the incidence of failed CPAP (RR 2.62, 95% CI 0.91 to 7.53; 1 study, 80 participants; very low-certainty). The frequency of apnoea was not reported, and we do not know whether there is any difference in adverse events. Neurodevelopmental outcomes were not reported. Comparison 3. CPAP compared to mechanical ventilation We did not identify any studies for inclusion in this comparison. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:Due to the limited available evidence, we are very uncertain whether any CPAP device is more effective than other forms of supportive care, other CPAP devices, or mechanical ventilation for the prevention and treatment of AoP. The devices used in these studies included two types of variable flow CPAP device: bubble CPAP and ventilator CPAP. For each comparison, data were only available from a single study. There are theoretical reasons why these devices might have different effects on AoP, therefore further trials are indicated.
10.1002/14651858.CD013660.pub2
Methylxanthine for the prevention and treatment of apnea in preterm infants.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
BACKGROUND:Very preterm infants often require respiratory support and are therefore exposed to an increased risk of chronic lung disease and later neurodevelopmental disability. Although methylxanthines are widely used to prevent and treat apnea associated with prematurity and to facilitate extubation, there is uncertainty about the benefits and harms of different types of methylxanthines. OBJECTIVES:To assess the effects of methylxanthines on the incidence of apnea, death, neurodevelopmental disability, and other longer-term outcomes in preterm infants (1) at risk for or with apnea, or (2) undergoing extubation. SEARCH METHODS:We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other databases, and three trial registers (November 2022). SELECTION CRITERIA:We included randomized trials in preterm infants, in which methylxanthines (aminophylline, caffeine, or theophylline) were compared to placebo or no treatment for any indication (i.e. prevention of apnea, treatment of apnea, or prevention of re-intubation). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:We used standard Cochrane methods and GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS:We included 18 studies (2705 infants), evaluating the use of methylxanthine in preterm infants for: any indication (one study); prevention of apnea (six studies); treatment of apnea (five studies); and to prevent re-intubation (six studies). Death or major neurodevelopmental disability (DMND) at 18 to 24 months. Only the Caffeine for Apnea of Prematurity (CAP) study (enrolling 2006 infants) reported on this outcome. Overall, caffeine probably reduced the risk of DMND in preterm infants treated with caffeine for any indication (risk ratio (RR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78 to 0.97; risk difference (RD) -0.06, 95% CI -0.10 to -0.02; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 16, 95% CI 10 to 50; 1 study, 1869 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). No other trials reported DMND. Results from the CAP trial regarding DMND at 18 to 24 months are less precise when analyzed based on treatment indication. Caffeine probably results in little or no difference in DMND in infants treated for prevention of apnea (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.24; RD -0.00, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.09; 1 study, 423 infants; moderate-certainty evidence) and probably results in a slight reduction in DMND in infants treated for apnea of prematurity (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.01; RD -0.06, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.00; NNTB 16, 95% CI 7 to > 1000; 1 study, 767 infants; moderate-certainty evidence) or to prevent re-intubation (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.99; RD -0.08, 95% CI -0.15 to -0.00; NNTB 12, 95% CI 6 to >1000; 1 study, 676 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). Death. In the overall analysis of any methylxanthine treatment for any indication, methylxanthine used for any indication probably results in little or no difference in death at hospital discharge (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.37; I = 0%; RD -0.00, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.02; I = 5%; 7 studies, 2289 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). Major neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months. In the CAP trial, caffeine probably reduced the risk of major neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.96; RD -0.06, 95% CI -0.10 to -0.02; NNTB 16, 95% CI 10 to 50; 1 study, 1869 infants; moderate-certainty evidence), including a reduction in the risk of cerebral palsy or gross motor disability (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.88; RD -0.03, 95% CI -0.05 to -0.01; NNTB 33, 95% CI 20 to 100; 1 study, 1810 infants; moderate-certainty evidence) and a marginal reduction in the risk of developmental delay (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.00; RD -0.05, 95% CI -0.09 to -0.00; NNTB 20, 95% CI 11 to > 1000; 1 study, 1725 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). Any apneic episodes, failed apnea reduction after two to seven days (< 50% reduction in apnea) (for infants treated with apnea), and need for positive-pressure ventilation after institution of treatment. Methylxanthine used for any indication probably reduces the occurrence of any apneic episodes (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.52; I = 47%; RD -0.38, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.25; I = 49%; NNTB 3, 95% CI 2 to 4; 4 studies, 167 infants; moderate-certainty evidence), failed apnea reduction after two to seven days (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.70; I = 0%; RD -0.31, 95% CI -0.44 to -0.17; I = 53%; NNTB 3, 95% CI 2 to 6; 4 studies, 174 infants; moderate-certainty evidence), and may reduce receipt of positive-pressure ventilation after institution of treatment (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.96; I = 0%; RD -0.06, 95% CI -0.11 to -0.01; I = 49%; NNTB 16, 95% CI 9 to 100; 9 studies, 373 infants; low-certainty evidence). Chronic lung disease. Methylxanthine used for any indication reduces chronic lung disease (defined as the use of supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age) (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.85; I = 0%; RD -0.10, 95% CI -0.14 to -0.06; I = 18%; NNTB 10, 95% CI 7 to 16; 4 studies, 2142 infants; high-certainty evidence). Failure to extubate or the need for re-intubation within one week after initiation of therapy. Methylxanthine used for the prevention of re-intubation probably results in a large reduction in failed extubation compared with no treatment (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.71; I = 0%; RD -0.27, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.15; I = 69%; NNTB 4, 95% CI 2 to 6; 6 studies, 197 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:Caffeine probably reduces the risk of death, major neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months, and the composite outcome DMND at 18 to 24 months. Administration of any methylxanthine to preterm infants for any indication probably leads to a reduction in the risk of any apneic episodes, failed apnea reduction after two to seven days, cerebral palsy, developmental delay, and may reduce receipt of positive-pressure ventilation after institution of treatment. Methylxanthine used for any indication reduces chronic lung disease (defined as the use of supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age).
