logo logo
Treatment of acute coronary syndrome: Part 1: Non-ST-segment acute coronary syndrome. Trost Jeffrey C,Lange Richard A Critical care medicine OBJECTIVE:Acute coronary syndrome is a common cause of morbidity and mortality, both in the United States and worldwide. The goal of this review is to familiarize clinicians with recent information regarding the diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndrome. DATA SOURCES:PubMed search and review of the relevant medical literature. SUMMARY:Acute coronary syndrome encompasses three clinical diagnoses: unstable angina, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction), and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The definition, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction are reviewed here. Diagnosing unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is a significant challenge in critically ill patients not initially suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (i.e., noncardiac intensive care unit patients), and diagnostic and treatment strategies for these patients have not been clearly established. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with acute coronary syndrome benefit from intensive medical therapy, including antianginal, antiplatelet, antithrombotic, and statin agents. Depending on their risk for future cardiovascular events as well as their risk of bleeding complications, patients may benefit from either an early invasive treatment strategy, in which routine coronary revascularization is performed, or a conservative strategy, in which revascularization is reserved for patients with recurrent or provocable cardiac ischemia. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821e855f
Long-term cardiac outcomes of depression screening, diagnosis and treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome: the DEPACS study. Psychological medicine BACKGROUND:To investigate the impacts of depression screening, diagnosis and treatment on major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS:Prospective cohort study including a nested 24-week randomised clinical trial for treating depression was performed with 5-12 years after the index ACS. A total of 1152 patients recently hospitalised with ACS were recruited from 2006 to 2012, and were divided by depression screening and diagnosis at baseline and 24-week treatment allocation into five groups: 651 screening negative (N), 55 screening positive but no depressive disorder (S), 149 depressive disorder randomised to escitalopram (E), 151 depressive disorder randomised to placebo (P) and 146 depressive disorder receiving medical treatment only (M). RESULTS:Cumulative MACE incidences over a median 8.4-year follow-up period were 29.6% in N, 43.6% in S, 40.9% in E, 53.6% in P and 59.6% in M. Compared to N, screening positive was associated with higher incidence of MACE [adjusted hazards ratio 2.15 (95% confidence interval 1.63-2.83)]. No differences were found between screening positive with and without a formal depressive disorder diagnosis. Of those screening positive, E was associated with a lower incidence of MACE than P and M. M had the worst outcomes even compared to P, despite significantly milder depressive symptoms at baseline. CONCLUSIONS:Routine depression screening in patients with recent ACS and subsequent appropriate treatment of depression could improve long-term cardiac outcomes. 10.1017/S003329171900388X
High-Sensitivity Troponin T vs I in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Prediction of Significant Coronary Lesions and Long-term Prognosis. Kvisvik Brede,Mørkrid Lars,Røsjø Helge,Cvancarova Milada,Rowe Alexander D,Eek Christian,Bendz Bjørn,Edvardsen Thor,Gravning Jørgen Clinical chemistry BACKGROUND:High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) T and I assays are established as crucial tools for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), as they have been found superior to old troponin assays. However, eventual differences between the assays in prediction of significant coronary lesions and long-term prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have not been fully unraveled. METHODS:Serum concentrations of hs-cTnT (Roche), hs-cTnI (Abbott), and amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP; Roche) in 390 non-ST-elevation (NSTE) ACS patients were evaluated in relation to significant coronary lesions on coronary angiography (defined as a stenosis >50% of the luminal diameter, with need for revascularization) and prognostic accuracy for cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, as well as the composite end point of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalizations for AMI or heart failure. RESULTS:The mean (SD) follow-up was 2921 (168) days. Absolute hs-cTnI concentrations were significantly higher than the hs-cTnT concentrations. The relationship between analyzed biomarkers and significant coronary lesions on coronary angiography, as quantified by the area under the ROC curve (AUC), revealed no difference between hs-cTnT [AUC, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77-0.86] and hs-cTnI (AUC, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.76-0.86; P = NS). NT-proBNP was superior to both hs-cTn assays regarding prognostic accuracy for both cardiovascular and all-cause mortality and for the composite end point during follow-up, also in multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS:The hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI assays displayed a similar ability to predict significant coronary lesions in NSTE-ACS patients. NT-proBNP was superior to both hs-cTn assays as a marker of long-term prognosis in this patient group. 10.1373/clinchem.2016.261107
