Combination nivolumab and ipilimumab or nivolumab alone in melanoma brain metastases: a multicentre randomised phase 2 study. Long Georgina V,Atkinson Victoria,Lo Serigne,Sandhu Shahneen,Guminski Alexander D,Brown Michael P,Wilmott James S,Edwards Jarem,Gonzalez Maria,Scolyer Richard A,Menzies Alexander M,McArthur Grant A The Lancet. Oncology BACKGROUND:Nivolumab monotherapy and combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab increase proportions of patients achieving a response and survival versus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma; however, efficacy in active brain metastases is unknown. We aimed to establish the efficacy and safety of nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab in patients with active melanoma brain metastases. METHODS:This multicentre open-label randomised phase 2 trial was done at four sites in Australia, in three cohorts of immunotherapy-naive patients aged 18 years or older with melanoma brain metastases. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases with no previous local brain therapy were randomly assigned using the biased coin minimisation method, stratified by site, in a 30:24 ratio (after a safety run-in of six patients) to cohort A (nivolumab plus ipilimumab) or cohort B (nivolumab). Patients with brain metastases in whom local therapy had failed, or who had neurological symptoms, or leptomeningeal disease were enrolled in non-randomised cohort C (nivolumab). Patients in cohort A received intravenous nivolumab 1 mg/kg combined with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses, then nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks; patients in cohort B or cohort C received intravenous nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was intracranial response from week 12. Primary and safety analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02374242, and is ongoing for the final survival analysis. FINDINGS:Between Nov 4, 2014, and April 21, 2017, 79 patients were enrolled; 36 in cohort A, 27 in cohort B, and 16 in cohort C. One patient in cohort A and two in cohort B were found to be ineligible and excluded from the study before receiving the study drug. At the data cutoff (Aug 28, 2017), with a median follow up of 17 months (IQR 8-25), intracranial responses were achieved by 16 (46%; 95% CI 29-63) of 35 patients in cohort A, five (20%; 7-41) of 25 in cohort B, and one (6%; 0-30) of 16 in cohort C. Intracranial complete responses occurred in six (17%) patients in cohort A, three (12%) in cohort B, and none in cohort C. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 34 (97%) of 35 patients in cohort A, 17 (68%) of 25 in cohort B, and eight (50%) of 16 in cohort C. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19 (54%) patients in cohort A, four (16%) in cohort B, and two (13%) in cohort C. No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION:Nivolumab combined with ipilimumab and nivolumab monotherapy are active in melanoma brain metastases. A high proportion of patients achieved an intracranial response with the combination. Thus, nivolumab combined with ipilimumab should be considered as a first-line therapy for patients with asymptomatic untreated brain metastases. FUNDING:Melanoma Institute Australia and Bristol-Myers Squibb. 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30139-6

Amelanotic metastatic gastric malignant melanoma: a case report. Anti-cancer drugs Melanoma is a malignant form of cutaneous cancer with an increasing incidence since 1970s, accounting for nearly 75% of the death related to skin cancer especially in western countries. Highest recurrence and mortality were observed for the subtype with distal metastasis, demonstrating poor outcomes. However, high incidence of gastrointestinal metastasis of malignant melanoma is frequently misdiagnosed due to lack of specific clinical manifestations, especially for the rare observed cases presented amelanotic appearance, accounting for about 2% of all metastatic cases. In the present study, we reported a 36-year-old male patient, who was firstly diagnosed as gastric cancer, and then was confirmed as amelanotic melanoma metastasis by pathological examination, demonstrating positive for melanoma markers including Melan A, S-100, Hmb45 and CD79a. In conclusion, for the amelanotic neoplasm observed during gastroscopy in patients with melanoma history, pathological examination should be carried out to confirm the possibility of melanoma metastasis, providing evidences for the following treatment. 10.1097/CAD.0000000000001227