Occurrence rate and risk factors for long-term central line-associated bloodstream infections in patients with cancer: A systematic review.
Worldviews on evidence-based nursing
INTRODUCTION:Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is a public health problem that harms patients' outcomes and healthcare costs, especially in susceptible populations such as patients with cancer. Overall, systematic queries about etiology, risks, and epidemiology are explained by data from observational studies, which better underline the relationship between factors and incidence of disease. However, no recent systematic reviews of observational studies on adult patients with cancer have been conducted on this topic, considering the wide range of all potential factors which can contribute to the increase in infection rate in the hospitalized adults with cancer. This study systematically reviewed observational studies investigating the occurrence rate of CLABSI and its risk factors for long-term inserted central catheter-related infections in hospitalized adult cancer patients. METHODS:A systematic review was performed on four databases from the earliest available date until December 2020. Retrospective and prospective cohort studies focused on the occurrence rate of CLABSI and its risk factors in hospitalized adult cancer patients. The pooled occurrence rate of CLABSI (95% CI) was calculated by applying a random-effects model. RESULTS:Of 1712 studies, 8 were eligible, and the data of device-related infection rate were meta-analyzed. The pooled occurrence rate of CLABSI was roughly 8% (95% CI [4%, 14%]). The device characteristics, device's management aspects, therapies administration, and select patients' clinical conditions represent the main risk factors for long-term catheter-related infection in cancer patients. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION:Considering the substantial infection rate among cancer patients, identifying risk rate factors is pivotal to support evidence-grounded preventive strategies and maximize cancer patient safety. This study's results could guide policymakers and healthcare leaders and future research studies to disseminate appropriate risk-reducing management culture and implement standardized research and clinical approach to the investigated phenomenon as an infection surveillance strategy.
10.1111/wvn.12574
Analysis of risk factors for nosocomial sepsis in surgical patients.
Fariñas-Alvarez C,Fariñas M C,Fernández-Mazarrasa C,Llorca J,Casanova D,Delgado-Rodríguez M
The British journal of surgery
BACKGROUND:This study aimed to identify patients at high risk for developing sepsis following surgery according to criteria determined by the American College of Chest Physicians and the Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference on sepsis. METHODS:A prospective case-control study was performed in surgical patients in a tertiary care centre over 1 year. Patients were identified by a daily prospective surveillance. Controls were selected randomly from the daily list of surgical inpatients. Data were collected prospectively. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and their 95 per cent confidence intervals were computed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS:During follow-up, 99 cases and 99 controls were identified. The main risk factors for sepsis found in the multivariate analysis were coma within 48 h before sepsis (OR 13.5, 95 per cent confidence interval 3.6-50.8), low serum albumin level at admission (OR 15.8, 5.4-46.4), two or more intrinsic co-morbidities (OR 11.8, 2.8-49.4) and parenteral nutrition (OR 5.1, 1.5-17.1). Emergency surgery (OR 3.0, 1.4-6.4), abdominal surgery (OR 2.6, 1.0-6.8) and number of surgical interventions (OR 2.5, 1. 1-6.1) were the variables related to surgery that significantly increased the risk of sepsis. Both the study on the Efficacy of Nosocomial Infection Control (SENIC) and the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance indices showed a statistically significant trend with sepsis. CONCLUSION:Patient-related factors appear to represent the greatest risk for developing postoperative nosocomial sepsis, rather than factors associated with the surgery.
10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01466.x
Risk factors of sepsis following pancreaticoduodenectomy based on inflammation markers and clinical characteristics.
Zhang Haoyun,Meng Fanyu,Lu Shichun
ANZ journal of surgery
BACKGROUND:Sepsis is a common complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors of sepsis based on serum inflammatory markers and clinical characteristics in patients who underwent PD. METHODS:A total of 138 patients were enrolled in this study and all patients underwent curative PD. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for post-operative sepsis. The patients' basic clinical features and inflammatory biomarkers including cytokines (IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and tumour necrosis factor-α), procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and peripheral neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio were analysed. RESULTS:Of 138 patients, 31 developed sepsis during hospitalization. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that body mass index, blood transfusion, operative time, American Society of Anesthesiologists score and diabetes were significant predictors of sepsis among all clinical characteristic variables. IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein were significant predictors among all inflammation biomarkers. By including different variables, three different regression models were obtained. The full model including all predictors mentioned above showed a C-index of 0.831 and blood transfusion showed no statistically significance in this model. The reduced model 1 including blood transfusion showed a C-index of 0.809. Another reduced model which included pre-operative and intra-operative variables showed a C-index of 0.814 and this model could be used for early sepsis risk estimation. CONCLUSION:Pre-operative IL-6 was an independent risk factor for sepsis following PD. The three different predictive models could help early sepsis estimation for patients underwent PD.