Modifying effects of depression on the association between BDNF methylation and prognosis of acute coronary syndrome. Kim Jae-Min,Stewart Robert,Kim Ju-Wan,Kang Hee-Ju,Lee Ju-Yeon,Kim Seon-Young,Kim Sung-Wan,Shin Il-Seon,Hong Young Joon,Ahn Youngkeun,Jeong Myung Ho,Yoon Jin-Sang Brain, behavior, and immunity AIMS:Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) plays important roles in angiogenesis, inflammation, and neuronal plasticity. BDNF methylation has been extensively investigated in depression, but not in cardiac diseases. We asked whether BDNF methylation status is associated with a major adverse cardiac event (MACE), inflammation, and the association with depression comorbidity and its treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS AND RESULTS:A cross-sectional baseline study and nested 24 week double-blind escitalopram placebo-controlled trial (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier NCT00419471) were performed from 2006 to 2012, with 5-12 year follow-up for MACE. Patients with recent ACS (969 total) were divided into four groups according to depression comorbidity at baseline and treatment allocation: 591, absent depression; 127, depression on escitalopram; 128, depression on placebo; 123, depression on care as usual (CAU). BDNF methylation was measured in leucocyte DNA, and multiple demographic and clinical characteristics including interleukin 6 were evaluated as covariates at baseline. The primary outcome, time to first MACE (a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention), was investigated using Cox regression models after adjustment for covariates. Interleukin 6 level was significantly higher in patients with higher BDNF methylation values. Higher BDNF methylation was associated with increased MACE independent of confounding factors [HR (95% CI) = 1.45 (1.17-1.78)]. This association was significant in patients without depression [HR (95% CI) = 1.39 (1.01-1.90)] and depressive patients on placebo [HR (95% CI) = 1.72 (1.02-3.02)] or CAU [HR (95% CI) = 1.53 (1.01-2.61)], but not in those treated with escitalopram [HR (95% CI) = 1.00 (0.51-1.95)]. CONCLUSION:BDNF methylation was significantly associated with prognosis of ACS. Escitalopram may mitigate the deleterious effect of higher BDNF methylation in depressive patients with ACS. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanistics and to assess the generalisability of these findings. 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.06.038
Efficacy of High-Sensitivity Troponin T in Identifying Very-Low-Risk Patients With Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome. Peacock W Frank,Baumann Brigette M,Bruton Deborah,Davis Thomas E,Handy Beverly,Jones Christopher W,Hollander Judd E,Limkakeng Alexander T,Mehrotra Abhi,Than Martin,Ziegler Andre,Dinkel Carina JAMA cardiology Importance:Physicians need information on how to use the first available high-sensitivity troponin (hsTnT) assay in the United States to identify patients at very low risk for 30-day adverse cardiac events (ACE). Objective:To determine whether a negative hsTnT assay at 0 and 3 hours following emergency department presentation could identify patients at less than 1% risk of a 30-day ACE. Design, Setting, and Participants:A prospective, observational study at 15 emergency departments in the United States between 2011 and 2015 that included individuals 21 years and older, presenting to the emergency department with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Of 1690 eligible individuals, 15 (no cardiac troponin T measurement) and 320 (missing a 0-hour or 3-hour sample) were excluded from the analyses. Exposures:Serial hsTnT measurements (fifth-generation Roche Elecsys hsTnT assay). Main Outcomes and Measures:Serial blood samples from each patient were collected after emergency department presentation (once identified as a potential patient with acute coronary syndrome) and 3 hours, 6 to 9 hours, and 12 to 24 hours later. Adverse cardiac events were defined as myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, or death. The upper reference level for the hsTnT assay, defined as the 99th percentile, was established as 19 ng/L in a separate healthy US cohort. Patients were considered ruled out for acute myocardial infarction if their hsTnT level at 0 hours and 3 hours was less than the upper reference level. Gold standard diagnoses were determined by a clinical end point committee. Evaluation of assay clinical performance for acute myocardial infarction rule-out was prespecified; the hypothesis regarding 30-day ACE was formulated after data collection. Results:In 1301 healthy volunteers (50.4% women; median age, 48 years), the upper reference level was 19 ng/L. In 1600 patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (48.4% women; median age, 55 years), a single hsTnTlevel less than 6 ng/L at baseline had a negative predictive value for AMI of 99.4%. In 974 patients (77.1%) with both 0-hour and 3-hour hsTnT levels of 19 ng/L or less, the negative predictive value for 30-day ACE was 99.3% (95% CI, 99.1-99.6). Using sex-specific cutpoints, C statistics for women (0.952) and men (0.962) were similar for acute myocardial infarction. Conclusions and Relevance:A single hsTnT level less than 6 ng/L was associated with a markedly decreased risk of AMI, while serial levels at 19 ng/L or less identified patients at less than 1% risk of 30-day ACE. 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.4625
