Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is a very common cause of hospital admission and its diagnostic and treatment may be difficult sometimes. While vagal maneuvers or intravenous adenosis administration during 12-lead ECG recording should be performed in hemodynamically stable patients for diagnosis and treatment, hemodynamically unstable patients should be carioverted immediately. The new ESC guideline (2019) on diagnosis and clinical management of SVT significantly upgrades catheter ablation and gives it a new preferential status. For example, in patients with symptomatic recurrence, atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia should be ablated due to the very low risk of AV block. Furthermore, catheter ablation should also be offered as first-line therapy to patients with reentrant and focal arrhythmias. The diagnosis and therapy of tachycardiomyopathy is of particular importance and treatment should incorporate the ablation of the underlying supraventricular tachycardia. The therapy of supraventricular tachycardia during pregnancy should be free of antiarrhythmic medication, especially in the first trimester. If ablation is necessary during pregnancy, only fluoroscopy-free mapping systems should be used. This review covers aspects of ECG diagnosis and guideline-based treatment of SVT.

Patients with inherited arrhythmia syndromes (IASs) and inherited cardiomyopathies (ICs) are periodically encountered in both general and specialist practices. These syndromes include long QT syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, Brugada syndrome, early repolarisation syndrome, and hypertrophic and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies. In general, the presence of an IAS or IC is not a contraindication to pregnancy, but does require additional expertise and patient engagement. In this review, we summarise the various pregnancy-related considerations in patients with IAS and IC, including the impact of physiologic/hemodynamic changes on heart failure progression or arrhythmia propensity, maternal and fetal pregnancy risk stratification, prenatal genetic testing, and the specialised care and monitoring required through pregnancy, labour, and delivery and into the postpartum period. Management of patients with IASs and IC during pregnancy and the postpartum period requires collaboration between patient and provider, with a shared understanding of the general safety and potential risks during the pregnancy and postpartum periods. Patients should be aware of the safety of various medications throughout pregnancy, and those with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators should be managed according to device guidelines. A peripartum care and delivery plan should be established, with multidisciplinary input from various specialists including obstetrics, cardiac obstetrics, and inherited arrhythmia specialists wherever appropriate.

Although arrhythmias are one of the most frequent consultations during pregnancy, fortunately the majority are benign. Usually, they are well tolerated assuming they occur in patients with structurally normal hearts. However, pregnancy adds a new aspect to the so called "arrhythmia tolerance", because arrhythmia and therapy may jeopardize the fetus. For acute treatment of narrow and wide tachycardias, with few exceptions, antiarrhythmic medications appear to be safe. In addition to the relative security of drugs such as adenosine, digoxin, propranolol, procainamide and flecainide, we could use direct current countershock with no evidence of significant complications. Because no drug is absolutely safe, chronic pharmacologic therapy is best avoided during pregnancy. Finally, radiofrequency ablation could be recommended as an alternative in women with previous tachycardias who would like to become pregnant.

Cardiac stress can induce morphological, structural and functional changes of the heart, referred to as cardiac remodeling. Myocardial infarction or sustained overload as a result of pathological causes such as hypertension or valve insufficiency may result in progressive remodeling and finally lead to heart failure (HF). Whereas pathological and physiological (exercise, pregnancy) overload both stimulate cardiomyocyte growth (hypertrophy), only pathological remodeling is characterized by increased deposition of extracellular matrix proteins, termed fibrosis, and loss of cardiomyocytes by necrosis, apoptosis and/or phagocytosis. HF is strongly associated with age, and cardiomyocyte loss and fibrosis are typical signs of the aging heart. Fibrosis results in stiffening of the heart, conductivity problems and reduced oxygen diffusion, and is associated with diminished ventricular function and arrhythmias. As a consequence, the workload of cardiomyocytes in the fibrotic heart is further augmented, whereas the physiological environment is becoming less favorable. This causes additional cardiomyocyte death and replacement of lost cardiomyocytes by fibrotic material, generating a vicious cycle of further decline of cardiac function. Breaking this fibrosis-cell death axis could halt further pathological and age-related cardiac regression and potentially reverse remodeling. In this review, we will describe the interaction between cardiac fibrosis, cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and cell death, and discuss potential strategies for tackling progressive cardiac remodeling and HF.

During pregnancy a number of rhythm disturbances can occur in both the mother and fetus; these may range from benign ectopy to life-threatening arrhythmias. With a clear understanding of the maternal hemodynamic changes associated with pregnancy, and the appropriate antiarrhythmic therapies available, almost all such cases can be treated successfully. Although no drug is completely safe, most are well tolerated and can be given with relatively low risk. Drug therapy should be avoided during the first trimester of pregnancy if possible and drugs with the longest record of safety should be used as first-line therapy. Conservative therapies should be used when appropriate. Several drug options exist for most maternal and fetal arrhythmias.

INTRODUCTION:Pregnancy can precipitate or exacerbate cardiac arrhythmias. Management of those arrhythmias is not very different from that in non-pregnant women. OBJECTIVE:In this review we tried to specify factors which favour arrhythmias in pregnant women and to show their specific management. METHODS:We carried out a search through PubMed using as keywords: pregnancy, cardiac arrhythmias, antiarrhythmics. RESULTS:Hemodynamic perturbations, direct electrophysiological effects of hormones and underlying heart disease are potential factors that can promote arrhythmias in pregnancy. Usually, no drug therapy is needed for the management of supraventricular or ventricular premature beats but potential promoting factors should be eliminated. In paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, vagal maneuvers should be tried firstly. Adenosine could be used if vagal maneuvers are ineffective. In pregnant women with atrial fibrillation, the goal of treatment is the conversion to sinus rhythm or the control of ventricular rate. Ventricular arrhythmias are usually uncommon during pregnancy and often occur in the absence of structural heart disease and are responsive to drug therapy. Symptomatic bradycardia rarely complicates pregnancy and its management does not differ from that in non-pregnant women.

Congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a genetic disorder characterized by a prolonged QT interval in the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) that predisposes affected individuals to arrhythmic syncope, ventricular torsades-de-pointes, and sudden cardiac death at a young age. Investigations of large patient cohorts revealed sex-related differences in the LQTS phenotype. Adult women with LQTS are at higher risk for cardiac arrhythmias than are adult men with LQTS. Sex hormones are thought to play the primary role for these gender differences. Clinical experience and translational studies indicated that females with LQTS have a lower risk for cardiac arrhythmias during pregnancy and elevated risk in the postpartum period due to contrasting effects of estradiol and progesterone, as well as postpartum hormones on the action potential and arrhythmia substrate. However, this pro- or anti-arrhythmic potential of hormones varies depending on the underlying genotype, partly since sex hormones have distinct effects on different (affected) cardiac ion channels. Thus, a comprehensive evaluation of women with LQTS prior to and during pregnancy, during labor, and in the postpartum period with consideration of the patient's disease- and gene-specific risk factors is essential to providing precision management in this patient group. This review discusses the current understanding of hormonal influences in LQTS and provides practical guidance for the optimal management of LQTS patients during pregnancy, delivery, and the postpartum period.

The overall incidence of sudden cardiac death is considerably lower among women than men, reflecting significant and often under-recognized sex differences. Women are older at time of sudden cardiac death, less likely to have a prior cardiac diagnosis, and less likely to have coronary artery disease identified on postmortem examination. They are more likely to experience their death at home, during sleep, and less likely witnessed. Women are also more likely to present in pulseless electrical activity or systole rather than ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia. Conversely, women are less likely to receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation or receive cardiac intervention post-arrest. Underpinning sex disparities in sudden cardiac death is a paucity of women recruited to clinical trials, coupled with an overall lack of prespecified sex-disaggregated evidence. Thus, predominantly male-derived data form the basis of clinical guidelines. This review outlines the critical sex differences concerning epidemiology, cause, risk factors, prevention, and outcomes. We propose 4 broad areas of importance to consider: physiological, personal, community, and professional factors.

Adenosine produces acute inhibition of sinus node and atrioventricular (AV) nodal function. This profound but short lived electrophysiologic effect makes adenosine a suitable agent for treating supraventricular tachycardias (SVT) that incorporate the sinus node or AV node as part of the arrhythmia circuit, or for unmasking atrial tachyarrhythmias or ventricular pre-excitation. Its antiadrenergic properties also make it an effective agent for use with some unique atrial and ventricular tachycardias. Appropriate dosing and rapid bolusing with intravenous administration is required. Recognition of infrequent proarrhythmic risks and potential drug interactions with xanthine derivatives and dipyridamole should maximize its safe and effective use. This review will highlight adenosine's mechanism of action, administration, clinical indications, efficacy, and risks when used in tachyarrhythmic management.

Electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic differences between men and women have long been noted. Women have a higher intrinsic heart rate than men, along with a longer corrected QT interval and a shorter sinus nodal recovery time. The incidence of and risk factors for a variety of arrhythmias differ between men and women. Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia has a 2:1 female-to-male predominance, while accessory pathways are twice as frequent in men. Although atrial fibrillation is more prevalent in men of all age groups, the absolute numbers of men and women with atrial fibrillation are equal, and the associated morbidity and mortality experienced by women with atrial fibrillation appear to be worse. Women have a lower incidence of sudden cardiac death, and female survivors of sudden cardiac death have a lower frequency of spontaneous or inducible ventricular tachycardia. On the other hand, drug-induced torsade de pointes and symptomatic long QT syndrome have a female predominance. Therefore, greater caution should be used when prescribing QT-prolonging drugs in women. The incidence of arrhythmias is increased during pregnancy, and management of pregnant patients poses a significant challenge. The mechanisms of these gender differences are unclear but may be related to hormonal effects and the shorter QT interval in adult males. Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies are usually equally efficacious, but the risks of pharmacologic therapy are different in men and women. Atrial fibrillation may be more difficult to treat in women.

Physiologic changes in pregnancy can place extra demands on cardiac function. Preconception counseling is key to improving pregnancy outcomes. The most commonly encountered cardiac events are pulmonary edema and dysrhythmias. A team approach to antepartum care is recommended and should include maternal-fetal medicine, cardiology, and anesthesia as indicated, particularly for patients with congenital cardiac disease.

About one per cent of all pregnancies are affected by maternal heart disease, which may have significant influence on the maternal and foetal outcome. In this context rheumatic heart disease is declining and congenital heart disease is becoming the dominant category. Our experience of pregnancy in the new groups of patients created by paediatric heart surgery is scant and a continuous update is required.

Pregnant women have an increased risk of having the usual arrhythmias seen in women of childbearing age. Most of these are benign sinus tachycardias or bradycardias or atrial and ventricular ectopic beats. Women who have had sustained supraventricular or ventricular tachycardias before pregnancy frequently develop them during pregnancy. These arrhythmias often have enough hemodynamic significance to decrease uterine blood flow, which adds a sense of urgency for treatment. The management is similar to that of nonpregnant women, with nuances important for the protection of the developing fetus.

The number of patients of reproductive age with inherited and congenital heart disease receiving implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD) is steadily increasing. Safely and effectively coordinating pregnancy in this high-risk cohort is important to optimise maternal-foetal outcomes. As members of the multidisciplinary team caring for pregnant patients with indications for ICD, cardiologists and electrophysiologists should be aware of the considerations and nuances involved in managing these patients. This article reviews the pathophysiology of arrhythmias, ICD implantation considerations, novel minimal fluoroscopy techniques and subcutaneous ICD. In addition, antenatal and device management during pregnancy and delivery are discussed.

Palpitation is an unpleasant awareness of an abnormal beating of the heart. This symptom may be brought on by a variety of cardiac disorders, such as cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, and coronary artery disease, but the most common cause is primary cardiac arrhythmias. Several noncardiac disorders may also cause palpitations, and in this case are an effect of the disease upon cardiac rhythm. Palpitations occur frequently in women at all ages, especially during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, during pregnancy, and during the perimenopausal period. Palpitations occurring at young age and associated with fast heart rate are frequently due to Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome or other forms of re-entrant tachycardia, and may require catheter ablation. A correlation between ovarian hormones and occurrence of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia has recently been reported in female patients with normal menstrual cycles; palpitations are frequently reported in cases of mitral valve prolapse, whereas episodes of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia reported during pregnancy may be due to mechanical stimuli or to a suggested arrhythmogenic effect of pregnancy. Palpitations during the perimenopausal period are usually benign and seem to be related to the increased sympathetic activity caused by the menopause. Although the vast majority of palpitations are benign and need not be treated, an electrophysiological study is indicated for those patients who have a documented episode of palpitation associated with syncope or with a pulse that is inappropriately rapid during symptoms. The treatment of palpitations due to cardiac arrhythmias is dependent upon the kind of arrhythmia detected during either invasive or noninvasive electrophysiological studies.

During pregnancy, there are a number of important changes to cardiovascular function which are necessary for progression of a successful pregnancy. Additionally, preexisting cardiovascular conditions can be exacerbated by the adaptations that occur during gestation. These can present serious therapeutic challenges in the management of the cardiology patient during pregnancy. Significantly, the number of pregnant women at risk of cardiovascular complications is on the rise, so identification of risk factors that predict cardiac outcomes is essential to proper screening of the obstetrical patient. In diagnosed preexisting conditions, such as pulmonary hypertension, counseling is important prior to pregnancy. In the case of underlying disorders unmasked by pregnancy, or new-onset complications like preeclampsia, appropriate monitoring and treatment of the cardiovascular complications is warranted. Ultimately, collaborative care by both obstetricians and cardiologists is essential for the successful resolution of cardiovascular dysfunction in the obstetrical patient.

Disruption of cardiac electrical activity resulting in palpitations and syncope is often an early symptom of pregnancy. Pregnancy is a time of dramatic and dynamic physiological and hormonal changes during which numerous demands are placed on the heart. These changes result in electrical remodelling which can be detected as changes in the electrocardiogram (ECG). This gestational remodelling is a very under-researched area. There are no systematic large studies powered to determine changes in the ECG from pre-pregnancy, through gestation, and into the postpartum period. The large variability between patients and the dynamic nature of pregnancy hampers interpretation of smaller studies, but some facts are consistent. Gestational cardiac hypertrophy and a physical shift of the heart contribute to changes in the ECG. There are also electrical changes such as an increased heart rate and lengthening of the QT interval. There is an increased susceptibility to arrhythmias during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Some changes in the ECG are clearly the result of changes in ion channel expression and behaviour, but little is known about the ionic basis for this electrical remodelling. Most information comes from animal models, and implicates changes in the delayed-rectifier channels. However, it is likely that there are additional roles for sodium channels as well as changes in calcium homoeostasis. The changes in the electrical profile of the heart during pregnancy and the postpartum period have clear implications for the safety of pregnant women, but the field remains relatively undeveloped.

The incidence and risk factors for a variety of arrhythmias differ among men and women. Although symptomatic atrial reentrant tachycardias have a female predominance, the reverse is true for atrial fibrillation. Women have a lower incidence of sudden death. On the other hand, drug-induced torsades de pointes and symptomatic long QT syndrome have a female predominance. The incidence of arrhythmias seem to be increased during pregnancy. The mechanisms of these gender differences are unclear but may be related to hormonal effects and the shorter QT interval in men. Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapy are equally efficacious in men and women.

Pregnancy is associated with major structural and hemodynamic changes in the cardiovascular system that predispose women to an increased risk of atrial fibrillation. While these changes generally resolve after parturition, the impact of subsequent pregnancies on the risk of atrial fibrillation is unknown. We searched through PubMed for studies that have investigated the impact of multiparity on the risk of atrial fibrillation. The following Medical Subject Headings terms were used: ([repeated pregnancies] OR parity) AND ([Atrial fibrillation] OR AF). Studies with complete data were included in the current study. Out of 135 studies identified through the prespecified criteria, we selected 2 studies with relevant data. Increasing number of pregnancies was associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation in a dose-response relationship. Our systematic review suggests that multiparity is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation. More studies are warranted to elucidate the association between repeated pregnancies and atrial fibrillation.

Cardiac arrhythmias are the most common cardiac complication reported in pregnant women with and without structural heart disease (SHD); they are more frequent among women with SHD, such as cardiomyopathy and congenital heart disease (CHD). While older studies had indicated supraventricular tachycardia as the most common tachyarrhythmia in pregnancy, more recent data indicate an increase in the frequency of arrhythmias, with atrial fibrillation (AF) emerging as the most frequent arrhythmia in pregnancy, attributed to an increase in maternal age, cardiovascular risk factors and CHD in pregnancy. Importantly, the presence of any tachyarrhythmia during pregnancy may be associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, including death. Thus, both the mother and the offspring need to be protected from such consequences. The use of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) depends on clinical presentation and on the presence of underlying SHD, which requires caution as it promotes pro-arrhythmia. In hemodynamically compromised women, electrical cardioversion is successful and safe to both mother and fetus. Use of beta-blockers appears quite safe; however, caution is advised when using other AADs, while no AAD should be used, if at all possible, during the first trimester when organogenesis takes place. Regarding the anticoagulation regimen in patients with AF, warfarin should be substituted with heparin during the first trimester, while direct oral anticoagulants are not indicated given the lack of data in pregnancy. Finally, for refractory arrhythmias, ablation and/or device implantation can be performed with current techniques in pregnant women, when needed, using minimal exposure to radiation. All these issues and relevant current guidelines are herein reviewed.

Pregnant women often complain of palpitations. The differential diagnosis for new-onset palpitations in pregnancy ranges from benign conditions to life-threatening arrhythmias. Maternal arrhythmias can occur in isolation or in the setting of underlying structural heart disease. Optimal management of maternal cardiac arrhythmias includes identification of the specific arrhythmia, diagnosis of comorbid conditions, and appropriate intervention. In general, management of maternal cardiac arrhythmias is similar to that of the general population. Special consideration must be given as to the effects of medications and procedures on both the mother and fetus to optimize outcomes. The importance of multidisciplinary care with cardiology, obstetrics, and anesthesia is emphasized.