10.1111/ans.15791
Incidence, Risk Factors and Outcomes of Sepsis in Critically Ill Post-craniotomy Patients: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study.
Frontiers in public health
Background:Data concerning the epidemiology of sepsis in critically ill post-craniotomy patients are scarce. This study aimed to assess the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of sepsis in this population. Methods:This was a single-center prospective cohort study. Post-craniotomy patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were screened daily for the presence of infection and sepsis. Results:Of the 900 included patients, 300 developed sepsis. The cumulative incidence of sepsis was 33.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 30.2-36.4%]. Advanced age, male, hypertension, trauma, postoperative intracranial complications, and lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on the first postoperative day were independent risk factors of sepsis. Septic patients had higher hospital mortality (13.7 vs. 8.3%, = 0.012), longer ICU length of stay (LOS) (14 vs. 4 days, < 0.001), longer hospital LOS (31 vs. 19 days, < 0.001), and higher total medical cost (CNY 138,394 vs. 75,918, < 0.001) than patients without sepsis. Conclusion:Sepsis is a frequent complication in critically ill post-craniotomy patients. Advanced age, male, hypertension, trauma, postoperative intracranial complications, and lower GCS on the first postoperative day were independent risk factors of sepsis.
10.3389/fpubh.2022.895991
Sepsis and survival in critically ill calves: Risk factors and antimicrobial use.
Journal of veterinary internal medicine
BACKGROUND:Sepsis is a life-threatening disease for which critically important antimicrobials (CIA) frequently are used. Diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for sepsis and critically ill calves are largely lacking. OBJECTIVES:Identify factors associated with mortality in critically ill calves and describe bacteria obtained from blood cultures of critically ill calves with sepsis and their antimicrobial resistance. ANIMALS:Two-hundred thirty critically ill calves, mainly Belgian Blue beef cattle. METHODS:Retrospective cohort study. Logistic regression, survival analysis, and decision tree analysis were used to determine factors associated with mortality. RESULTS:Of the critically ill calves, 34.3% had sepsis and 61.3% died. The final survival model indicated that calves with sepsis (hazard risk [HR]: 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-2.5; P = .05), abnormal behavior (HR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.3-4.0; P = .005), and hypothermia (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.72-0.95; P = .01) had a significantly higher mortality risk. In a second survival model, hypothermia (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78-0.96; P = .004) and hypoglycemia (HR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.5-3.3; P < .001) were risk factors for mortality. Decision tree analysis emphasized the importance of behavior, hypochloremia, hypoglycemia, hyperkalemia, and lung ultrasonography for mortality risk. Escherichia coli (30.6%) was most frequently isolated from blood cultures, of which 90.9% were multidrug resistant. Inappropriate use of antimicrobials was frequent for penicillin, amoxicillin, and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, but less for CIA. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE:Many critically ill calves have sepsis, which increases mortality risk. Bacteria involved are often resistant to first-intention antimicrobials but less resistant to CIA. The other identified risk factors for mortality can support therapeutic decision-making.
10.1111/jvim.16607
Interpretable machine-learning model for real-time, clustered risk factor analysis of sepsis and septic death in critical care.
Computer methods and programs in biomedicine
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Interpretable and real-time prediction of sepsis and risk factor analysis could enable timely treatment by clinicians and improve patient outcomes. To develop an interpretable machine-learning model for the prediction and risk factor analysis of sepsis and septic death. METHODS:This is a retrospective observational cohort study based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) dataset; 69,619 patients from the database were screened. The two outcomes include patients diagnosed with sepsis and the death of septic patients. Clinical variables from ICU admission to outcomes were analyzed: demographic data, vital signs, Glasgow Coma Scale scores, laboratory test results, and results for arterial blood gasses (ABGs). Model performance was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Model interpretations were based on the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP), and the clustered analysis was based on the combination of K-means and dimensionality reduction algorithms of t-SNE and PCA. RESULTS:For the analysis of sepsis and septic death, 47,185 and 2480 patients were enrolled, respectively. The XGBoost model achieved a predictive value of area under the curve (AUC): 0.745 [0.731-0.759] for sepsis prediction and 0.8 [0.77, 0.828] for septic death prediction. The real-time prediction model was trained to predict by day and visualize the individual or combined risk factor effects on the outcomes based on SHAP values. Clustered analysis separated the two phenotypes with distinct risk factors among patients with septic death. CONCLUSION:The proposed real-time, clustered prediction model for sepsis and septic death exhibited superior performance in predicting the outcomes and visualizing the risk factors in a real-time and interpretable manner to distinguish and mitigate patient risks, thus promising immense potential in effective clinical decision making and comprehensive understanding of complex diseases such as sepsis.