Acute coronary syndrome and depression: A review of shared pathophysiological pathways. Granville Smith Isabelle,Parker Gordon,Rourke Poppy,Cvejic Erin,Vollmer-Conna Uté The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry OBJECTIVE:To examine the evidence for shared pathophysiological pathways in acute coronary syndrome and major depression and to conceptualise the dynamic interplay of biological systems and signalling pathways that link acute coronary syndrome and depression within a framework of neuro-visceral integration. METHODS:Relevant articles were sourced via a search of published literature from MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed using a variety of search terms relating to biological connections between acute coronary syndrome and depression. Additional articles from bibliographies of retrieved papers were assessed and included where relevant. RESULTS:Despite considerable research efforts, a clear understanding of the biological processes connecting acute coronary syndrome and depression has not been achieved. Shared abnormalities are evident across the immune, platelet/endothelial and autonomic/stress-response systems. From the available evidence, it seems unlikely that a single explanatory model could account for the complex interactions of biological pathways driving the pathophysiology of these disorders and their comorbidity. CONCLUSION:A broader conceptual framework of mind-body or neuro-visceral integration that can incorporate the existence of several causative scenarios may be more useful in directing future research and treatment approaches for acute coronary syndrome-associated depression. 10.1177/0004867415597304
The effect of enhanced depression care on anxiety symptoms in acute coronary syndrome patients: findings from the COPES trial. Kronish Ian M,Chaplin William F,Rieckmann Nina,Burg Matthew M,Davidson Karina W Psychotherapy and psychosomatics 10.1159/000332439
Collaborative care for depression and anxiety disorders in patients with recent cardiac events: the Management of Sadness and Anxiety in Cardiology (MOSAIC) randomized clinical trial. Huffman Jeff C,Mastromauro Carol A,Beach Scott R,Celano Christopher M,DuBois Christina M,Healy Brian C,Suarez Laura,Rollman Bruce L,Januzzi James L JAMA internal medicine IMPORTANCE:Depression and anxiety are associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with recent acute cardiac events. There has been minimal study of collaborative care (CC) management models for mental health disorders in high-risk cardiac inpatients, and no prior CC intervention has simultaneously managed depression and anxiety disorders. OBJECTIVE:To determine the impact of a low-intensity CC intervention for depression, generalized anxiety disorder, and panic disorder among patients hospitalized for an acute cardiac illness. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:Single-blind randomized clinical trial, with study assessors blind to group assignment, from September 2010 through July 2013 of 183 patients admitted to inpatient cardiac units in an urban academic general hospital for acute coronary syndrome, arrhythmia, or heart failure and found to have clinical depression, generalized anxiety disorder, or panic disorder on structured assessment. INTERVENTIONS:Participants were randomized to 24 weeks of a low-intensity telephone-based multicomponent CC intervention targeting depression and anxiety disorders (n = 92) or to enhanced usual care (serial notification of primary medical providers; n = 91). The CC intervention used a social work care manager to coordinate assessment and stepped care of psychiatric conditions and to provide support and therapeutic interventions as appropriate. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:Improvement in mental health-related quality of life (Short Form-12 Mental Component Score [SF-12 MCS]) at 24 weeks, compared between groups using a random-effects model in an intent-to-treat analysis. RESULTS:Patients randomized to CC had significantly greater estimated mean improvements in SF-12 MCS at 24 weeks (11.21 points [from 34.21 to 45.42] in the CC group vs 5.53 points [from 36.30 to 41.83] in the control group; estimated mean difference, 5.68 points [95% CI, 2.14-9.22]; P = .002; effect size, 0.61). Patients receiving CC also had significant improvements in depressive symptoms and general functioning, and higher rates of treatment of a mental health disorder; anxiety scores, rates of disorder response, and adherence did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:A novel telephone-based, low-intensity model to concurrently manage cardiac patients with depression and/or anxiety disorders was effective for improving mental health-related quality of life in a 24-week trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION:clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01201967. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.739