AIM:Maternal complete heart block (CHB), which manifests for the first time during pregnancy and peurperium, poses a challenge to treating physicians. We present here four cases that were diagnosed during pregnancy and peurperium, and we discuss their management issues. METHODS:A retrospective analysis of a 3-year period was carried out in a referral hospital in northern India. The course of pregnancy, disease and perinatal outcome in women with CHB diagnosed during pregnancy was studied. RESULTS:Of the four patients who presented with CHB, only one had a structural cardiac lesion (corrected transposition of great arteries). All of the women had an uneventful delivery. Two women were given prophylactic temporary pacing before labor and three women required subsequent permanent pacing. Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) was present in two babies and preterm labor occurred in one patient. None of the neonates had any rhythm disturbances. CONCLUSION:When a multidisciplinary approach is used, both maternal and neonatal outcomes are good. The incidence of IUGR and preterm birth may be on the increase; hence, clinical vigilance for these conditions is warranted.

BACKGROUND:Atrial fibrillation (AF) constitutes a relatively infrequent pregnancy complication, which may be a therapeutic Gordian knot. Indeed, sparse data exist regarding the prevalence, prognosis, and management of AF during pregnancy. In general, AF occurs as a benign, self-limited arrhythmia, but occasionally may have severe hemodynamic consequences in pregnant patients suffering from heart failure, congenital heart disease, or other comorbidities. Extra-cardiac causes of AF should always be meticulously excluded. REVIEW:Treatment decisions are difficult, since medications may cross the placental barrier and potentially affect fetal growth and organogenesis, or even result in fetal bradyarrhythmias. Treatment goals are not differentiated in comparison to those regarding AF occurring in the general population. Still, while maternal treatment is prioritized, issues regarding fetal health must deliberately be considered. Consequently, hemodynamic instability is to be promptly treated with synchronized electrical cardioversion. In contrast, in stable patients, pharmacologic cardioversion, under appropriate antithrombotic regimen, should be attempted. Selection of appropriate antithrombotic therapy, including novel oral anticoagulants, imposes further difficulties on therapeutic decision-making. Further clinical trials are warranted in order to assess the pathophysiology and prognosis of AF in pregnancy and ameliorate the evidence-based therapeutic strategy in this specific group of the population.

The incidence of cardiac arrhythmias is estimated et 1.2 per 1000 pregnancies, usually in the third trimester and 50% of them are asymptomatic. They may appear for the first time in pregnancy or have a recurring character An important risk factor related to their appearance is the presence of structural heart disease, which complicates < 1% of pregnancies. Generally the symptoms are mild and the treatment is not necessary but in some cases pharmacotherapy is necessary Pharmacotherapy must be a compromise between the potentially adverse effects of drugs on the fetus and the beneficial effects on the cardiovascular system of the mother. Due to the development of cardiac surgery many women with heart defects reach reproductive age and become pregnant. Therefore this problem will be faced more and more often in clinical practice. In addition to pharmacological methods some cardiac arrhythmias may require urgent, life-saving procedures. External electrical cardioversion is associated with the application of certain amount of energy via two electrodes placed on the thorax. It is used to treat hemodynamically unstable supraventricular tachycardias, including atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter Also in hemodynamically stable patients in whom drug therapy was ineffective elective electrical cardioversion can be use to convert cardiac arrhythmia to sinus rhythm. We present a case of a 33 years old patient with congenital heart disease surgically corrected in childhood who had first incident of atrial flutter in pregnancy. Arrhytmia occured in 26th week of gestation. The patient was hemodynamically stable and did not approve electrical cardioversion as a method of treatment therefore pharmacotherapy was started. Heart rate was controled with metoprolol and digoxin, warfarin was used to anticoagulation. Calcium and potassium were also given. Described therapy did not convert atrial flutter to sinus rhythm therefore in 33rd week of gestation after patient's approval electrical cardioversion was performed. Before cardioversion transesophageal echocardiogram was made to exclude the presence of thrombus inside atria. Energy of 50J was applied and sinus rhythm was restored. Cardiotocography during and after cardioversion did not show any significant fetal heart rate changes. Further pregnancy and puerperium were uneventful. Case report and review of the literature about cardiac arrhytmias and methods of its treatment especially in pregnant women. Analysis of medical documentation of the patient treated in the Department of Cardiology as well as in the Department of Obstetrics and Perinatology Medical University of Lublin. Review of abstracts and papers in the Medline database about heart arrhytmias occuring during pregnancy methods of their treatment, with special refference to electrical cardioversion. Pregnancy is a condition which predisposes to cardiac arrhytmias. It is associated with changes in cardiovascular system of pregnant women that appear physiologically They can be effectively treated with low risk for mother and fetus. Electrical cardioversion is an effective and safe method of therapy of supraventricular arrhytmias also during pregnancy The adaptation of the maternal hemostasis in pregnancy predisposes women to an increased risk of thromboembolism therefore anticoagulant therapy is essential to minimize the risk of embolic episodes and stroke during elective cardioversion. Pregnant women with structural or functional heart diseases should be under supervision of multidiscyplinary team of specialists (obstetricians, cardiologists, neonatologists, pediatricians).

Cardiac arrhythmia is one of the most common reasons for cardiac consultation during pregnancy. Fortunately, malignant arrhythmias during the course of normal gestation are rare, and the relatively common complaint of palpitations is usually due to benign arrhythmias. However, in pregnant patients with organic heart disease, arrhythmias are often triggered by the haemodynamic burden of pregnancy and may be the first manifestation of the disease. In addition, rhythm abnormalities in patients with limited cardiac reserves may have significant haemodynamic consequences and can compromise fetal well-being. Any woman who presents with rhythm disorders during pregnancy should undergo a diagnostic evaluation to rule out an underlying disease, including cardiac, pulmonary, endocrine, or metabolic disease. Additionally, removal of precipitating factors, such as excessive ingestion of caffeine and/or alcohol, cigarette smoking, drug abuse or therapy with arrhythmogenic compounds, is indicated (as these measures are desirable in any pregnant woman). Antiarrhythmic drug therapy is indicated in such patients only in symptomatic or haemodynamically significant arrhythmias. In cases where organic heart disease or any other cause for arrhythmia is identified, the underlying disease should be treated first. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy is indicated when arrhythmias persist or as a prophylactic measure. In principle, the approach to drug therapy in pregnant patients is similar to that in non-pregnant patients. However, special consideration should be given to drug selection in order to avoid adverse effects to the fetus. Those antiarrhythmics that have been shown to be relatively safe during pregnancy include digoxin, quinidine, procainamide, some beta-blocking drugs and lignocaine (lidocaine). In addition to careful drug selection, the smallest effective dose should be used and the indication for antiarrhythmic therapy should be periodically reassessed during the course of pregnancy.

Atrial premature beats are frequently diagnosed during pregnancy. Supraventricular tachycardia (atrial tachycardia, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, circus movement tachycardia) is diagnosed less frequently. For acute therapy, electrical cardioversion with 50 to 100 J is indicated in all unstable patients. In stable supraventricular tachycardia, the initial therapy includes vagal maneuvers to terminate tachycardias. For short-term management, when vagal maneuvers fail, intravenous adenosine is the first choice drug and may safely terminate the arrhythmia. Ventricular premature beats are also frequently present during pregnancy and are benign in most patients; however, malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias (sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular flutter, or ventricular fibrillation) may occur. Electrical cardioversion is necessary in all patients who are hemodynamically unstable with life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias. In hemodynamically stable patients, initial therapy with ajmaline, procainamide, or lidocaine is indicated. In patients with syncopal ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, ventricular flutter, or aborted sudden death, an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is indicated. In patients with symptomatic bradycardia, a pacemaker can be implanted using echocardiography at any stage of pregnancy. The treatment of the pregnant patient with cardiac arrhythmias requires important modifications of the standard practice of arrhythmia management. The goal of therapy is to protect the patient and fetus through delivery, after which chronic or definitive therapy can be administered.

Pregnancy is a period of increased cardiovascular risk in a woman's life. In the setting of an inherited arrhythmia syndrome (IAS), cardiologists and obstetricians may be unfamiliar with cardiovascular optimization and risk stratification in pregnancy. Historically, there were little data addressing the safety of pregnancy in these rare disorders. Recent advances suggest that no type of IAS represents an absolute contraindication to pregnancy. However, it is imperative that obstetric and cardiovascular clinicians understand the major forms of IAS and how they affect the risks and course of pregnancy. This includes any disease-specific proarrhythmic triggers unique to pregnancy, such as the postpartum period in long QT syndrome (especially type 2), which poses the greatest risk of arrhythmias, and the adrenergic nature of labor and delivery, which is relevant to catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Fortunately, several effective antiarrhythmic options exist that pose little fetal risk. IAS-specific optimization of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator algorithms, drug therapy, and a maternal cardiac plan addressing the antepartum, labor, and delivery and postpartum periods reduces the risk. Where evidence does not exist, there are plausible mechanistic considerations to guide clinicians. To achieve optimal outcomes, early involvement of an expert pregnancy heart team comprising obstetrics, genetics, cardiology, and anesthesiology team members and a shared decision-making approach to IAS issues in pregnancy are needed.