10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107772
Predicting the prognosis in patients with sepsis by a pyroptosis-related gene signature.
Frontiers in immunology
Background:Sepsis remains a life-threatening disease with a high mortality rate that causes millions of deaths worldwide every year. Many studies have suggested that pyroptosis plays an important role in the development and progression of sepsis. However, the potential prognostic and diagnostic value of pyroptosis-related genes in sepsis remains unknown. Methods:The GSE65682 and GSE95233 datasets were obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and pyroptosis-related genes were obtained from previous literature and Molecular Signature Database. Univariate cox analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) cox regression analysis were used to select prognostic differentially expressed pyroptosis-related genes and constructed a prognostic risk score. Functional analysis and immune infiltration analysis were used to investigate the biological characteristics and immune cell enrichment in sepsis patients who were classified as low- or high-risk based on their risk score. Then the correlation between pyroptosis-related genes and immune cells was analyzed and the diagnostic value of the selected genes was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results:A total of 16 pyroptosis-related differentially expressed genes were identified between sepsis patients and healthy individuals. A six-gene-based (, and ) prognostic risk score was developed. Based on the risk score, sepsis patients were divided into low- and high-risk groups, and patients in the low-risk group had a better prognosis. Functional enrichment analysis found that NOD-like receptor signaling pathway, hematopoietic cell lineage, and other immune-related pathways were enriched. Immune infiltration analysis showed that some innate and adaptive immune cells were significantly different between low- and high-risk groups, and correlation analysis revealed that all six genes were significantly correlated with neutrophils. Four out of six genes (, and also have potential diagnostic value in sepsis diagnosis. Conclusion:We developed and validated a novel prognostic predictive risk score for sepsis based on six pyroptosis-related genes. Four out of the six genes also have potential diagnostic value in sepsis diagnosis.
10.3389/fimmu.2022.1110602
Risk factors of sepsis among patients with qSOFA<2 in the emergency department.
Shibata Junichiro,Osawa Itsuki,Ito Honoka,Soeno Shoko,Hara Konan,Sonoo Tomohiro,Nakamura Kensuke,Goto Tadahiro
The American journal of emergency medicine
OBJECTIVE:Studies have suggested that qSOFA can be used for early detection of sepsis immediately upon arrival at the emergency department (ED). Despite this, little is known about the risk factors associated with the subsequent diagnosis of sepsis among patients with qSOFA<2 in the ED. METHODS:This is a retrospective cohort study using ED data from a large tertiary medical center in Japan, 2018-2020. We included adult patients (aged ≥18 years) presenting to the ED with suspected infection (e.g., having a fever) and qSOFA<2. We identified patients who developed sepsis based on the Sepsis-3 criteria, and compared patient characteristics (e.g., demographics, vital signs upon the initial triage, chief complaint, and comorbidities) between patients who developed sepsis or not. Additionally, we identified the potential risk factors of sepsis among patients with qSOFA<2 using a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS:We identified 151 (7%) patients who developed sepsis among 2025 adult patients with suspected infection and qSOFA<2. Compared with patients who did not develop sepsis, patients who developed sepsis were likely to be older and have vital signs suggestive of imminent sepsis (e.g., high respiratory rate). In the multivariable logistic regression model, the potential risk factors of sepsis among patients with qSOFA<2 were older age (adjusted OR, 1.92 [95%CI 1.19-3.19]), vital signs suggestive of imminent sepsis (e.g., adjusted OR of altered mental status, 3.50 [95%CI 2.25-5.50]), receipt of oxygen therapy upon arrival at the ED (adjusted OR, 1.91 [95%CI 1.38-2.26]), chief complaint of sore throat (adjusted OR, 2.15 [95%CI 1.08-4.13]), and the presence of comorbid diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, and chronic kidney disease (e.g., adjusted OR of diabetes mellitus, 1.47 [95%CI 1.10-1.96]). On the contrary, chief complaint of abdominal and chest pain were associated with a lower risk of sepsis (e.g., adjusted OR of abdominal pain, 0.26 [95%CI 0.14-0.45]). CONCLUSIONS:We found that older age, vital signs prognosticating sepsis, and the presence of some comorbidities were the potential risk factors of sepsis in patients with qSOFA<2. These potential risk factors could be useful to efficiently recognize patients who might develop sepsis in the ED.