10.1002/14651858.CD013830.pub2
Prophylactic versus therapeutic caffeine for apnea of prematurity: a randomized controlled trial.
The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians
BACKGROUND:Therapeutic initiation of methyxanthines for treatment of apnea in preterm infants was the standard policy. Caffeine therapy is beneficial for various outcomes of preterm infants. AIM:To evaluate the efficacy of early prophylactic compared to routine therapeutic caffeine therapy on duration of oxygen support and other outcomes of preterm infants. METHODS:In a randomized controlled trial including preterm infants < 32 weeks' gestation, prophylactic (in the first 72 h of life) versus therapeutic (only if apnea exists or infant requires mechanical ventilation) decision of caffeine was compared. The primary outcome was the duration of oxygen therapy. Secondary outcomes included duration of respiratory support modalities; bronchoplumonary dysplasia (BPD); necrotizing enterocolitis; intra-ventricular hemorrhage; retinopathy of prematurity; length of hospital stay (LOS); neonatal mortality; and caffeine side effects. RESULTS:We enrolled 90 infants in the prophylactic and 91 infants in therapeutic groups respectively. Prophylactic caffeine decreased the duration of oxygen therapy [median and IQR of 28 (18-36) days versus 34 (23-51) days, = .005 respectively]. Prophylactic caffeine significantly decreased the durations of respiratory support modalities, LOS, and incidences of mild to moderate BPD without reported effects on the incidence of severe BPD or other clinical outcomes compared to therapeutic caffeine. A significantly higher proportion of infants in the prophylactic caffeine group did not require mechanical ventilation during their NICU admission and a significant lower proportion required late mechanical ventilation compared to the prophylactic caffeine group. CONCLUSION:Prophylactic caffeine decreased the duration of oxygen therapy, invasive and noninvasive ventilation, incidences of mild to moderate BPD, and LOS in preterm infants.
10.1080/14767058.2021.1904873
Immature control of breathing and apnea of prematurity: the known and unknown.
Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association
This narrative review provides a broad perspective on immature control of breathing, which is universal in infants born premature. The degree of immaturity and severity of clinical symptoms are inversely correlated with gestational age. This immaturity presents as prolonged apneas with associated bradycardia or desaturation, or brief respiratory pauses, periodic breathing, and intermittent hypoxia. These manifestations are encompassed within the clinical diagnosis of apnea of prematurity, but there is no consensus on minimum criteria required for diagnosis. Common treatment strategies include caffeine and noninvasive respiratory support, but other therapies have also been advocated with varying effectiveness. There is considerable variability in when and how to initiate and discontinue treatment. There are significant knowledge gaps regarding effective strategies to quantify the severity of clinical manifestations of immature breathing, which prevent us from better understanding the long-term potential adverse outcomes, including neurodevelopment and sudden unexpected infant death.
10.1038/s41372-021-01010-z
Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Apnea of Prematurity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
American journal of perinatology
OBJECTIVE:The study aimed to systematically review and analyze the impact of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on apnea of prematurity (AOP) in preterm neonates. STUDY DESIGN:In this systematic review and meta-analysis, experimental studies enrolling preterm infants comparing NIPPV (synchronized, nonsynchronized, and bi-level) and CPAP (all types) were searched in multiple databases and screened for the assessment of AOP. Primary outcome was AOP frequency per hour (as defined by authors of included studies). RESULTS:Out of 4,980 articles identified, 18 studies were included with eight studies contributing to the primary outcome. All studies had a high risk of bias, with significant heterogeneity in definition and measurement of AOP. There was no difference in AOPs per hour between NIPPV versus CPAP (weighted mean difference = -0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.76 to 0.37; eight studies, 456 patients). However, in a post hoc analysis evaluating the presence of any AOP (over varying time periods), the pooled odds ratio (OR) was lower with NIPPV (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.32-0.67; 10 studies, 872 patients). CONCLUSION:NIPPV was not associated with decrease in AOP frequency, although demonstrated lower odds of developing any AOP. However, definite recommendations cannot be made based on the quality of the published evidence. KEY POINTS:· AOP is a common clinical complication related to preterm birth.. · NIPPV is often used to mitigate AOP and complications.. · Relative impact of NIPPV and CPAP on AOP remains unclear..
10.1055/s-0040-1722337