Prophylactic antidepressant treatment following acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of psychiatric research Major depressive disorder is significantly increased in patients following acute coronary syndrome resulting in twofold increased mortality compared with patients without depression. The depression diagnosis is often missed leading to considerable undertreatment. This systematic review assesses the current evidence of primary prophylactic treatment of depression in patients after acute coronary syndrome. The study protocol was prospectively registered at PROSPERO (registration number CRD42015025587). A systematic review were conducted and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and Cochran Library was searched. Two independent reviewers screened the records. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials on adult patients with acute coronary syndrome treated prophylactically with an antidepressant intervention of any kind. A validated assessment tool should measure depression and depressive symptoms. Languages were limited to articles written in English. Six articles were included. Four studies utilized different components of case and disease management, health coaching, or relaxational audiotapes as intervention compared with usual care or with no formal program of rehabilitation. None of the studies showed any significant prophylactic effect against depression. One study with a program of health education and counselling and another study with a pharmacological antidepressant showed significant prophylactic effect on depression and depressive symptoms. All six included studies were associated with high risk of bias. There is not strong evidence of the effects of any type of routine antidepressant prophylaxis in patients following acute coronary syndrome. Further high quality studies are warranted. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.07.016
Evaluating the impact of depression, anxiety & autonomic function on health related quality of life, vocational functioning and health care utilisation in acute coronary syndrome patients: the ADVENT study protocol. Oldroyd John C,Cyril Sheila,Wijayatilaka Bhanuja S,O'Neil Adrienne,McKenzie Dean P,Zavarsek Silva,Sanderson Kristy,Hare David L,Fisher Aaron J,Forbes Andrew B,Barr Taylor Craig,Clarke David M,Meredith Ian T,Oldenburg Brian BMC cardiovascular disorders BACKGROUND:Depression and anxiety are highly prevalent and co-morbid in acute coronary syndrome patients. Somatic and cognitive subtypes of depression and anxiety in acute coronary syndrome have been shown to be associated with mortality although their association with patient outcomes is unknown, as are the mechanisms that underpin these associations. We are conducting a prospective cohort study which aims to examine in acute coronary syndrome patients: (1) the role of somatic subtypes of depression and anxiety as predictors of health related quality of life outcomes; (2) how somatic subtypes of depression and anxiety relate to long term vocational functioning and healthcare utilisation; and (3) the role of the autonomic nervous system assessed by heart rate variability as a moderator of these associations. METHODS:Patients are being screened after index admission for acute coronary syndrome at a single, high volume centre, MonashHeart, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia. The inclusion criterion is all patients aged > 21 years old and fluent in English admitted to MonashHeart, Monash Health with a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. The primary outcome is mean health related quality of life (Short Form-36) Physical and Mental Health Summary scores at 12 and 24 months in subtypes with somatic symptoms of depression and anxiety. Depressive domains are assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory II and the Cardiac Depression Scale. Anxiety is measured using the Speilberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Crown Crisp Phobic Anxiety questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include clinical variables, healthcare service utilisation and vocational functioning. DISCUSSION:This manuscript presents the protocol for a prospective cohort study which will investigate the role of somatic subtypes of depression and anxiety as predictors of health related quality of life, long-term vocational functioning and health service use, and the role of the autonomic nervous system in moderating these associations. Findings from the study have the potential to inform more effective pharmacological, psychological and behavioural interventions and better guide health policy on the use of health care resources. 10.1186/1471-2261-13-103
Comparing the effects of depression, anxiety, and comorbidity on quality-of-life, adverse outcomes, and medical expenditure in Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome. Xia Kun,Wang Le-Feng,Yang Xin-Chun,Jiang Hong-Yan,Zhang Li-Jing,Yao Dao-Kuo,Hu Da-Yi,Ding Rong-Jing Chinese medical journal BACKGROUND:Depression and anxiety have been correlated with elevated risks for quality-of-life (QOL), adverse outcomes, and medical expenditure in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the relevant data are lacking for Chinese ACS populations, especially regarding different effects of major depression, anxiety, and comorbidity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the dynamic changes of depression and/or anxiety over 12 months and examine the effects of depression, anxiety, and comorbidity on QOL, adverse outcomes, and medical expenditure in Chinese patients with ACS. METHODS:For this prospective longitudinal study, a total of 647 patients with ACS were recruited from North China between January 2013 and June 2015. Among them, 531 patients (82.1%) completed 12-month follow-ups. Logistic regression model was utilized for analyzing the association of baseline major depression, anxiety, and comorbidity with 12-month all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, QOL, and health expenditure. RESULTS:During a follow-up period of 12 months, 7.3% experienced non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and 35.8% cardiac re-hospitalization. Baseline comorbidity, rather than major depression/anxiety, strongly predicted poor 12-month QOL as measured by short-form health survey-12 (odds ratio [OR]: 1.