10.1016/j.ajem.2021.09.035
Clinical- and surgery-specific risk factors for post-operative sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 30 million patients.
Plaeke Philip,De Man Joris G,Coenen Samuel,Jorens Philippe G,De Winter Benedicte Y,Hubens Guy
Surgery today
Post-operative sepsis is a severe complication of surgery, which often worsens the clinical outcomes. While several risk factors have been identified, the importance of others remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine patient and surgery-related risk factors for post-operative sepsis. We reviewed Medline, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane library, systematically, for articles describing risk factors for sepsis. The role of eligible risk factors was investigated using a random-effects model, while analyzing univariate and multivariate data separately. Among 193 pro- and retrospective articles, comprising over 30 million patients, 38 eligible risk factors were selected for this meta-analysis. The patient-related risk factors associated with post-operative sepsis included male gender (odds ratio, OR 1.41), pre-existing heart failure (OR 2.53), diabetes (OR 1.41), and chronic kidney disease (OR 1.26). The surgery-related risk factors identified included emergency surgery (OR 3.38), peri-operative blood transfusion (OR 1.90), inpatient hospital stay (OR 2.31), and open surgery (OR 1.80). The adjusted overall incidence of surgical sepsis was 1.84%. In conclusion, multiple-patient and surgery-related risk factors are associated with the development of post-operative sepsis. Recognizing these risk factors could assist in the pre-operative identification of patients at risk of post-operative sepsis.
10.1007/s00595-019-01827-4
[Risk factors for sepsis in patients with hepatic failure].
Qian Jing,Liu Guowang,Wang Rui,Liu Junjuan,Liu Yupei,Liang Shuren,Lu Wei
Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue
OBJECTIVE:To analyze the pathogenic characteristics of sepsis in patients with hepatic failure, and to explore the risk factors for sepsis in patients with liver failure. METHODS:The data of 221 patients with hepatic failure admitted to Tianjin Second People's Hospital from January 2014 to December 2018 were retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether they suffered from sepsis or not. The pathogeny results of blood culture in patients with sepsis were observed. The levels of white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil (Neut), platelet (PLT), lactic acid (Lac), C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) were compared between the two groups. The risk factors for sepsis in patients with hepatic failure were analyzed by multivariate Logistic regression analysis. RESULTS:Among 221 patients, 27 cases had incomplete data and were excluded. Finally, 194 cases were enrolled in the analysis, including 52 in sepsis group and 142 in non-sepsis group. From 2014 to 2018, there were 11, 12, 11, 11 and 8 positive cases of sepsis in patients with liver failure. The positive rate of Gram-positive (G) bacteria increased year by year (2, 3, 4, 5 and 4 cases of G bacteria from 2014 to 2018). There was no significant difference in demographic and medical history data, such as gender, age and history of diabetes mellitus between the two groups. Compared with non-sepsis group, Neut, Lac, CRP and PCT in sepsis group were significantly increased [Neut: 0.81±0.09 vs. 0.74±0.15, Lac (mmol/L): 3.04±0.61 vs. 2.00±0.43, CRP (mg/L): 44.09±8.37 vs. 40.54±8.37, PCT (μg/L): 0.34±0.12 vs. 0.31±0.11], with significant differences (all P < 0.05). But there was no statistical difference in WBC or PLT between the two groups. The multivariate Logistic regression model incorporated the indicators with statistical significance in univariate analysis. The results showed that Lac was an independent factor of sepsis in patients with hepatic failure [odds ratio (OR) = 58.286, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) = 16.633-204.247, P = 0.000]. CONCLUSIONS:For patients with hepatic failure infection, the ratio of G bacteria increased year by year. Elevated Lac is an independent risk factor for sepsis in patients with liver failure.
