Cranial nerve injuries in Le Fort I osteotomy: a systematic review.
International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
The aim of this systematic review was to describe the anatomical and surgical factors related to cranial nerve injuries in Le Fort I osteotomy. The protocol of this systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Two independent reviewers performed an unrestricted electronic database search in the MEDLINE/PubMed, LILACS, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to and including August 2018. Thirty-two articles were selected for data extraction and synthesis: 30 studies were identified in the main search and two by a manual search. The level of agreement between the reviewers was considered excellent (κ=0.779 for study selection and κ=0.767 for study eligibility). This study revealed that the main nerve affected was the trigeminal nerve, followed by the oculomotor, abducens, optic, facial, and vagus and accessory nerves. Cleft lip and palate patients presented the highest incidence of cranial nerve damage. Cranial nerve damage after Le Fort I osteotomy is not rare. Anatomical and structural knowledge of the patient are necessary in order to minimize the risks of cranial nerve injury in Le Fort I osteotomy.
10.1016/j.ijom.2018.11.012
Clonidine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine for Suprazygomatic Maxillary Nerve Blocks in Cleft lip and Palate Repair: A Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blind Study.
Barbero Gaston Echaniz,de Miguel Marcos,Sierra Plinio,Merritt Glenn,Bora Pranjal,Borah Nabamallika,Ciarallo Christopher,Ing Richard,Bosenberg Adrian,de Nadal Miriam
The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association
OBJECTIVES:Does clonidine, as adjuvant to bupivacaine for suprazygomatic maxillary nerve blocks, reduce emergence agitation in patients undergoing cleft lip and cleft palate surgery? DESIGN:Randomized, controlled, and double-blind study. SETTING:Guwahati Comprehensive Cleft Care Center, Guwahati (Assam, India). PARTICIPANTS:A total of 124 patients; with a median age of 5 years in the clonidine group (CLG) and 7 years in the control group (CG), who underwent cleft lip or cleft palate surgery were included. Exclusion criteria included lack of consent from patients or their guardians, allergy to local anesthetics, coagulation disorders, local infection at the puncture site before performing the block, and language difficulties or cognitive disorders. INTERVENTIONS:Patients were randomized into 2 groups to receive bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve blocks with either a bupivacaine/clonidine mixture for the CLG or bupivacaine alone in the CG. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:The primary end point was the incidence of emergence agitation. RESULTS:There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of emergence agitation (30.2% in the CG compared to 15.2% in the CLG; difference of incidences: 15%, 95% CI: 0.1-30.1). The percentage of patients requiring intraoperative Fentanyl was lower in the CLG (10.6% compared to 26.4%; difference of incidences: 15.8%, 95% CI: 1.8-29). No other differences were observed. Further research in a more typically aged children population undergoing cleft surgery is needed. CONCLUSIONS:The use of clonidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in maxillary nerve block reduces the incidence of emergence agitation and intraoperative opioid consumption without hemodynamic or sedative side effects in patients undergoing cleft lip and palate surgery.
10.1177/1055665620964141
Pbx loss in cranial neural crest, unlike in epithelium, results in cleft palate only and a broader midface.
Journal of anatomy
Orofacial clefting represents the most common craniofacial birth defect. Cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) is genetically distinct from cleft palate only (CPO). Numerous transcription factors (TFs) regulate normal development of the midface, comprising the premaxilla, maxilla and palatine bones, through control of basic cellular behaviors. Within the Pbx family of genes encoding Three Amino-acid Loop Extension (TALE) homeodomain-containing TFs, we previously established that in the mouse, Pbx1 plays a preeminent role in midfacial morphogenesis, and Pbx2 and Pbx3 execute collaborative functions in domains of coexpression. We also reported that Pbx1 loss from cephalic epithelial domains, on a Pbx2- or Pbx3-deficient background, results in CL/P via disruption of a regulatory network that controls apoptosis at the seam of frontonasal and maxillary process fusion. Conversely, Pbx1 loss in cranial neural crest cell (CNCC)-derived mesenchyme on a Pbx2-deficient background results in CPO, a phenotype not yet characterized. In this study, we provide in-depth analysis of PBX1 and PBX2 protein localization from early stages of midfacial morphogenesis throughout development of the secondary palate. We further establish CNCC-specific roles of PBX TFs and describe the developmental abnormalities resulting from their loss in the murine embryonic secondary palate. Additionally, we compare and contrast the phenotypes arising from PBX1 loss in CNCC with those caused by its loss in the epithelium and show that CNCC-specific Pbx1 deletion affects only later secondary palate morphogenesis. Moreover, CNCC mutants exhibit perturbed rostro-caudal organization and broadening of the midfacial complex. Proliferation defects are pronounced in CNCC mutants at gestational day (E)12.5, suggesting altered proliferation of mutant palatal progenitor cells, consistent with roles of PBX factors in maintaining progenitor cell state. Although the craniofacial skeletal abnormalities in CNCC mutants do not result from overt patterning defects, osteogenesis is delayed, underscoring a critical role of PBX factors in CNCC morphogenesis and differentiation. Overall, the characterization of tissue-specific Pbx loss-of-function mouse models with orofacial clefting establishes these strains as unique tools to further dissect the complexities of this congenital craniofacial malformation. This study closely links PBX TALE homeodomain proteins to the variation in maxillary shape and size that occurs in pathological settings and during evolution of midfacial morphology.
10.1111/joa.12821
Bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve blocks vs. infraorbital and palatine nerve blocks in cleft lip and palate repair: A double-blind, randomised study.
Echaniz Gaston,De Miguel Marcos,Merritt Glenn,Sierra Plinio,Bora Pranjal,Borah Nabamallika,Ciarallo Christopher,de Nadal Miriam,Ing Richard J,Bosenberg Adrian
European journal of anaesthesiology
BACKGROUND:Cleft defects are common craniofacial malformations which require early surgical repair. These patients are at high risk of postoperative airway obstruction and respiratory failure. Cleft surgery may require high doses of opioids which may contribute to these complications. OBJECTIVES:To compare the effectiveness of proximal and distal approaches to blocking the maxillary nerve in patients undergoing cleft lip or cleft palate surgery. DESIGN:Randomised, controlled and double-blind study. SETTING:The current study was carried out in Guwahati (Assam, India) between April 2014 and June 2014. PATIENTS:A total of 114 patients older than 6 months who underwent cleft lip or cleft palate surgery were included. Exclusion criteria included coagulation disorders, peripheral neuropathy or chronic pain syndrome, infection in the puncture site, allergy to local anaesthetics, lack of consent and language problems or other barriers that could impede the assessment of postoperative pain. INTERVENTIONS:Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: proximal group (bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve blocks) and distal group (bilateral infraorbital nerve blocks for cleft lip repair and bilateral greater and lesser palatine nerve blocks and nasopalatine nerve block for cleft palate surgery). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients requiring extra doses of opioids. Secondary endpoints included pain scores, respiratory and nerve block-related complications during the first 24 h. RESULTS:In the intra-operative period, there was a significant reduction of nalbuphine consumption in the proximal group (9.1 vs. 25.4%, P = 0.02). The percentage of patients requiring intra-operative fentanyl was lower in the proximal group (16.4 vs. 30.5%, P = 0.07). There were no differences in either postoperative pain scores or in postoperative complications. No technical failure or block-related complications were reported. CONCLUSION:Bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block is an effective and safe alternative to the traditional peripheral nerve blocks for cleft lip and cleft palate surgery, in a mixed paediatric and adult population.
10.1097/EJA.0000000000000900