We have summarized the care management of pregnant women with complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) by reviewing data from the published literature as well as our own experience in 32 pregnancies. Obstetrical management of women with a permanent pacemaker implanted prior to conception has been sufficiently reported thus far, and the management of such patients is considered to be of low risk. Since CAVB usually does not cause any specific obstetrical problems during pregnancy, prepregnancy prophylactic placement of a permanent pacemaker is not indicated in all asymptomatic patients. However, when asymptomatic women without pacemakers become pregnant, there is a subset that ultimately develops heart failure during pregnancy. Therefore, close surveillance of pregnant patients with CAVB is warranted. The current increase in the use of permanent pacemakers in young women with symptomatic CAVB will certainly limit the need for intrapartum temporary pacing in patients who do not require a pacemaker before pregnancy. In fact, most women with CAVB, who do not require a permanent pacemaker before delivery, can be safely managed during labor without temporary pacing. However, the clinical symptoms and cardiac function of patients should be carefully followed after delivery, even when pregnancy and delivery are uneventful.

OBJECTIVE:Pregnancy can trigger maternal tachycardias, and the onset of recurrent or incessant focal atrial tachycardia (AT) can lead to tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. Medical interventions are commonly employed, but they carry potential fetal and maternal risks. Catheter ablation (CA), particularly with non-fluoroscopic navigation systems, may be considered as an alternative. This systematic review aims to explore the feasibility and outcomes of CA for focal AT during pregnancy. METHODS:A thorough literature search was conducted until September 30th, 2023, on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Included articles described maternal focal ATs diagnosed through electrophysiological studies and treated with CA. Data derived from these studies were organized into tables and subsequently analyzed. RESULTS:Out of 278 papers reviewed, 15 articles involving 24 patients were retrieved. CA, utilizing radiofrequency energy achieved acute success in 95.8% of cases. Sixteen patients (66.7%) underwent complete fluoroless procedures, with two adverse events directly related to the procedure reported. Long-term follow-up revealed minimal AT recurrences, with a 0.06% arrhythmia burden in one case. CONCLUSION:Focal ATs during pregnancy can be incessant and refractory to medical intervention, precipitating an acute decline in left ventricular ejection fraction. In this setting, CA emerges as an efficacious treatment modality, particularly in cases of tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathies. Whenever feasible, it is advisable to perform these procedures with minimal or no fluoroscopy guidance. Larger studies are needed to establish the safety and the efficacy of CA for focal ATs during pregnancy, as current research consists of case reports or small case series.

When deciding on antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) treatment, a thorough knowledge of the physiological adaptation processes that occur during pregnancy and their effect on metabolism and the efficacy of AAD is mandatory. Beyond the desired effects of AAD therapy, side effects can occur in pregnant women. Furthermore, potential harm to fetal development-depending on gestational age-needs to be considered. A thorough evaluation of potential risks opposed to expected benefits for mother and fetus should be carried out before initiation of AAD treatment. Regular maternal echocardiography and fetal sonographic examination during pregnancy under AAD treatment are advisable. If possible, serum concentrations of AAD should be measured on a regular basis. Due to electrolyte and volume imbalances after delivery, maternal monitoring is recommended for approximately 48 h under AAD therapy. Current guidelines are based on almost historic analyses, where AAD were often prescribed for other indications than rhythm disorders. In clinical practice, AAD predominantly used during pregnancy are intravenous adenosine for acute treatment of atrioventricular nodal dependent tachycardias, whereas betablockers, sotalol, and flecainide can be orally administered for long-term therapy.

As more women with repaired congenital heart disease survive to their reproductive years and many other women are delaying pregnancy until later in life, a rising concern is the risk of cardiac arrhythmias during pregnancy. Naturally occurring cardiovascular changes during pregnancy increase the likelihood that a recurrence of a previously experienced cardiac arrhythmia or a de novo arrhythmia will occur. Arrhythmias should be thoroughly investigated to determine if there is a reversible etiology, and risks/benefits of treatment options should be fully explored. We discuss the approach to working up and treating various arrhythmias during pregnancy with attention to fetal and maternal risks as well as treatment of fetal arrhythmias. Acute management in stable patients includes close monitoring and intravenous pharmacologic therapy, while DC cardioversion should be used to terminate arrhythmias in hemodynamically unstable patients. Long-term management may require continued oral antiarrhythmic therapy, with particular attention to fetal safety, to prevent complications associated with arrhythmias.

INTRODUCTION:An increased incidence of maternal cardiac arrhythmias is observed during pregnancy and they can range from clinically irrelevant isolated premature beats to debilitating supraventricular and ventricular tachycardias. DISCUSSION:Management of arrhythmias during pregnancy is similar to that in non-pregnant patients. However, the presence of the foetus and the risk of teratogenicity, the haemodynamic changes, the effect of therapy on labour, delivery and lactation must be evaluated. Antiarrhythmic drug selection depends on the specific arrhythmia being treated and the cardiac condition of the mother. Although no drug is completely safe, most are well tolerated and can be given with relatively low risk. Some antiarrhythmic agents, such as propranolol, metoprolol, digoxin and quinidine, have been extensively tested during pregnancy and have proved to be safe; they should therefore, whenever possible, be used as a first-line. For supraventricular tachycardia, intravenous adenosine may be used to terminate the arrhythmia if vagal manoeuvres fail. If possible, drug therapy should be avoided during the first trimester of pregnancy. When drug treatment fails or is not indicated because of the haemodynamic instability of the patient, direct current cardioversion can be used. CONCLUSION:Most patients with arrhythmias during pregnancy can be treated with an excellent result.

: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is rare during pregnancy but its incidence is expected to rise in parallel to increasing age of women in pregnancy and fraction of pregnant women with structural heart disease. : The authors provide a review of the contemporary evidence on diagnostic work-up and optimal pharmacotherapeutic management of AF in pregnancy. The authors have performed a systematic search for relevant articles using MEDLINE, the COCHRANE LIBRARY, and ClinicalTrials.gov. : New-onset AF during pregnancy is usually an indication of underlying heart disease and should lead to hospital admission. Patients should be evaluated by an experienced cardiologist or an electrophysiologist. Direct cardioversion is highly effective and safe in pregnant women and should be prioritized over pharmacologic cardioversion with intravenous ibutilide or flecainide. Amiodarone should be avoided if possible. Digoxin and beta-blockers are the rate-control pharmaceutic agents with the widest experience of use. Catheter ablation during pregnancy should be considered in selected cases of atrial flutter refractory to medication and only performed using fluoroless techniques, preferably during the second trimester. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) can be used after the first trimester, while low molecular weight heparin should be accompanied by periodic evaluation of anti-Xa factor. Non-VKA oral anticoagulants should be avoided because of limited experience in pregnancy.

A substantial number of pregnant women at some point experience cardiac arrhythmia, which is mostly treated by antiarrhythmic medication. In some instances, arrhythmias can be drug-resistant and pose a relevant risk to both mother and unborn child as they can result in hemodynamic compromise. In recent years, invasive electrophysiology procedures have been carried out with ever reducing exposure to ionising radiation, and multiple techniques have been established to achieve ZERO exposure. Of course, these techniques should all be applied when contemplating an invasive mapping and ablation procedure during pregnancy. The role of the cardio-obstetrics team in planning and performing such procedures is paramount. Careful assessment of the pregnant mother and her unborn child is mandatory. Only with good preparation is a complete understanding of both cardiac anatomy and physiology achievable, which is a pre-requisite of a successful ablation outcome. Various aspects of the ablation procedure itself are discussed and evaluated from the perspective of all team members involved, including the obstetrician, the anaesthetist and the electrophysiologist. This review aims to inform the reader about the techniques available and reports on the published outcomes for ablations during pregnancy in the last decade.

OBJECTIVE:To report outcomes in a recent series of pregnancies in women with pulmonary hypertension (PH). DESIGN:Retrospective case note review. SETTING:Tertiary referral unit (Chelsea and Westminster and Royal Brompton Hospitals). SAMPLE:Twelve pregnancies in nine women with PH between 1995 and 2010. METHODS:Multidisciplinary review of case records. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity. RESULTS:There were two maternal deaths (1995 and 1998), one related to pre-eclampsia and one to arrhythmia. Maternal morbidity included postpartum haemorrhage (five cases), and one post-caesarean evacuation of a wound haematoma. There were no perinatal deaths, nine live births and three first-trimester miscarriages. Mean birthweight was 2197 g, mean gestational age was 34 weeks (range 26-39), and mean birthweight centile was 36 (range 5-60). Five babies required admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, but were all eventually discharged home. All women were delivered by caesarean section (seven elective and two emergency deliveries), under general anaesthetic except for one emergency and one elective caesarean performed under regional block. CONCLUSIONS:Maternal and fetal outcomes for women with PH may be improving. However, the risk of maternal mortality remains significant, so that early and effective counselling about contraceptive options and pregnancy risks should continue to play a major role in the management of such women when they reach reproductive maturity.