10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.07.020
[Analysis of risk factors for prolonged mechanical ventilation in patients with sepsis after abdominal surgery].
Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue
OBJECTIVE:To analyze the risk factors of prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) in patients with sepsis complicated by abdominal surgery, and to evaluate the predictive value of risk factors for PMV. METHODS:A retrospective case-control study was conducted. The clinical data of patients with postoperative abdominal sepsis complicated with invasive mechanical ventilation who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020 were collected. The patients were divided into PMV group (duration of mechanical ventilation longer than 48 hours) and non-PMV group (duration of mechanical ventilation shorter than 48 hours) according to the duration of mechanical ventilation in ICU. The patient's gender, age, body mass index (BMI), underlying diseases, mean arterial pressure (MAP), complete blood count, blood biochemistry, arterial blood gas, cardiac function indicators, procalcitonin (PCT) at admission to the ICU, the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) and the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores in the first 24 hours of admission to the ICU, and other clinical information were recorded. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression models were used to analyze the risk factors for PMV. Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was drawn to evaluate the predictive value of related indicators for PMV. RESULTS:A total of 195 patients with sepsis after abdominal surgery who received invasive mechanical ventilation were enrolled, including 127 males (65.1%) and 68 females (34.9%), with the median age of 65 (21, 93) years old. There were 91 patients (46.7%) in the non-PMV group and 104 patients (53.3%) in the PMV group. Univariate analysis showed that the APACHE II score, SOFA score, cardiac troponin T (cTnT), N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in the PMV group were significantly higher than those in the non-PMV group. Oxygenation index (PaO/FiO), total protein (TP) and prealbumin (PA) in the PMV group were all lower than those in the non-PMV group when admitted to ICU. In the PMV group, serum creatinine (SCr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), cystatin C (Cys C) were significantly increased, prothrombin time (PT) was significantly prolonged, the proportion of patients with septic shock and hypertension were significantly increased as compared with those in the non-PMV group. Multivariate analysis showed that low PaO/FiO at ICU admission [odds ratio (OR) = 0.995, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 0.992-0.999, P = 0.010], high ln PCT (OR = 1.301, 95%CI was 1.088-1.555, P = 0.004), high ln cTnT (OR = 1.562, 95%CI was 1.079-2.261, P = 0.018) and septic shock (OR = 4.967, 95%CI was 2.461-10.026, P = 0.000) were the independent risk factors for PMV in patients with sepsis after abdominal surgery. ROC curve analysis showed that the PaO/FiO, ln cTnT, ln PCT and septic shock had certain predictive value for PMV, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the four variables were 0.607, 0.638, 0.690 and 0.711, the sensitivity was 50.0%, 62.5%, 86.5% and 74.0%, and the specificity was 71.4%, 62.6%, 48.3% and 68.1%, respectively. The AUC for the joint prediction of the four variables was 0.803, with a sensitivity of 76.0% and a specificity of 78.0%. It suggested that the multivariate joint prediction of PMV was more accurate. CONCLUSIONS:Decreased PaO/FiO, increased PCT, increased cTnT and the occurrence of septic shock are independent risk factors for PMV in patients with sepsis complicated by abdominal surgery. The combination of above four indices was more accurate than one single variable in predicting PMV and had higher diagnostic value.
10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20220211-00121
Intra-abdominal sepsis: new definitions and current clinical standards.
Hecker A,Reichert M,Reuß C J,Schmoch T,Riedel J G,Schneck E,Padberg W,Weigand M A,Hecker M
Langenbeck's archives of surgery
PURPOSE:The abdomen is the second most common source of sepsis and is associated with unacceptably high morbidity and mortality. Recently, the essential definitions of sepsis and septic shock were updated (Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock, Sepsis-3) and modified. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the changes introduced by Sepsis-3 and the current state of the art regarding the treatment of abdominal sepsis. RESULTS:While Sepsis-1/2 focused on detecting systemic inflammation as a response to infection, Sepsis-3 defines sepsis as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guideline, which was updated in 2016, recommends rapid diagnosis and initiating standardized therapy. New diagnostic tools, the establishment of antibiotic stewardship programs, and a host of new-generation antibiotics are new landmark changes in the sepsis literature of the last few years. Although the "old" surgical source control consisting of debridement, removal of infected devices, drainage of purulent cavities, and decompression of the abdominal cavity is the gold standard of surgical care, the timing of gastrointestinal reconstruction and closure of the abdominal cavity ("damage control surgery") are discussed intensively in the literature. The SSC guidelines provide evidence-based sepsis therapy. Nevertheless, treating critically ill intensive care patients requires individualized, continuous daily re-evaluation and flexible therapeutic strategies, which can be best discussed in the interdisciplinary rounds of experienced surgeons and intensive care medicals.
