Direction discrimination thresholds in binocular, monocular, and dichoptic viewing: Motion opponency and contrast gain control.
Maehara Goro,Hess Robert F,Georgeson Mark A
Journal of vision
We studied the binocular organization of motion opponency and its relationship to contrast gain control. Luminance contrast thresholds for discriminating direction of motion were measured for drifting Gabor patterns (target) presented on counterphase flickering Gabor patterns (pedestal). There were four presentation conditions: binocular, monocular, dichoptic, and half-binocular. For the half-binocular presentation, the target was presented to one eye while pedestals were presented to both eyes. In addition, to test for motion opponency, we studied two increment and decrement conditions, in which the target increased contrast for one direction of movement but decreased it for the opposite moving component of the pedestal. Threshold versus pedestal contrast functions showed a dipper shape, and there was a strong interaction between pedestal contrast and test condition. Binocular thresholds were lower than monocular thresholds but only at low pedestal contrasts. Monocular and half-binocular thresholds were similar at low pedestal contrasts, but half-binocular thresholds became higher and closer to dichoptic thresholds as pedestal contrast increased. Adding the decremental target reduced thresholds by a factor of two or more-a strong sign of opponency-when the decrement was in the same eye as the increment or the opposite eye. We compared several computational models fitted to the data. Converging evidence from the present and previous studies (Gorea, Conway, & Blake, 2001) suggests that motion opponency is most likely to be monocular, occurring before direction-specific binocular summation and before divisive, binocular gain control.
10.1167/17.1.7
Binocular summation is affected by crowding and tagging.
Siman-Tov Ziv,Lev Maria,Polat Uri
Scientific reports
In perceptual crowding, a letter easily recognized on its own, becomes unrecognizable if it is surrounded by other letters, an effect that confers a limit on the visual processing. Models assume that crowding is a hallmark of the periphery but that it is almost absent in the fovea. However, recently it was shown that crowding occurs in the fovea of people with an abnormal development of functional vision (amblyopia), when the stimulus is presented for a very short time. When targets and flankers are dissimilar, the crowding is reduced (tagging). Since a combination of binocular inputs increases the processing load, we investigated whether color tagging the target reduces crowding in the fovea of subjects with normal vision and determined how crowding is combined with binocular vision. The crowding effect at the fovea was significantly reduced by tagging with a color target. Interestingly, whereas binocular summation for a single letter was expected to be about 40%, it was significantly reduced and almost absent under crowding conditions. Our results are consistent with the notion that the crowding effect produces a high processing load on visual processing, which interferes with other processes such as binocular summation. We assume that the tagging effect in our experiment improved the subject's abilities (sensitivity and RT) by creating a "segmentation", i.e., a visual simulated separation between the target letter and the background. Interestingly, tagging the target with a distinct color can eliminate or reduce the crowding effect and consequently, binocular summation recovers.
10.1038/s41598-021-83510-8
Binocular summation in high and low contrast letter acuities.
Frontiers in neuroscience
Binocular summation, a well-known phenomenon in letter acuity measurement, refers to the improvement in visual performance when viewing with both eyes compared to one eye alone. The present study aims to assess the relationship in binocular summation between high and low contrast letter acuities, and examine whether baseline measure (binocular summation at either high or low contrast) is predictive of the change in binocular summation between contrast conditions. Corrected high and low contrast letter acuities were assessed monocularly and binocularly in 358 normal vision observers aged 18-37 years using Bailey-Lovie charts. All observers had high contrast acuities (both monocular and binocular) of 0.1 LogMAR or better and no known eye disease. Binocular summation was calculated as the difference in LogMAR between the better eye acuity and binocular acuity. We found that binocular summation was present at both contrast levels (0.044 ± 0.002 LogMAR for high and 0.069 ± 0.002 LogMAR for low contrast) with higher magnitude of summation at low contrast, and declined with increasing interocular difference. There was a correlation in binocular summation between high and low contrast. The difference in binocular summation between the two contrast levels was found to be correlated with the baseline measurement. Using common commercially available letter acuity charts, we replicated the findings on binocular acuity summation in normally sighted young adults for both high and low contrast letters. Our study revealed a positive relationship in binocular acuity summation between high and low contrast, and an association between a baseline measure and the change in binocular summation between contrast levels. These findings may serve as a reference in clinical practice and research when high and low contrast binocular summations are measured in assessing binocular functional vision.
10.3389/fnins.2023.1174900
Interocular Phase Disparity Tuning of Binocular Contrast Summation Depends on Carrier Spatial Frequency and Orientation.
Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry
SIGNIFICANCE:Binocular summation is a sensitive metric of binocular integration. As such, characterization of the mechanisms underlying binocular summation is a key step in translating and applying this knowledge to abnormal binocular systems afflicted with strabismus and amblyopia. PURPOSE:Computational models of binocular summation have advocated the operation of mechanisms sensitive to the interocular phase disparity of first-order carrier gratings. This study investigated if such generalization depended on carrier spatial frequency and orientation. METHODS:Monocular and binocular contrast detection thresholds were measured in nine observers with normal binocular vision. Stimuli comprised Gabor targets presented with one of three spatial frequencies (1, 3, and 9 cycles per degree [cpd]), two orientations (horizontal and vertical), and five interocular phase disparities (0, ± π /2, ± π radians). Horizontal and vertical fixation disparities were measured for each binocular threshold condition. Binocular summation ratios were computed by dividing the mean monocular detection threshold by the respective binocular detection threshold. RESULTS:Binocular summation ratio varied significantly with interocular phase disparity for the 1- and 3-cpd horizontal and vertical gratings. Phase dependency was reduced with the 9-cpd horizontal grating and absent for the 9-cpd vertical grating, even though binocular summation ratio exceeded predictions of probability summation. Computational modeling that incorporated the variability of fixation disparity into a vector summation model predicted a reduction in peak binocular summation ratio with increasing carrier spatial frequency but did not account for the reduction of phase sensitivity noted with the 9-cpd stimulus. CONCLUSIONS:Binocular summation magnitude is less dependent on interocular phase disparities for carrier spatial frequencies that exceed 3 cpd, especially with vertical gratings. Although vergence variability due to fixation disparities contributes to the overall reduction in binocular summation magnitude with increasing carrier spatial frequency, it does not provide a complete account for the lack of interocular phase disparity tuning noted with high grating spatial frequencies.
10.1097/OPX.0000000000001907
A Unified Rule for Binocular Contrast Summation Applies to Normal Vision and Common Eye Diseases.
Investigative ophthalmology & visual science
Purpose:Binocular summation refers to better visual performance with two eyes than with one eye. Little is known about the mechanism underlying binocular contrast summation in patients with common eye diseases who often exhibit binocularly asymmetric vision loss and structural changes along the visual pathway. Here we asked whether the mechanism of binocular contrast summation remains preserved in eye disease. Methods:This study included 1035 subjects with normal ocular health, cataract, age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma, and retinitis pigmentosa. Monocular and binocular contrast sensitivity were measured by the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart. Interocular ratio (IOR) was quantified as the ratio between the poorer and better eye contrast sensitivity. Binocular summation ratio (BSR) was quantified as the ratio between binocular and better eye contrast sensitivity. Results:All groups showed statistically significant binocular summation, with the BSR ranging from 1.25 [1.20, 1.30] in the glaucoma group to 1.31 [1.27, 1.36] in the normal vision group. There was no significant group difference in the BSR, after accounting for IOR. By fitting a binocular summation model Binocular = (Leftm + Rightm)1/m to the contrast sensitivity data, we found that the same binocular summation rule, reflected by the parameter m, applies across the five groups. Conclusions:Cortical binocular contrast summation appears to be preserved in spite of eye diseases that can affect the two eyes differently. This finding supports the importance of assessing both monocular and binocular functions, rather than relying on a monocular assessment in the better eye as a potentially inaccurate surrogate measure.
10.1167/iovs.62.13.6
Binocular vision.
Blake Randolph,Wilson Hugh
Vision research
This essay reviews major developments - empirical and theoretical - in the field of binocular vision during the last 25years. We limit our survey primarily to work on human stereopsis, binocular rivalry and binocular contrast summation, with discussion where relevant of single-unit neurophysiology and human brain imaging. We identify several key controversies that have stimulated important work on these problems. In the case of stereopsis those controversies include position vs. phase encoding of disparity, dependence of disparity limits on spatial scale, role of occlusion in binocular depth and surface perception, and motion in 3D. In the case of binocular rivalry, controversies include eye vs. stimulus rivalry, role of "top-down" influences on rivalry dynamics, and the interaction of binocular rivalry and stereopsis. Concerning binocular contrast summation, the essay focuses on two representative models that highlight the evolving complexity in this field of study.
10.1016/j.visres.2010.10.009
Binocular Summation Is Intact in Intermittent Exotropia After Surgery.
Xu Meiping,Chen Yiya,Peng Yiyi,He Zhifen,Jiang Jun,Yu Xinping,Hou Fang,Zhou Jiawei,Qu Jia
Frontiers in medicine
To determine binocular summation of surgically treated intermittent exotropia (IXT) patients by measuring the contrast threshold. We recruited 38 surgically treated IXT patients aged 8-24 years and 20 age-matched healthy controls. All participants had normal or corrected-to-normal visual acuity (Snellen ≥ 20/20) in both eyes. The IXT patients had undergone the surgery at least a year prior to the study. Twenty-one of them obtained good alignment and 17 experienced a recurrence of exotropia. We measured the observers' monocular and binocular contrast sensitivities (CS) at six spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 cycles/degree) as an index of visual information processing at the threshold level. Binocular summation was evaluated against a baseline model of simple probability summation based on the CS at each spatial frequency and the area under the log contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF). The exo-deviation of IXTs with good alignment was -6.38 ± 3.61 prism diopters (pd) at 33 cm and -5.14 ± 4.07 pd at 5 m. For the patients with recurrence, it was -23.47 ± 5.53 pd and -21.12 ± 4.28 pd, respectively. There was no significant difference in the binocular summation ratio (BSR) between the surgically treated IXT patients, including those with good alignment and recurrence, and normal controls at each spatial frequency [ = 0.416, = 0.662] and AULCSF [ = 0.469, = 0.628]. In addition, the BSR was not associated with stereopsis ( = -0.151, = 0.365). Our findings of normal contrast sensitivity binocular summation ratio in IXT after surgical treatment suggest that the ability of the visual cortex in processing binocular information is intact at the contrast threshold level.
10.3389/fmed.2021.791548