Vertical femoral neck fractures in patients younger than 65 years of age often require hip-conserving surgeries. However, traditional fixation strategies using three parallel cannulated screws often fail in such patients due to an unfavorable biomechanical environment. This study compared different cannulated screw fixation techniques in patients via patient-specific finite element analysis with linear tetrahedral (C3D4) elements. Forty vertical femoral neck fracture models were created based on computed tomography images obtained from eight healthy participants. Five different fixation strategies: alpha, buttress, rhomboid, inverted triangle, and triangle were assessed in walking status. Biomechanical parameters including stiffness, interfragmentary motion in two directions (detachment and shearing), compression force, and maximal implant stress were evaluated. The mean relative coefficient of strain distribution between the finite element analysis and experiment was from 0.78 to 0.94. Stiffness was highest (p < .05) in the buttress group (923.1 N/mm), while interfragmentary motion was lowest (p < .05) in the alpha group. Maximal stress was highest (p < .05) in the buttress group and lowest in the alpha group. Shearing values were significantly lower in the alpha group than in the rhomboid group (p = .004). Moreover, Shearing values were significantly higher (p = .027), while detachment values were significantly lower (p = .027), in the inverted triangle than in the triangle group. Clinical significance: Our results suggest that alpha fixation is the most reliable and biomechanically efficient strategy for young patients with vertical femoral neck fractures. Regular and inverted triangular fixation strategies may be suitable for fractures of different skeletal constructions due to antidetachment/shearing abilities.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:It remains controversial regarding the optimal type of fixation implant for the treatment of femoral neck fractures (FNFs). Biomechanical rational for implant choices can benefit from the integration of finite element analysis (FEA) in device evaluation and design improvement. In this study, we aim to evaluate biomechanical performance of several internal fixation implants for Pauwels type III FNFs under physiological loading conditions using FEA, as well as to assess the biomechanical contribution of medial buttress plate (MBP) augmentation. METHODS:Several fixation styles for FNFs have been analyzed numerically by the finite element method. Five groups of models were developed with different FNFs fixation implants, including dynamic hip screw (DHS), cannulated screws (CSs), proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA), DHS with MBP augmentation (DHS+MBP), and CSs with MBP (CSs+MBP). For each group, four FE models were established to evaluate strain in bone and stress in devices during walking and stair climbing conditions, which simulated the hip contact force using static and dynamic loadings respectively. RESULTS:No notable differences were observed in peak strain within implanted bone and maximum stress values of the device between DHS and CSs. The implanted femur with PFNA was in a lower state of bone strain and implant stress. Although the buttress plate did not decrease peak bone strain, it alleviated stress concentration on device, especially for CSs under dynamic loadings. CONCLUSIONS:Compared to the other fixation styles, the PFNA showed biomechanical advantages of decreasing risk of implant failure and bone yielding. The MBP augmentation provided an additional load path to bridge fracture fragments, which reduced failure risk of DHS and CSs, especially during dynamic loading scenarios. Although further studies are needed for patients with other types of FNFs, our findings may provide valuable references for device design optimization in terms of complex physiological loadings, as well as for clinical decision making in surgical treatment of FNFs.

In physiologically young patients with displaced femoral neck fractures, surgical treatment is aimed at achieving fracture union while preserving native hip anatomy and biomechanics. The intracapsular environment, tenuous vascular supply, and unfavorable hip biomechanics contribute to the high complication rates seen after osteosynthesis of these fractures. Conventional fixation methods for osteosynthesis of femoral neck fractures include multiple cancellous screws, fixed-angle dynamic implants, and fixed-angle length-stable constructs. Despite several biomechanical and clinical studies evaluating various surgical options, the optimal fixation construct to allow healing and prevent nonunion of displaced femoral neck fractures is not known. This article will review the clinical data regarding conventional fixation constructs and describe the technique and rationale behind 2 novel alternative treatment options for these challenging fractures. The surgical technique and clinical examples for constructs involving multiple cannulated screws/Pauwels screw augmented with a fibular strut graft, as well as a novel fixed-angle locking plate with controlled dynamic compression, are presented.

OBJECTIVES:The purpose of this study is to determine the biomechanical properties of the bicortical off-axis screw fixation for stabilizing of Pauwels III femoral neck fractures compared with other fixation methods. METHODS:Eighteen synthetic femurs (Sawbones Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA) were divided into three groups. The osteotomy was made vertically to mimic the Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture. Group A (n = 6) was fixed with traditional inverted triangle cannulated screws. Group B (n = 6) was fixed with a unicortical off-axis screw and two parallel cannulated screws. Group C (n = 6) was fixed with a bicortical off-axis screw and two parallel cannulated screws. Each group was tested with a nondestructive axial compression test at a 7° of valgus followed with 1000 cycles of cyclic loading test from 100 N to 1000 N. Finally, a destructive axial compression test was applied until catastrophic failure. RESULTS:The average axial stiffness from group A to group C was 856.5, 934, and 1340 N/mm, respectively. The average ultimate failure load from group A to group C was 2612.7, 2508.8, and 3706 N, respectively. Group C exhibited significantly greater axial stiffness and a higher ultimate failure load than the other two groups (P < 0.05). Regarding the interfragmental displacement, the values from group A to group C were 0.41, 0.83, 0.36, respectively, and group B exhibited significantly larger fracture gap formation after the cyclic loading test. CONCLUSIONS:The results of this biomechanical study show statistically significant increases in axial stiffness and ultimate failure load for the off-axis screw placed in bicortical fashion. Once the off-axis screw was positioned unicortically, the largest fracture diastasis was observed as compared to the other two methods.

To observe the biomechanical characteristics of bridge-link type combined internal fixation system (BCFS) with mixed-rod in the treatment of long segmental comminuted fracture of femoral shaft. A total of 16 models of long comminuted segment fracture of femoral shaft with mixed-rod and double-rod were made (8 each structure), and divided into the mixed-rod group and the double-rod group. The axial compression experiment and the radial torsion experiment were carried out on each of the mixed rod group and the double rod group. Four models were randomly selected from the two groups for axial compression experiment and radial torsion experiment, respectively. The changes of axial compression yield load and displacement, and also radial torsional yield load and angle were observed in two groups. At the same time, the maximum load was recorded when the curve had a break point or in a horizontal state, and then calculated the yield load. The data of normal distribution were compared with one-sample test. When the two groups were compressed axially at the same speed, as the axial compression yield load increased gradually, the longitudinal compression displacement of the mixed-rod group was obviously smaller than that in the double-rod group; and the maximum axial compression yield load of the mixed-rod group was greater than that in the double-rod group ((7 517±4)N vs (2 290±4) N, 1 848.071, 0.000). When the two groups were twisted radially at the same speed,as radial torsional yield load increased gradually, the radial torsion angle of the mixed-rod group was smaller than that in the double-rod group; and the maximum radial torsional yield load of the mixed-rod group was greater than that in the double-rod group ((61.3±2.0) Nm vs (24.4±2.2)Nm, 25.201, 0.000). For the long segment comminuted fracture of femoral shaft, the mixed-rod of BCFS can fix fracture more strongly than double-rod in longitudinal direction and maintain the stability of fracture end. The transverse torsion resistance is better than that of the double-rod, and the fatigue resistance is strong.