Maternal and fetal arrhythmias occurring during pregnancy may jeopardise the life of the mother and the fetus. When arrhythmias are well tolerated and patients are minimally symptomatic, conservative therapy, such as observation and rest or vagal manoeuvres, should be employed. When arrhythmias cause debilitating symptoms or haemodynamic compromise, antiarrhythmic drug therapy is indicated. Although no antiarrhythmic drug is completely safe during pregnancy, most are well tolerated and can be given with relatively low risk. Physiological changes that occur during pregnancy mandate caution when administering antiarrhythmic drugs, with close monitoring of serum concentration and patient response. Drug therapy should be avoided during the first trimester of pregnancy if possible, and drugs with the longest record of safety should be used as first-line therapy. Several therapeutic options exist for most arrhythmias in the mother and fetus. Of the class IA agents, quinidine has the longest record of safety during pregnancy, and is generally well tolerated. Procainamide is also well tolerated, and should be a first line option for acute treatment of undiagnosed wide complex tachycardia. All IA agents should be administered in the hospital under cardiac monitoring due to the potential risk of ventricular arrhythmias (torsade de pointes). The IB agent, lidocaine (lignocaine), has local anaesthetic role but is also generally well tolerated as an antiarrhythmic agents. Phenytoin should be avoided due to the high risk of congenital malformations and limited role as an antiarrhythmic drug. Of the IC agents, flecainide has been shown to be very effective in treating fetal supraventricular tachycardia complicated by hydrops. Beta-Blockers are generally well tolerated and can be used with relative safety in pregnancy, although recent data suggest that they may cause intrauterine growth retardation if they are administered during the first trimester. Amiodarone, a class II agents with characteristics of the other antiarrhythmic drug classes, has been reported to cause congenital abnormalities; it should be avoided during the first trimester and used only to treat life-threatening arrhythmias that fail to respond to other therapies. Adenosine is generally safe to use in pregnancy, and is the drug of choice for acute termination of maternal supraventricular tachycardia. Digoxin has a long track record of treating both maternal and fetal arrhythmias, and is one of the safest antiarrhythmics to use during pregnancy. Direct current cardioversion to terminate maternal arrhythmias is well tolerated and effective, and should not be delayed if indicated. The use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator should be considered for women of childbearing potential with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.

Sudden death accounts for 300,000-400,000 deaths annually in the United States. Most sudden deaths are cardiac, and most sudden cardiac deaths are related to arrhythmias secondary to structural heart disease or primary electrical abnormalities of the heart. The most common structural disease leading to sudden death is ischemic heart disease. Nonischemic cardiomyopathy and other structural abnormalities such as arrhythmogenic ventricular dysplasia and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy may also be causative. Patients without structural disease have a primary electrical abnormality, such as long-QT syndrome or Brugada syndrome. Severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction is the main marker for sudden death in patients with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. In other conditions, other markers for structural heart disease and electrical abnormalities need to be considered. It is seen that β-blocker therapy is associated with a reduction in sudden cardiac death across a broad range of disorders. Nevertheless, the implantable cardioverter defibrillator remains the most effective treatment strategy in selected patients.

Cardiac disease is the leading cause of maternal mortality in the developed world. The majority of women with heart disease are able to successfully undergo pregnancy. However, in women with severely impaired ventricular function, severe left heart obstruction, pulmonary hypertension and aortopathy, such as Marfan syndrome, with significant aortic dilatation, pregnancy is associated with a significant risk, and these women should be counselled against pregnancy if there is no option for treatment that reduces risk. Although there are increasing numbers of women with congenital heart disease who are considering pregnancy, as a result of joint expert specialist cardiac and obstetric care, maternal mortality is low. Most of the observed mortality occurs in women with structurally normal hearts who were not known to have heart disease before their pregnancy. It is therefore important that those caring for pregnant women are aware of the risk factors for and presentation of cardiac conditions in pregnancy. We review the presentation and management of both congenital and acquired heart diseases in pregnancy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW:Maternal tachycardia is a common sign with a multitude of causes. We attempt to look at the most common sinister ones in the postpartum period. RECENT FINDINGS:Current guidelines differ in the definition of maternal tachycardia. It has been associated with adverse outcomes such as increased length of stay as well as higher mortality if there is underlying peripartum cardiomyopathy. Some recent studies look at common investigations and how these apply to peripartum women, such as ECG markers of arrhythmogenesis, reference ranges for PCT and echocardiogram findings during pregnancy prior to diagnosis of peripartum cardiomyopathy. SUMMARY:Physiological changes make it difficult to interpret maternal tachycardia and thus how best to manage it. We propose the idea of a three-step approach for the assessment of patients, aiming to identify causes including tachyarrhythmias, obstetric haemorrhage, sepsis, venous thromboembolism and peripartum cardiomyopathy.The first step 'BEDSIDE' applies to all patients looking at observations, history and examination. The second step 'BASIC', applies to most patients and covers ECG and basic blood tests. The final step 'EXTRA' assesses the need for further investigations including additional blood tests and imaging. By using this model, clinicians and healthcare professionals should be able to rationalise the need for more invasive investigations whilst maintain good high-quality care.

Palpitations: frequent reason for referral to a cardiologist. Arrythmia: rare, mostly benign. Premature extra-beats and sustained tachy-arrhythmias: more frequent or revealed during pregnancy. Hemodynamic changes in expectant women favor an environment conducive to arrhythmogenesis. AF and flutter: very rare unless structural heart disease or hyperthyroidism. Drugs: careful monitoring of the patient and dose adjustments. Cardioversion: only in case of severe symptoms or hemodynamically unstable.

Tachycardia in pregnancy is common, and distinguishing between physiological and pathological causes can be a challenge. Understanding the cardiovascular changes that take place in pregnancy can help to direct investigations. The finding of a persistent tachycardia, regardless of symptoms, should always prompt clinical review and consideration of investigations (such as blood tests, electrocardiography and echocardiography), where indicated. Treatment of tachyarrhythmias in pregnancy differs very little from a non-pregnant adult, and unstable arrhythmias should follow Resuscitation Council UK guidelines. Pregnant women with pathological arrhythmias need to be cared for under a multidisciplinary team, including obstetricians, obstetric anaesthetists, specialist midwives, cardiologists and obstetric physicians.

Autoimmune congenital heart block (ACHB) is a passively acquired immune-mediated disease characterized by the presence of maternal antibodies against components of the Ro/SSA and La/SSB ribonucleoprotein complex that mainly affects the cardiac conducting system. ACHB occurs in 2% of women with positive anti-Ro/SSA and anti-La/SSB antibodies and causes a high risk of intrauterine fetal death, neonatal mortality, and long-term sequelae. In this review, we first describe a case of ACHB to provide preliminary knowledge. Then, we discuss the possible pathogenic mechanisms of ACHB; summarize the pregnancy management of patients with positive anti-Ro/SSA and anti-La/SSB antibodies and/or rheumatic diseases, the prevention of ACHB, and the treatment of ACHB fetuses; and propose routine screening of these antibodies for the general population. Careful follow-up, which consists of monitoring the fetal heart rate, is feasible and reassuring for pregnant women with positive anti-Ro/SSA and/or anti-La/SSB antibodies to lower the risk of ACHB in fetuses. Moreover, maternal administration of hydroxychloroquine may be useful in preventing ACHB in pregnant women with anti-Ro/SSA and/or anti-La/SSB antibodies.

Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a complication of late pregnancy and the early postpartum period characterized by dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Approximately half of women fail to recover left ventricular function. Standard management of heart failure is indicated, with some exceptions for women who are predelivery or breastfeeding. Atrial and ventricular arrhythmias are reported in PPCM, but the frequency of arrhythmias in this condition is not well characterized. Management of PPCM-associated arrhythmias may include antiarrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation, and wearable or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Further research is needed on the prevalence, natural history, and optimal management of arrhythmias in PPCM.

The risk of arrhythmia development or recurrence is increased during pregnancy. For those arrhythmias that are unresponsive to conservative therapy, such as vagal maneuvers or life style interventions, or that present a higher risk to the mother or fetus, medical therapy may be necessary. In each case, the patient and provider must carefully consider the risks and benefits of a particular therapy. This requires an understanding of the data regarding the safety and efficacy of any particular drug, which in some cases may be extensive and in others quite limited. Fortunately, options exist for the treatment of arrhythmias during pregnancy.

A search of peer-reviewed literature was conducted to identify reports that provide data on complications associated with pregnancy in women with structural congenital heart disease (CHD). This review describes the outcome of 2,491 pregnancies, including 377 miscarriages (15%) and 114 elective abortions (5%). Important cardiac complications were seen in 11% of the pregnancies. Obstetric complications do not appear to be more prevalent. In complex CHD, premature delivery rates are high, and more children are small for gestational age. The offspring mortality was high throughout the spectrum and was related to the relatively high rate of premature delivery and recurrence of CHD.