10.1007/s00423-019-01752-7
Sepsis and septic shock: New definitions, new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.
Esposito Silvano,De Simone Giuseppe,Boccia Giovanni,De Caro Francesco,Pagliano Pasquale
Journal of global antimicrobial resistance
Sepsis and septic shock are common life-threatening pathologies associated with high mortality and substantial costs for healthcare system. Clinical guidelines and bundles for the management of patients with sepsis have recently been updated. Herein, we review the history of sepsis and related conditions definitions from the first consensus conference in 1991 to nowadays, the epidemiologic data resulting from worldwide studies on incidence and mortality, the diagnostic approaches including the microbiological assessment of infection and the use of several prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers and finally we review the main therapeutic measures as the intravenous immunoglobulin therapy and the administration of appropriate antibiotic treatment to provide patients with sepsis a favourable outcome in the antibiotic-resistance era.
10.1016/j.jgar.2017.06.013
Sepsis and septic shock: current approaches to management.
Thompson Kelly,Venkatesh Balasubramanian,Finfer Simon
Internal medicine journal
Sepsis, defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated host response to infection, is recognised by the World Health Organization as a global health priority. Each year, 5000 of the 18 000 adults with sepsis treated in Australian intensive care units die, with survivors suffering long-term physical, cognitive and psychological dysfunction, which is poorly recognised and frequently untreated. There are currently no effective pharmacological treatments for sepsis, making early recognition, resuscitation and immediate treatment with appropriate antibiotics the key to reducing the burden of resulting disease. The majority of sepsis, around 70-80%, is community acquired making emergency departments and primary care key targets to improve recognition and early management. Case fatality rates for sepsis are decreasing in many countries with the reduction attributed to national or regional screening and quality improvement programmes focused on early identification and immediate treatment. The optimum approach to treating established sepsis has been informed by high-quality, multicentre investigator initiated randomised trials with much of the valuable data coming from National Health and Medical Research Council-funded trials run from Australia. While early recognition and improved management of the acute episode are important steps in reducing death and disability from sepsis, a substantial reduction in the burden of sepsis-related disease requires action across the entire healthcare system. In this narrative review, we provide a summary of current knowledge on epidemiology of sepsis and septic shock and recommendations on the optimum approach to the management of these conditions in adults.
10.1111/imj.14199
Risk factors for progression of Urolith Associated with Obstructive Urosepsis to severe sepsis or septic shock.
BMC urology
INTRODUCTION:To analyze the risk factors for progression of urolith associated with obstructive urosepsis to severe sepsis or septic shock, we had done the retrospective cross-sectional study, which would facilitate the early identification of high-risk patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Datas were retrospectively reviewed from 160 patients, suffering from obstructive urosepsis associated with urolith between December 2013 and December 2019. There were 49 patients complicating by severe sepsis (severe sepsis group), 12 patients complicating by septic shock (septic shock group), and 99 patients without progressing to severe sepsis or septic shock (sepsis group). The data covered age, gender, BMI (body mass index), time interval from ED (emergency department) to admission, WBC count (white blood cell count), NLR (neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio), HGB (hemoglobin), etc. Datas were analyzed by univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The corresponding nomogram prediction model was drawn according to the regression coefficients. RESULTS:Univariate analysis showed that the differences of age, the time interval from ED to admission, history of diabetes mellitus, history of CKI (chronic kidney disease), NLR, HGB, platelet count, TBil (total bilirubin), SCr (serum creatinine), ALB (albumin), PT (prothrombin time), APTT (activated partial thromboplastin time), INR (international normalized ratio), PCT (procalcitonin), and positive rate of pathogens in blood culture were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Multivariatelogistic regression analysis showed that age, SCr, and history of CKI were independent risk factors for progression to severe sepsis, or septic shock (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Aged ≥ 65 years, SCr ≥ 248 mol/L, and history of CKI were independent risk factors for progression of urolith associated with obstructive urosepsis to severe sepsis or septic shock. We need to pay more attention to these aspects, when coming across the patients with urolithic sepsis.
