Myocardial contrast echocardiography evaluation of coronary microvascular dysfunction to Predict MACEs in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction follow-up. BMC cardiovascular disorders BACKGROUND:CMD refers to the abnormalities of the tiny arteries and capillaries within the coronary artery system, which result in restricted or abnormal blood flow. CMD is an important mechanism involved in ischemic heart disease and secondary heart failure. CMD can explain left ventricular dysfunction and poor prognosis.The European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging recommends the use of MCE for the assessment of myocardial perfusion. Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) is used to evaluate the accuracy of Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) at follow-up. METHODS:The clinical data of 142 patients diagnosed with HFpEF in our hospital from January 2020 to January 2022 were retrospectively summarized and stratified into 77 cases (> 1) in the CMD group and 65 cases (= 1) in the non-CMD group based on the perfusion score index (PSI) of the 17 segments of the left ventricle examined by the admission MCE, and the perfusion parameters were measured at the same time, including the peak plateau intensity (A value), the curve slope of the curve rise (βvalue) and A × β values. At a median follow-up of 27 months till October 2023, MACEs were recorded mainly including heart failure exacerbation, revascularization, cardiac death, etc. RESULTS: Increasing age, hypertension, diabetes, and coronary artery disease in the CMD group resulted in decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), increased plasma NT-B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), decreased A-values and A × β-values, and an increased incidence of MACEs (P < 0.05). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that LVGLS (HR = 1.714, 95% CI = 1.289-2.279, P < 0.001) and A × β values (HR = 0.636, 95% CI = 0.417 to 0.969, P = 0.035) were independent predictors of MACEs in patients with HFpEF. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of LVGLS combined with A × β value for diagnosis of MACEs was 0.861 (95% CI = 0.761 ~ 0.961, P < 0.001), which was significantly higher than that of LVGLS or A × β value (P < 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the cumulative survival rate in CMD group was significantly lower than non-CMD group (logrank χ = 6.626, P = 0.010), with the most significant difference at 20 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION:MCE can evaluate CMD semi-quantitatively and quantitatively, LVGLS combined with A × β value has good performance in predicting the risk of developing MACEs in patients with HFpEF at 3 years of follow-up, and CMD can be used as an important non-invasive indicator for assessing clinical prognosis. 10.1186/s12872-024-04173-7

Contrast Stress Echocardiography Findings in Myocardial Bridging Compared to Normal Coronary Course, With and Without Coronary Artery Disease. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography BACKGROUND:Myocardial bridging (MB) correlation with ischemia remains a diagnostic challenge. There is a lack of studies that have assessed MB using contrast stress echo and compared the findings with those in patients demonstrating a normal coronary course, with or without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS:We evaluated all consecutive patients who underwent contrast stress echocardiography and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) due to suspected symptoms of CAD within 3 months in Parma Hospital. Coronary computed tomography angiography served as the reference standard for detecting MB and obstructive CAD. The patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) MB and no evidence of obstructive CAD (MB group, N = 64), (2) no evidence of obstructive CAD or MB (NoCAD group, N = 135), (3) obstructive CAD without MB (CAD group, N = 68). RESULTS:The coronary flow velocity reserve in the LAD (CFVR-LAD) was reduced in the MB and CAD groups, measuring 1.91 ± 0.21 and 1.82 ± 0.28, respectively, whereas it was 2.27 ± 0.34 in the NoCAD group (P < .001). The MB and CAD groups exhibited a higher prevalence of reversible myocardial perfusion defects (rMPDs) compared to the NoCAD group (57.8% vs 64.7% vs 3.7%, P < .001). Reversible wall motion abnormalities were frequently observed in the CAD group and rarely found in the MB and NoCAD groups (47.1% vs 18.8% vs 4.4%, P < .001). In multivariable analyses, the presence of MB was independently associated with reduced CFVR-LAD (odds ratio = 14.55; 95% CI, 6.84-30.93; P < .001) and the presence of rMPD (odds ratio = 37.96; 95% CI, 13.49-106.84; P < .001). Patients with deep MB (>2 mm depth) and very deep MB (≥5 mm depth) exhibited significantly greater CFVR-LAD reduction and rMPD than those with superficial MB. CONCLUSIONS:Myocardial bridging is capable of inducing rMPD and reducing CFVR-LAD similar to obstructive CAD. The depth of the MB correlates with the abnormalities found in the stress echo evaluation. Contrast stress echo may serve as a valuable noninvasive tool for evaluating patients with MB. 10.1016/j.echo.2023.06.008

Myocardial perfusion imaging using contrast echocardiography. Pathan Faraz,Marwick Thomas H Progress in cardiovascular diseases Microbubbles are an excellent intravascular tracer, and both the rate of myocardial opacification (analogous to coronary microvascular perfusion) and contrast intensity (analogous to myocardial blood volume) provide unique insights into myocardial perfusion. A strong evidence base has been accumulated to show comparability with nuclear perfusion imaging and incremental diagnostic and prognostic value relative to wall motion analysis. This technique also provides the possibility to measure myocardial perfusion at the bedside. Despite all of these advantages, the technique is complicated, technically challenging, and has failed to scale legislative and financial hurdles. The development of targeted imaging and therapeutic interventions will hopefully rekindle interest in this interesting modality. 10.1016/j.pcad.2015.03.005

Contrast echocardiography in daily clinical practice. Eskandari M,Monaghan M Herz Ultrasound contrast agents have unique acoustic properties that enable them to enhance the cardiac blood flow and thus are used broadly in modern echocardiography laboratories for salvage of nondiagnostic studies, improving accuracy and reducing variability even in the presence of adequate image quality. Contrast echocardiography is also used as an adjunctive technique when unenhanced echocardiography falls short in the differentiation of cardiac structural abnormalities such as cardiac masses. Ultrasound contrast agents are pure intravascular tracers. Development of innovative ultrasound imaging techniques has led to myocardial perfusion imaging with contrast echocardiography. Although currently an off-label indication, it has been shown that perfusion imaging with contrast echocardiography adds incremental value to stress echocardiography in the detection of coronary artery disease. Moreover, it can be used for assessment of myocardial viability. In this paper we briefly discuss the basics of contrast echocardiography and its use in daily clinical practice. 10.1007/s00059-017-4533-x