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-2.52, P = 0.003). Regarding 12-month non-fatal MI and cardiac re-hospitalization, baseline anxiety (OR: 2.83, 95% CI: 1.33-5.89, P < 0.01; OR: 4.47, 95% CI: 1.50-13.00, P < 0.01), major depression (OR: 2.58, 95% CI: 1.02-6.15, P < 0.05; OR: 5.22, 95% CI: 1.42-17.57, P < 0.03), and comorbidity (OR: 6.33, 95% CI: 2.96-13.79, P < 0.0001, OR: 14.08, 95% CI: 4.99-41.66, P < 0.0001) were all independent predictors, and comorbidity had the highest predictive value. Number of re-hospitalization stay, admission frequency within 12 months and medical expenditure within 2 months were the highest in patients with ACS with comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS:Major depression and anxiety may predict 12-month non-fatal MI and cardiac re-hospitalization. However, comorbidity has the highest predictive value with greater medical expenditure and worse QOL in Chinese patients with ACS. And depression with comorbid anxiety may be a new target of mood status in patients with ACS. 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000215
I-CARE randomized clinical trial integrating depression and acute coronary syndrome care in low-resource hospitals in China: Design and rationale. Li Shenshen,Blumenthal James A,Shi Chuan,Millican Danielle,Li Xian,Du Xin,Patel Anushka,Gao Pei,Delong Elizabeth,Maulik Pallab K,Gao Runlin,Yu Xin,Wu Yangfeng American heart journal Depression and acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are both common public health challenges. Patients with ACS often develop depression, which in turn adversely affects prognosis. Low-cost, sustainable, and effective service models that integrate depression care into the management of ACS patients to reduce depression and improve ACS outcomes are critically needed. Integrating Depression Care in ACS patients in Low Resource Hospitals in China (I-CARE) is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of an 11-month integrated care (IC) intervention compared to usual care (UC) in management of ACS patients. Four thousand inpatients will be recruited and then randomized in a 1:1 ratio to an IC intervention consisting of nurse-led risk factor management, group-based counseling supplemented by individual problem-solving therapy, and antidepressant medications as needed, or to UC. The primary outcomes are depression symptoms measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 at 6 and 12 months. Secondary endpoints include anxiety measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7; quality of life measured by the EQ-5D at 6 and 12 months; and major adverse events including the combined end point of all-cause death, suicide attempts, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and all-cause rehospitalization at yearly intervals for a median follow-up of 2 years. Analyses of the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of IC also will be performed. I-CARE trial will be the largest study to test the effectiveness of an integrated care model on depression and cardiovascular outcomes among ACS patients in resource-limited clinical settings. 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.05.004
Predictive value of depression and anxiety for long-term mortality: differences in outcome between acute coronary syndrome and stable angina pectoris. de Jager Tom A J,Dulfer Karolijn,Radhoe Sumant,Bergmann Michael J,Daemen Joost,van Domburg Ron T,Lenzen Mattie J,Utens Elisabeth M W J International journal of cardiology BACKGROUND:Since the early 2000s the treatment of choice for an acute myocardial infarction has moved from thrombolytic therapy to primary PCI (pPCI). As a result, the majority of patients undergoing PCI shifted from stable angina pectoris (SA) to acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Additionally the previously observed association between depression and anxiety and long-term outcome in patients who underwent a PCI may have been changed. The main objective of this study was to investigate the predictive value of depression and anxiety for 10-year mortality, in a cohort with post-PCI patients treated for SA versus patients treated for ACS. METHODS:This prospective single center cohort consists of a consecutive series of patients (n=528) treated with PCI. At 1month post-PCI, patients completed the Dutch version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS:After adjustment for baseline characteristics depression was associated with higher 10-year mortality post-PCI (HR 1.58 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI] 1.04-2.40). In the ACS population no association between depression and 10-year mortality was found (HR 1.05 95% CI 0.62-1.79), in contrast to the SA population (HR 1.97 95% CI 1.09-3.57). After additional adjustment for anxiety, depression was no longer associated with higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS:Anxiety at baseline was associated with an increased 10-year mortality rate after PCI. Depression was also associated with higher 10-year mortality, however the association disappeared after additional adjustment for anxiety. This finding was more pronounced in patients presenting with SA as compared to those presenting with ACS, which might be a result of the increasing number of ACS patients treated with pPCI. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.10.005