Although familial forms of cardiomyopathy such as hypertrophic or dilated cardiomyopathy have been recognized for decades, it is only recently that much of the genetic basis of these inherited cardiomyopathies has been elucidated. This has provided important insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the disease phenotype. This increased knowledge and the availability of genetic testing has resulted in increasing numbers of mutation carriers who are being monitored, including many who are now of child-bearing age. Pregnancy is generally well tolerated in asymptomatic patients or mutation carriers with inherited cardiomyopathies. However, since pregnancy leads to major physiological changes in the cardiovascular system, in women with genetic cardiomyopathies or who carry a mutation pre-disposing to a genetic cardiomyopathy, pregnancy entails a risk of developing heart failure and/or arrhythmias. This deterioration of cardiac function may occur despite optimal medical treatment. Advanced left ventricular dysfunction, poor functional class (NYHA class III or IV), or prior cardiac events appear to increase the risk of maternal cardiac complications. However, there are no large series of cardiomyopathy patients who are regularly evaluated for cardiac complications during pregnancy and for certain types of inherited cardiomyopathy, only case reports on individual pregnancies are available. Pre-conception cardiologic evaluation and genetic counselling are important for every woman with a cardiomyopathy or a cardiomyopathy-related mutation who is considering having a family. In this article, we give an overview of the basic clinical aspects, genetics, and pregnancy outcome in women with different types of inherited cardiomyopathies. We also discuss the genetic aspects of pregnancy-associated cardiomyopathy, including peripartum cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVES:Atrial fibrillation (AF) in a structurally normal heart is rare during pregnancy. We wished to use our experience to expand the literature on the causes and management of this condition. METHODS:All members of Groupe d'Étude en Médecine Obstétricale du Québec (GÉMOQ) were invited to record cases of AF in a structurally normal heart during pregnancy to the group's Registry. We searched Medline, PubMed, and Google Scholar (1946 to 15 April 2016) for relevant articles using the key words "atrial fibrillation" and "pregnancy." RESULTS:Sixteen pregnancies with AF in 12 women were recorded in the Registry, and 19 pregnancies with AF in 18 women were retrieved from the literature. The majority (94% in the Registry and 89% in the literature) presented with paroxysmal AF. We found differences between characteristics recorded in the literature and in the Registry; these were the presence of classic triggers for AF (37% in the literature vs. 0% in the Registry), the rate of recurrence of AF in the same pregnancy (5% vs. 31%) or in subsequent pregnancies (1 vs. 4), the rate of spontaneous cardioversion (50% vs. 81%), the use of acetylsalicylic acid and/or low molecular weight heparin as stroke preventive therapy (35% vs. 71%), and the rate of AF influencing the decision to deliver (21% vs. 6%). One woman in the Registry with persistent AF had a left atrial appendage thrombus. CONCLUSION:The GÉMOQ's Registry added 12 cases (16 pregnancies) to the existing literature. AF during pregnancy is an arrhythmia that is mainly unprovoked, paroxysmal, and stable, with spontaneous cardioversion occurring usually within 24 hours. It is associated with good pregnancy outcomes.

OBJECTIVE:Since evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of acute supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SVT) in pregnancy are not available, our objective was to document published reports and immediate outcomes in this patient population. DATA SOURCES:A search of the literature was performed using Medline, Embase, CINAHL, American College of Physicians Journal Club, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Cochrance Central Register of Controlled Trials, using key word searching and citations in the English language literature from January 1950 to March 2010, on the subject of SVT. STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION:We reviewed 38 studies (case-controlled cohort studies, case series, and case reports) using the key words "supraventricular tachycardia," "paroxysmal tachycardia," and "atrial tachycardia," combined with "pregnancy" or "pregnancy complications." CONCLUSION:No randomized controlled trials have addressed the acute treatment of SVT in pregnancy. If non-invasive manoeuvres fail, adenosine should be the first-line agent for treatment if needed during the second and third trimester. There is a paucity of data on management of SVT in the first trimester.

BACKGROUND:Influenza infection is rarely associated with cardiac conduction disorder. Cardiac arrhythmias due to such an infection have a full spectrum with ventricular arrythmias being the most common. METHODS:In our systematic review from PubMed, OVID Medline and EMBASE we have identified 23 articles describing arrythmias associated with different influenza infection. Most of them were case reports where ventricular arrhythmias were the most common. RESULTS:Complete heart block after influenza infection is usually temporary and a permanent pacemaker is rarely needed. There are reports of Influenza associated with arrhythmias in adults, neonates, and even fetuses in pregnant woman. Different mechanisms were described in literatures by which influenza causes arrhythmias such as interleukin 6 & tumor necrosis factor-alpha mediated inflammatory response, sympathetic overactivation, focal myocarditis and cleavage of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 protein which is cardioprotective. CONCLUSIONS:ACE 2 binder influenza viruses have more prone to be associated with cardiac conduction disorder. Oseltamivir for influenza infection is also associated with bradycardia and can shorten or lengthen QT segment. Influenza vaccination has found to be protective from cardiac arrhythmia.

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (AC) is a rare heart muscle disease with a genetic background and autosomal dominant mode of transmission. The clinical manifestation is characterized by ventricular arrhythmias (VA), heart failure (HF) and the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Pregnancy in young female patients with AC represents a challenging condition for the life and family planning of young affected women. In addition to genetic mechanisms that influence the complex pathophysiology of AC, experimental and clinical data have confirmed the pathogenetic role of strenuous exercise and competitive sports in the early onset and rapid progression of AC symptoms and complications. Pregnancy and exercise share a number of physiological aspects of adaptation. In AC, both result in ventricular volume overload and myocardial stretch. Therefore, pregnancy has been postulated as a potential risk factor for HF, VA, SCD, and pregnancy-related obstetric complications in patients with AC. However, the available evidence on pregnancy in AC does not confirm this hypothesis. In most women with AC, pregnancies are well tolerated, uneventful, and follow a benign course. Pregnancy-related symptoms (VA, syncope, HF) and mortality, as well as obstetric complications, are uncommon in AC patients and range in the order of background populations and cohorts with AC and no pregnancy. The number of completed pregnancies is not associated with an acceleration of AC pathology or an increased risk of VA or HF during pregnancy and follow-up. Accordingly, there is no medical indication to advise against pregnancy in patients with AC. Preconditions include stability of rhythm and hemodynamics at baseline, as well as clinical follow-ups and the availability of multidisciplinary expert consultation during pregnancy and postpartum. Genetic counseling is recommended prior to pregnancy for all couples and their families affected by AC.

Atrial enlargement in response to pathological stimuli (e.g., hypertension, mitral valve disease) and physiological stimuli (exercise, pregnancy) can be comparable in magnitude, but the diseased enlarged atria is associated with complications such as atrial fibrillation (AF), whereas physiological atrial enlargement is not. Pathological atrial enlargement and AF is also observed in a small percentage of athletes undergoing extreme/intense endurance sport and pregnant women with preeclampsia. Differences between physiological and pathological atrial enlargement and underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. This review describes human and animal studies characterizing atrial enlargement under physiological and pathological conditions and highlights key knowledge gaps and clinical challenges, including: 1) the limited ability of atria to reverse remodel; and 2) distinguishing physiological and pathological enlargement via imaging/biomarkers. Finally, this review discusses how targeting distinct molecular mechanisms underlying physiological and pathological atrial enlargement could provide new therapeutic and diagnostic strategies for preventing or reversing atrial enlargement and AF.

UNLABELLED:Cardiac arrhythmias are very frequent in fetuses and newborns. The prognosis depends on the nature of the arrhythmias but is most often either spontaneously benign or following short-term medication administration. A correct diagnosis is essential for both management and prognosis. It is based on echocardiography during the fetal period and mainly on history, physical exam, and electrocardiogram after birth, but other modalities are available to record transient arrhythmic events. Irregular rhythms are mostly benign and rarely require therapy. In most fetuses and infants, tachyarrhythmias resolve spontaneously or require short-term administration of antiarrhythmics. Approximately one third of these may recur later on, especially during adolescence. Persistent bradyarrhythmias might require pacemaker implantation when associated with failure to thrive or with risk of sudden death. CONCLUSION:Arrhythmias in fetuses and infants are very common and mostly benign. History, physical exam, and recording of the arrhythmia are essential to make a correct diagnosis and establish an appropriate management for the rare potentially harmful arrhythmias.

The treatment of arrhythmias during pregnancy is complicated by concerns for fetal well-being. Although no drug is absolutely safe, most are well tolerated. Nonpharmacologic therapy includes vagal maneuvers and esophageal pacing. Temporary and permanent pacing have been used safely during pregnancy, as has direct current cardioversion. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is complicated by concerns for the fetus, which may be viable at 25 weeks. Diagnosis of the cause of tachyarrhythmias may be enhanced by roving chest leads or esophageal recording. Both supraventricular and ventricular tachycardias may become manifest during pregnancy, and conservative management is desirable if the symptoms are mild. Supraventricular tachycardias respond acutely to adenosine. Ventricular arrhythmias during pregnancy often occur in the absence of structural heart disease and are responsive to drug therapy. The safe use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator has been described.

Arrhythmias are the most common cardiovascular complication of pregnancy in women with and without structural heart disease. Appropriate maternal diagnosis and management is of utmost importance to optimize maternal and fetal outcomes. A multidisciplinary care approach with cardiology, maternal fetal medicine, anesthesia, and pediatrics is important for preconceptional, pregnancy, and delivery planning.

Congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a disorder of myocardial repolarization and is characterized by a prolonged QT interval on an electrocardiogram. A prolonged QT predisposes patients to an increased risk of syncope and sudden cardiac death secondary to polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Several mutations linked to the LQTS have been identified, the most common of which have been found in the potassium channel KCNQ1 (LQT1) and hERG (LQT2) genes and in the sodium channel SCN5A (LQT3) gene. Female sex is an independent risk factor for the development of torsades de pointes in LQTS. Furthermore, although pregnancy may be associated with protection against cardiac events in LQTS, the 9-month postpartum period represents a time of increased arrhythmogenicity. Interestingly, these cardiac events during the postpartum period are more common in patients with LQT2. The precise mechanisms that influence the cardiac repolarization during the postpartum period are unclear. Beta-blockers are considered reasonably safe during pregnancy and should be continued or initiated in patients with LQTS to reduce the risk of cardiac events. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators are safe in pregnancy, and there is no evidence that pregnant women with these devices are at any greater risk for adverse complications solely on the grounds of having the device.

INTRODUCTION:The presentation and optimal management of maternal focal atrial tachycardia (AT) during pregnancy are unknown. The objective of this study is to conduct a comprehensive summary of the existing evidence. METHODS AND RESULTS:A systematic review of all reported cases of maternal focal AT during pregnancy was performed. The primary search queried PubMed using the MeSH terms "supraventricular tachycardia" and "pregnancy." A stepwise ancillary search included article bibliographies, citations listed by the Google internet search engine, and PubMed using the MeSH terms "atrial tachycardia" and "pregnancy." In total, 28 citations that described 32 patients were retrieved. A case from our institution was added. Detailed information was available for 30 patients. Clinical characteristics at presentation included a mean ± standard deviation of 28.3 ± 5.7 years for maternal age and 24.6 ± 7.7 weeks for gestation age. Suspected tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy was present in 20 of 30 (67%) patients and left ventricular ejection fraction improved in 15 of 15 (100%) patients with follow-up measurements. Medication failure was common. Focal AT resolved spontaneously after delivery in eight of nine (89%) patients treated with only medications. Automaticity was suggested by discrete electrograms at sites of origin and lack of reported inducibility and termination with programmed stimulation in all patients who underwent electrophysiology studies. There were nine cases of successful catheter ablation with zero fluoroscopy since 2010. CONCLUSIONS:Automaticity is the dominant mechanism for patients with maternal focal AT during pregnancy. Catheter ablation with zero fluoroscopy is an emerging therapy for medically refractory cases.

Cardiac arrhythmias are responsible for a significant portion of cardiovascular disease among pregnant people. As the incidence of arrhythmias in pregnancy continues to increase, anesthesiologists who care for obstetric patients should be experts managing arrhythmias in pregnancy. This article examines the most common arrhythmias encountered in pregnancy, including risk factors, diagnosis, and management strategies. Peripartum monitoring and labor analgesia recommendations are discussed. Additionally, management of cardioversion, management of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and advanced cardiac life support in the setting of pregnancy is reviewed.

PURPOSE:Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia worldwide, and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. However, the incidence and maternal/fetal outcomes of AF in pregnancy remain unclear. This study's aims were to investigate the pooled incidence of AF in pregnant women and to assess maternal/fetal outcomes of AF in pregnancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS:A literature search for studies that reported incidence of AF in pregnancy, was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Database from inception through May 2018. Pooled incidence with 95%CI were calculated using a random-effect model. The protocol for this meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; no. CRD42018095955). RESULTS:We identified 7 cohort studies including 301,638 pregnancies. The pooled estimated incidence of AF in pregnancy among women with no known heart disease, and those with structural heart disease was 0.3% (95%CI: 0.01%-40.6%) and 2.2% (95%CI: 0.96%-5.01%), respectively. Among women with known AF, the pooled estimated incidence of recurrent AF in pregnancy was 39.2% (95%CI: 16.9%-67.2%). The pooled estimated incidence of pre-eclampsia and congestive heart failure among pregnant patients with AF was 4.1% (95%CI: 2.1%-7.8%) and 9.6% (95%CI: 5.7%-15.9%), respectively. The pooled estimated incidence of fetal events including premature birth, small for gestational age, respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage, death was 26.6% (95%CI: 20.4%-34.0%). CONCLUSION:The overall estimated incidence of AF and recurrent AF during pregnancy is as high as 2.2% and 39.2%, respectively. AF during pregnancy may result in poor maternal and fetal outcomes.

The growing population of women with heart disease of reproductive age has been associated with an increasing number of high-risk pregnancies. Pregnant women with heart disease are a very heterogeneous population, with different risks for maternal cardiovascular, obstetric, and foetal complications. Adverse cardiovascular events during pregnancy pose significant clinical challenges, with uncertainties regarding diagnostic and therapeutic approaches potentially compromising maternal and foetal health. This review summarizes best practice for the treatment of common cardiovascular complications during pregnancy, based on expert opinion, current guidelines, and available evidence. Topics covered include heart failure (HF), arrhythmias, coronary artery disease, aortic and thromboembolic events, and the management of mechanical heart valves during pregnancy. Cardiovascular pathology is the leading cause of non-obstetric morbidity and mortality during pregnancy in developed countries. For women with pre-existing cardiac conditions, preconception counselling and structured follow-up during pregnancy are important measures for reducing the risk of acute cardiovascular complications during gestation and at the time of delivery. However, many women do not receive pre-pregnancy counselling often due to gaps in what should be lifelong care, and physicians are increasingly encountering pregnant women who present acutely with cardiac complications, including HF, arrhythmias, aortic events, coronary syndromes, and bleeding or thrombotic events. This review provides a summary of recommendations on the management of acute cardiovascular complication during pregnancy, based on available literature and expert opinion. This article covers the diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapy and is organized according to the clinical presentation and the type of complication, providing a reference for the practicing cardiologist, obstetrician, and acute medicine specialist, while highlighting areas of need and potential future research.

OBJECTIVE:The effect of gestational age and other factors that could influence the outcome of an electric shock in pregnancy have not been defined yet. Objective of this study is to provide reliable data on medical issues linked to electric shock in pregnancy. METHODS:Authors consulted the most important scientific databases investigating reactions to electric shock in pregnancy, analyzing mechanism of electric shock, gestational age at the time of injury, the post-shock complications, interval from injury to delivery and fetal and maternal outcome. RESULTS:The spectrum of electrical injuries in pregnancy ranges from transient unpleasant sensation with no effect on the fetus to sudden maternal and fetal death. The clinical presentation of the fetal injury may manifest immediately or even postnataly. Reported outcomes include spontaneous abortion, placental abruption, cardiac arrhythmias, fetal burn and intrauterine fetal death. If the pregnancy is continued, decreased fetal movements and asphyxia, pathological fetal heart patterns, intrauterine fetal growth retardation, damage to the fetal central nervous system and oligoamnios can occur. CONCLUSIONS:More large prospective observational studies are necessary for a proper insight into the expected outcomes of the electric shock in pregnancy as well as for a final definition of monitoring procedures of such pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE:To review treatment options and updates that exist for the management of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT). DATA SOURCES:A literature search of PubMed was performed including articles from 1974 to June 2023 using the terms: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Primary literature and guidelines were reviewed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION:Studies were considered if they were available in English and conducted in humans. DATA SYNTHESIS:PSVT is a subset of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) that presents as a rapid, regular tachycardia with an abrupt onset and termination. Due to frequent emergency department (ED) visits annually with symptoms of PSVT, appropriate and efficient management of these patients is vital. This review provides an overview of the pathophysiology of PSVT, while also describing the literature behind nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic management of PSVT. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE:This review describes new literature regarding the improved success of the modified Valsalva maneuver as a nonpharmacologic therapy in PSVT. In addition, it describes a new technique in administration of adenosine that has improved outcomes, defines dose adjustments needed for drug interactions with adenosine, compares the utilization of nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers with adenosine, and provides management recommendations for patients in special populations. CONCLUSIONS:With high annual rates of ED visits for SVT, providers should be aware of the data behind management and modifications of therapy based on patient-specific factors (ie, patient preference, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, drug interactions, and special populations).