10.1186/s12894-022-00988-8
Risk factors for infection and evaluation of Sepsis-3 in patients with trauma.
American journal of surgery
BACKGROUND:We aim to examine the risk factors associated with infection in trauma patients and the Sepsis-3 definition. METHODS:This was a retrospective cohort study of adult trauma patients admitted to a Level I trauma center between January 2014 and January 2016. RESULTS:A total of 1499 trauma patients met inclusion criteria and 15% (n = 232) had an infection. Only 19.8% (n = 46) of infected patients met criteria for Sepsis-3, with the majority (43%) of infected cases having a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score greater on admission compared to the time of suspected infection. In-hospital death was 7% vs 9% (p = 0.65) between Sepsis-3 and infected patients, respectively. Risk factors associated with infection were female sex, admission SOFA score, Elixhauser score, and severe injury (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION:Patients with trauma often arrive with organ dysfunction, which adds complexity and inaccuracy to the operational definition of Sepsis-3 using changes in SOFA scores. Injury severity score, comorbidities, SOFA score, and sex are risk factors associated with developing an infection after trauma.
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.03.005
Extremity risk factors of sepsis for gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with liver cirrhosis.
Chan Yi-Chia,Chen Chao-Long,Wang Chih-Chi,Lin Chih-Che,Yong Chee-Chien,Chiu King-Wah,Wu Keng-Liang
BMC gastroenterology
BACKGROUND:Liver cirrhosis is a well-known risk factor of sepsis after emergent gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. Elective GI endoscopy before living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), however, may also carry the septic risk among these patients. METHODS:This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of 642 cirrhotic recipients who underwent GI endoscopy from 2008 to 2016. We analyzed the incidence and risk factors of post-endoscopy sepsis during 2008-2012 (experience cohort). Our protocol changed after 2013 (validation cohort) to include antibiotic prophylaxis. RESULTS:In experience cohort, 36 cases (10.5%) of the 342 LDLT candidates experienced sepsis within 48 h after endoscopy. The sepsis rate was significantly higher in patients with hepatic decompensation than patients without (22.2% vs. 9.6% vs. 2.6% in Child C/B/A groups respectively; ×2 = 20.97, P < 0.001). Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, the factors related to post-endoscopy sepsis were the Child score (OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.24-1.71), Child classes B and C (OR 3.80 and 14.13; 95% CI 1.04-13.95 and 3.97-50.23, respectively), hepatic hydrothorax (OR 4.85; 95% CI 1.37-17.20), and use of antibiotic prophylaxis (OR 0.08; 95% CI 0.01-0.64). In validation cohort, antibiotics were given routinely, and all cases of hepatic hydrothorax (n = 10) were drained. Consequently, 4 (1.3%) episodes of sepsis occurred among 300 LDLT candidates, and the incidence was significantly lower than before (1.3% vs. 10.5%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with decompensated cirrhosis and hepatic hydrothorax have higher risk of sepsis following endoscopy. In advanced cirrhotic patients, antibiotic prophylaxis and drainage of hydrothorax may be required to prevent sepsis before elective GI endoscopy.
10.1186/s12876-022-02124-0
A prediction model for predicting the risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome in sepsis patients: a retrospective cohort study.
BMC pulmonary medicine
BACKGROUND:The risk of death in sepsis patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was as high as 20-50%. Few studies focused on the risk identification of ARDS among sepsis patients. This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram to predict the ARDS risk in sepsis patients based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. METHODS:A total of 16,523 sepsis patients were included and randomly divided into the training and testing sets with a ratio of 7:3 in this retrospective cohort study. The outcomes were defined as the occurrence of ARDS for ICU patients with sepsis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used in the training set to identify the factors that were associated with ARDS risk, which were adopted to establish the nomogram. The receiver operating characteristic and calibration curves were used to assess the predictive performance of nomogram. RESULTS:Totally 2422 (20.66%) sepsis patients occurred ARDS, with the median follow-up time of 8.47 (5.20, 16.20) days. The results found that body mass index, respiratory rate, urine output, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, blood urea nitrogen, vasopressin, continuous renal replacement therapy, ventilation status, chronic pulmonary disease, malignant cancer, liver disease, septic shock and pancreatitis might be predictors. The area under the curve of developed model were 0.811 (95% CI 0.802-0.820) in the training set and 0.812 (95% CI 0.798-0.826) in the testing set. The calibration curve showed a good concordance between the predicted and observed ARDS among sepsis patients. CONCLUSION:We developed a model incorporating thirteen clinical features to predict the ARDS risk in patients with sepsis. The model showed a good predictive ability by internal validation.