Anxiety, depression, and cardiac outcomes after a first diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. Ossola Paolo,Gerra Maria Lidia,De Panfilis Chiara,Tonna Matteo,Marchesi Carlo Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association OBJECTIVE:Depression is an established risk factor for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), with an impact on cardiac prognosis; nonetheless, the literature disagrees on the role played by anxiety. No study has evaluated this relationship in a cardiac population with no history of depression and after their first diagnosis of ACS. The aim of this study is to explore these associations without the confounding role of long-lasting heart disease or psychiatric illnesses. METHOD:Two hundred sixty-six patients with no history of depression completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorder at baseline and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months follow-up after their first diagnosis of ACS. During the follow-up period, we collected information regarding the major adverse cardiac events. RESULTS:Developing a first-ever depressive episode, in a proportional hazard model, was associated with almost 3 times the risk of a recurrent cardiac event (odds ratio = 2.590, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.321, 5.078], p = .006). Furthermore, a moderation analysis revealed that increasing levels of baseline anxiety had opposing effects on cardiac outcomes, being protective only in those who did not develop incident depression (B = -0.0824, 95% CI [-0.164, -0.005], p = .048). No dose-response effect between depressive or anxious symptoms and cardiac outcomes emerged. CONCLUSION:Our results confirm the detrimental effect of depression on cardiac prognosis in a selected population and suggest that anxiety after the first diagnosis of ACS might have different roles depending on the illness' course. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved). 10.1037/hea0000658
Longitudinal impact of anxiety on depressive outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome: Findings from the K-DEPACS study. Kim Sang-Dae,Kang Hee-Ju,Bae Kyung-Yeol,Kim Sung-Wan,Shin Il-Seon,Hong Young Joon,Ahn Youngkeun,Jeong Myung Ho,Yoon Jin-Sang,Kim Jae-Min Psychiatry research This study investigated the impact of anxiety evaluated within 2 weeks of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) episode on depressive outcomes at a 1-year follow-up assessment. In 828 ACS patients, anxiety was determined by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-anxiety subscale at baseline, and DSM-IV depressive disorders and depressive symptoms were evaluated both at baseline and follow-up. Anxiety at baseline was significantly associated with depressive disorder at the follow-up and less improvement in depressive symptoms over 1-year. Anxiety had negative longitudinal impacts on depressive outcomes of ACS, and therefore evaluation of anxiety could be recommended in recently developed ACS patients. 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.003
Screening for depression in acute coronary syndrome patients: A comparison of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 versus Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression. Yuan Jie,Ding Rongjing,Wang Li,Sheng Li,Li Jianchao,Hu Dayi Journal of psychosomatic research OBJECTIVE:To assess the reliability and criterion validity of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) versus Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression (HADS-D) as screening instruments for depression in patients with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS:A total of 782 patients were recruited from four local hospitals. All of them completed the questionnaires of PHQ-9 and HADS-D. The measures of PHQ-9 and HADS-D were validated against the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), a gold diagnostic criterion for major depressive disorder (MDD). RESULTS:Based upon the MINI, the prevalence of MDD was 15.6% in Chinese ACS patients. Two scales demonstrated excellent internal consistencies (Cronbach's α > 0.8). The diagnostic accuracy of PHQ-9 and HADS-D for diagnosing MDD was moderate with areas under receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve of 0.842 (95%CI: 0.806-0.894) and 0.813 (95%CI: 0.767-0.852), respectively. The optimal cutoff points of PHQ-9 and HADS-D for screening MDD were 10 and 9, respectively. Comparing the operating characteristics of PHQ-9 and HADS-D, the specificity was similar (84.7% vs. 85.5%, p = .40) while the sensitivity of PHQ-9 was significantly higher than HADS-D (86.9% vs. 76.2%, p = .001). CONCLUSION:Chinese versions of PHQ-9 and HADS-D are reliable and valid screening instruments for MDD in ACS patients. The PHQ-9 performs better in minimizing missed diagnoses. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.03.018