Cardiovascular disease significantly jeopardizes pregnancies in the United States, impacting 1% to 4% of pregnancies annually. Among complications, cardiac arrhythmias are prevalent, posing concerns for maternal and fetal health. The incidence of arrhythmias during pregnancy is rising, partly due to advances in congenital heart surgery and a growing population of women with structural heart disease. While most arrhythmias are benign, the increasing prevalence of more serious arrhythmias warrants a proactive approach. Guidance and reassurance suffice in many cases, but persistent symptoms require cautious use of antiarrhythmic drugs or other therapies for a safe outcome. Managing more serious arrhythmias requires a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach involving specialists, including maternal-fetal medicine physicians, cardiologists, electrophysiologists, and anesthesiologists.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW:To discuss the diagnosis and management of maternal arrhythmias occurring during pregnancy. RECENT FINDINGS:When necessary, current technology allows implantation of arrhythmia management devices and performing catheter ablation procedures with little or no risk from radiation exposure to the fetus. SUMMARY:A variety of cardiac rhythm disturbances can occur during pregnancy, ranging from benign ectopy to life-threatening arrhythmias. In patients with normal hearts and minimally symptomatic arrhythmias, only reassurance is necessary. The quality of the data on managing more serious arrhythmias in pregnancy is somewhat limited, yet with a clear understanding of the maternal hemodynamic changes associated with pregnancy, and the appropriate antiarrhythmic therapies available, almost all cases can be treated successfully. The decision to treat should be based on careful consideration of risk and benefits, yet, when therapy is deemed necessary, it should be administered promptly and with confidence. Drug therapy should be avoided during the first trimester if possible and drugs with the longest record of safety are preferred. The decision to pursue an invasive strategy is complicated by the potential for procedural risks. Yet, the state of modern technology is such that invasive strategies, when justified, can be carried out effectively.

Cardiac arrhythmia as a complication of pregnancy can be problematic to maternal health and fetal life and development. Catheter ablation of tachyarrhythmias during pregnancy has been successfully performed in selected patients with limited experience. Techniques to limit maternal and fetal radiation exposure, including intracardiac echo and electroanatomic mapping systems, are particularly important in this setting. Specific accommodations are necessary in the care of the gravid patient during catheter ablation.

Cardiovascular disease complicates 1-4% of pregnancies - with a higher prevalence when including hypertensive disorders - and is the leading cause of maternal death. In women with known cardiovascular pathology, such as congenital heart disease, timely counselling is possible and the outcome is fairly good. By contrast, maternal mortality is high in women with acquired heart disease that presents during pregnancy (such as acute coronary syndrome or aortic dissection). Worryingly, the prevalence of acquired cardiovascular disease during pregnancy is rising as older maternal age, obesity, diabetes mellitus and hypertension become more common in the pregnant population. Management of cardiovascular disease in pregnancy is challenging owing to the unique maternal physiology, characterized by profound changes to multiple organ systems. The presence of the fetus compounds the situation because both the cardiometabolic disease and its management might adversely affect the fetus. Equally, avoiding essential treatment because of potential fetal harm risks a poor outcome for both mother and child. In this Review, we examine how the physiological adaptations during pregnancy can provoke cardiometabolic complications or exacerbate existing cardiometabolic disease and, conversely, how cardiometabolic disease can compromise the adaptations to pregnancy and their intended purpose: the development and growth of the fetus.

Increasing maternal mortality and incidence of arrhythmias in pregnancy have been noted over the past 2 decades in the United States. Pregnancy is associated with a greater risk of arrhythmias, and patients with a history of arrhythmias are at significant risk of arrhythmia recurrence during pregnancy. The incidence of atrial fibrillation in pregnancy is rising. This review discusses the management of tachyarrhythmias and bradyarrhythmias in pregnancy, including management of cardiac arrest. Management of fetal arrhythmias are also reviewed. For patients without structural heart disease, β-blocker therapy, especially propranolol and metoprolol, and antiarrhythmic drugs, such as flecainide and sotalol, can be safely used to treat tachyarrhythmias. As a last resort, catheter ablation with minimal fluoroscopy can be performed. Device implantation can be safely performed with minimal fluoroscopy and under echocardiographic or ultrasound guidance in patients with clear indications for devices during pregnancy. Because of rising maternal mortality in the United States, which is partly driven by increasing maternal age and comorbidities, a multidisciplinary and/or integrative approach to arrhythmia management from the prepartum to the postpartum period is needed.

The physiological changes during pregnancy predispose a woman for the development of new-onset or recurrent arrhythmia. Supraventricular arrhythmia is the most common form of arrhythmia during pregnancy and, although often benign in nature, can be concerning. We describe three complex cases of supraventricular arrhythmia during pregnancy and review the currently available literature on the subject. In pregnancies complicated by arrhythmia, a plan for follow-up and both maternal and fetal monitoring during pregnancy, delivery and post partum should be made in a multidisciplinary team. Diagnostic modalities should be used as in non-pregnant women if there is an indication. All antiarrhythmic drugs cross the placenta, but when necessary, medical treatment should be used with consideration to the fetus and the mother's altered pharmacodynamics and kinetics. Electrical cardioversion is safe during pregnancy, and electrophysiological study and catheter ablation can be performed in selected patients, preferably with zero-fluoroscopy technique. Sometimes, delivering the fetus (if viable) is the best therapeutic option. In this review, we provide a framework for the workup and clinical management of supraventricular arrhythmias in pregnant women, including cardiac, obstetric and neonatal perspectives.

Peripartum cardiomyopathy is a form of systolic heart failure affecting young women toward the end of pregnancy or in the months following delivery. Incidence is higher in African-American women and in women with older maternal age, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and multiple gestation pregnancies. Symptoms of heart failure mimic those of normal pregnancy, often resulting in a delay in diagnosis and preventable complications. Echocardiography showing decreased myocardial function is essential for the diagnosis. Medical management is similar to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction of other etiologies, but adjustments during pregnancy are necessary to ensure fetal safety. Variable outcomes include complete recovery, persistent heart failure, arrhythmias, thromboembolic events, and death. Subsequent pregnancy confers substantial risk of relapse and even death if there is incomplete myocardial recovery. Additional research about the etiology, optimal therapy including the use of bromocriptine, long-term outcomes, and duration of treatment after recovery are needed.

Aim This executive summary of the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy clinical practice guideline provides recommendations and algorithms for clinicians to diagnose and manage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in adult and pediatric patients as well as supporting documentation to encourage their use. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 1, 2010, to April 30, 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reports, and other relevant databases. Structure Many recommendations from the earlier hypertrophic cardiomyopathy guidelines have been updated with new evidence or a better understanding of earlier evidence. This summary operationalizes the recommendations from the full guideline and presents a combination of diagnostic work-up, genetic and family screening, risk stratification approaches, lifestyle modifications, surgical and catheter interventions, and medications that constitute components of guideline directed medical therapy. For both guideline-directed medical therapy and other recommended drug treatment regimens, the reader is advised to follow dosing, contraindications and drug-drug interactions based on product insert materials.

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a rare but potentially fatal complication in pregnancy. We present a case of a pregnant woman with cardiomyopathy due to frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) and VT originating from the left ventricular outflow tract. After presenting late in the third trimester, the decision was made to deliver the fetus after 4 days of medication titration due to continued sustained episodes of VT. After delivery, the patient continued to have frequent PVCs and VT several months after discharge, and she ultimately underwent a PVC ablation with dramatic reduction in PVC burden and improvement in cardiomyopathy. Multidisciplinary planning with a pregnancy heart team led to appropriate contingency planning and a successful delivery. This case highlights how multidisciplinary management is best practice in pregnancy complicated by VT and the need for better diagnostic guidelines for PVC-induced cardiomyopathy in the setting of pregnancy.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) can result in significant maternal morbidity and even mortality. Available data suggest that many antihypertensives can be safely used in pregnant patients, albeit with close supervision of parameters like fetal growth and amniotic fluid volume. This article summarizes current guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in pregnancy and provides an in-depth guide to the available safety and efficacy data for antihypertensives during pregnancy and postpartum.

Although ischaemic heart disease is currently rarely encountered in pregnancy, occurring between 2.8 and 6.2 per 100 000 deliveries, it is becoming more common as women delay becoming pregnant until later life, when medical comorbidities are more common, and because of the higher prevalence of obesity in the pregnant population. In addition, chronic inflammatory diseases, which are more common in women, may contribute to greater rates of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Pregnancy itself seems to be a risk factor for AMI, although the exact mechanisms are not clear. AMI in pregnancy should be investigated in the same manner as in the non-pregnant population, not allowing for delays, with investigations being conducted as they would outside of pregnancy. Maternal morbidity following AMI is high as a result of increased rates of heart failure, arrhythmia and cardiogenic shock. Delivery in women with history of AMI should be typically guided by obstetric indications not cardiac ones.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality for women globally. Sex differences exist in the relative risks conferred by traditional CVD risk factors, including diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and smoking. Additionally, there are female-specific risk factors, including age of menarche and menopause, polycystic ovary syndrome, infertility and the use of assisted reproductive technology, spontaneous pregnancy loss, parity, and adverse pregnancy outcomes, as well as female-predominant conditions such as autoimmune diseases, migraines, and depression, that enhance women's cardiovascular risk across the lifespan. Along with measurement of traditional risk factors, these female-specific factors should also be ascertained as a part of cardiovascular risk assessment to allow for a more comprehensive overview of the risk for developing cardiometabolic disorders and CVD. When present, these factors can identify women at elevated cardiovascular risk, who may benefit from more intensive preventive interventions, including lifestyle changes and/or pharmacotherapy such as statins. This review describes sex differences in traditional risk factors and female-specific/female-predominant risk factors for CVD and examines the role of coronary artery calcium scores and certain biomarkers that can help further risk stratify patients and guide preventive recommendations.

AIM:The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes). METHODS:A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate. Structure: Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.