10.1186/s12890-023-02365-z
Risk factors for the development of sepsis in patients with cirrhosis in intensive care units.
Clinical and translational science
Sepsis is a serious complication of liver cirrhosis. This study aimed to develop a risk prediction model for sepsis among patients with liver cirrhosis. A total of 3130 patients with liver cirrhosis were enrolled from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database, and randomly assigned into training and validation cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to filter variables and select predictor variables. Multivariate logistic regression was used to establish the prediction model. Based on LASSO and multivariate logistic regression, gender, base excess, bicarbonate, white blood cells, potassium, fibrinogen, systolic blood pressure, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressor use were identified as independent risk variables, and then a nomogram was constructed and validated. The consistency index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to measure the predictive performance of the nomogram. As a result of the nomogram, good discrimination was achieved, with C-indexes of 0.814 and 0.828 for the training and validation cohorts, respectively, and an area under the curve of 0.849 in the training cohort and 0.821 in the validation cohort. The calibration curves demonstrated good agreement between the predictions and observations. The DCA curves showed the nomogram had significant clinical value. We developed and validated a risk-prediction model for sepsis in patients with liver cirrhosis. This model can assist clinicians in the early detection and prevention of sepsis in patients with liver cirrhosis.
10.1111/cts.13549
Epidemiology of sepsis and septic shock.
Chiu Catherine,Legrand Matthieu
Current opinion in anaesthesiology
PURPOSE OF REVIEW:The epidemiology of sepsis and septic shock has been challenging to study for multiple reasons. These include changing diagnostic definitions, as well a high concentration of sepsis-related studies published from high-income countries (HICs), despite a large global burden. This section attempts to address the incidence of sepsis throughout the years and worldwide. RECENT FINDINGS:The incidence of sepsis and septic shock has continued to increase since the first consensus definitions (Sepsis-1) were established in 1991, and the latest definitions (Sepsis-3) provide a better reflection of mortality risk for a diagnosis of sepsis. Several studies argue that the incidence of sepsis is overreported in HICs, based on billing and coding practices, and may lead to overutilization of resources. However, recent estimates of the true global burden of sepsis, including low-income countries, are likely much higher than reported, with calls for better allocation of resources. SUMMARY:The true epidemiology of sepsis worldwide continues to be a highly debated subject, and more research is needed among low-income countries and high-risk subpopulations.
10.1097/ACO.0000000000000958
Clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with ICU-acquired infections in sepsis: A retrospective cohort study.
Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology
Intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infection is a common cause of poor prognosis of sepsis in the ICU. However, sepsis-associated ICU-acquired infections have not been fully characterized. The study aims to assess the risk factors and develop a model that predicts the risk of ICU-acquired infections in patients with sepsis. Methods:We retrieved data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) IV database. Patients were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts at a 7:3 ratio. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify independent risk factors that could predict ICU-acquired infection. We also assessed its discrimination and calibration abilities and compared them with classical score systems. Results:Of 16,808 included septic patients, 2,871 (17.1%) developed ICU-acquired infection. These patients with ICU-acquired infection had a 17.7% ICU mortality and 31.8% in-hospital mortality and showed a continued rise in mortality from 28 to 100 days after ICU admission. The classical Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Score (SIRS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Oxford Acute Severity of Illness Score (OASIS), Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score (LODS), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and Acute Physiology Score III (APS III) scores were associated with ICU-acquired infection, and cerebrovascular insufficiency, Gram-negative bacteria, surgical ICU, tracheostomy, central venous catheter, urinary catheter, mechanical ventilation, red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, LODS score and anticoagulant therapy were independent predictors of developing ICU-acquired infection in septic patients. The nomogram on the basis of these independent predictors showed good calibration and discrimination in both the derivation (AUROC = 0.737; 95% CI, 0.725-0.749) and validation (AUROC = 0.751; 95% CI, 0.734-0.769) populations and was superior to that of SIRS, SOFA, OASIS, SAPS II, LODS, CCI, and APS III models. Conclusions:ICU-acquired infections increase the likelihood of septic mortality. The individualized prognostic model on the basis of the nomogram could accurately predict ICU-acquired infection and optimize management or tailored therapy.
10.3389/fcimb.2022.962470