The oncogenic potential of endometrial polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lee Stephanie Cruz,Kaunitz Andrew M,Sanchez-Ramos Luis,Rhatigan Ronald M
Obstetrics and gynecology
OBJECTIVE:To systematically review and summarize the medical literature regarding the association of menopausal status, uterine bleeding, and polyp size and risk of malignancy among women undergoing polyp resection. DATA SOURCES:We supplemented a search of entries in electronic databases with references cited in original studies and review articles to identify studies assessing the risk of malignancy for patients undergoing polypectomy. Key word searches were performed using the words "endometrial polyp," "malignancy," "ultrasound," "saline sonohysterography," "hysteroscopy," and "histopathology." METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION:We evaluated abstracted data and performed quantitative analyses in observational studies assessing the effects of menopausal status, vaginal bleeding, and polyp size on the risk of malignancy in patients undergoing polyp resection (n=1,552). For each study with binary outcomes, relative risks with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Estimates of relative risk were calculated using fixed and random-effects models. Homogeneity was tested across the studies. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the effects of individual studies on the overall effect estimates. Publication bias was assessed using Egger test. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS:Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria for this review. Among women found to have endometrial polyps, the prevalence of premalignant or malignant polyps was 5.42% (214 of 3,946) in postmenopausal women compared with 1.7% (68 of 3,997) in reproductive-aged women (relative risk 3.86; 95% CI 2.92-5.11). The prevalence of endometrial neoplasia within polyps in women with symptomatic bleeding was 4.15% (195 of 4,697) compared with 2.16% (85 of 3,941) for those without bleeding (relative risk 1.97; 95% CI 1.24-3.14). Among symptomatic postmenopausal women with endometrial polyps, 4.47% (88 of 1,968) had a malignant polyp in comparison to 1.51% (25 of 1,654) asymptomatic postmenopausal women (relative risk 3.36; 95% CI 1.45-7.80). CONCLUSION:Based on data from observational studies, both symptomatic vaginal bleeding and postmenopausal status in women with endometrial polyps are associated with an increased risk of endometrial malignancy.
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f74864
The clinical significance of small endometrial polyps.
Hamani Yaron,Eldar Ido,Sela Hen Y,Voss Ernst,Haimov-Kochman Ronit
European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
OBJECTIVE:Small endometrial polyps are relatively common in asymptomatic women and may regress spontaneously. In symptomatic women, the finding of a small polyp (<1cm diameter) raises the question of the clinical pertinence and necessity of excision. Sparse data are available on the effectiveness of hysteroscopic excision of small polyps to manage abnormal uterine bleeding. The aim of this study was to assess outcome after hysteroscopic excision of small endometrial polyps in symptomatic patients. STUDY DESIGN:This was an observational cohort study enrolling 255 premenopausal women presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding and a small endometrial polyp on office hysteroscopy, undertaken between January 2004 and February 2007. The study group was referred for polypectomy by operative hysteroscopy. The outcome of the procedure was reviewed 6-12 months later by a telephone interview to assess the pattern of uterine bleeding after the procedure and overall satisfaction. RESULTS:Significant improvement in the magnitude of bleeding was experienced by 70% of participants, but only 30% of them reported return to regular menses. Satisfaction with the procedure was reported by 80%. Younger patients reported a less favorable bleeding pattern and were found to be less satisfied with the outcome of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS:Symptomatic women with small endometrial polyps can be treated safely and efficiently with hysteroscopic excision. In the younger age group of patients, however, the outcome of the procedure may be less favorable and may necessitate the addition of endometrial ablation to improve outcome and increase patient satisfaction.
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.07.011
The risk of malignancy in uterine polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
BACKGROUND:Endometrial polyps are a common condition. The risk of malignancy has often led to an overtreatment with high health care costs and huge psychological distress. OBJECTIVE:We conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis in order to estimate the prevalence of premalignant and malignant lesions in women undergoing hysteroscopic polypectomy. DATA SOURCE:We developed the search using PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify papers published between 2000- January 2019. The research strategy used on Pubmed was: ("polyps" (MESH) OR "endometrial polyp*") AND ("malignancy" OR "cancer" OR "histopathology" OR "hysteroscopy" OR "ultrasound", OR "sonohysterography"). The same search was modified for EMBASE. STUDY ELIGIBILITY:We included all observational retrospective and prospective studies and studies were selected for the review if they met following inclusion criteria: pre-operative diagnosis of benign-looking endometrial polyps at ultrasound examination or at hysteroscopy, excision of endometrial polyps via surgical hysteroscopy, histopathological diagnosis of benign polyps, or hyperplasia without atypia, or premalignancy (atypical hyperplasia) or malignancy (endometrial cancer). Moreover, studies were included if number or percentage of subjects with and without malignancy was provided and if they reported data about menopausal and/or bleeding status. We excluded data presented exclusively as abstracts in national and international meetings, or case report or review articles that did not include original data and papers published in other than English language. Our primary outcome was the prevalence of endometrial premalignant or malignant polyps in the total series, among premenopausal and postmenopausal women and among women with or without abnormal bleeding and then in subgroup analysis according to study design, diagnostic method, study region and calendar year of publication. RESULTS:A total of 51 studies reporting data on 35,345 women were included in this review. The prevalence of malignant polyps was 2.73% (95% CI 2.57-2.91) with very high heterogeneity among studies. The rates were lower for premenopausal women (1.12%) than post-menopausal ones (4.93%) and the difference was statistically significant (chi-square = 397.21. p < .0001). The risk of malignancy was higher among symptomatic (5.14%) than asymptomatic ones (1.89%) (chi-square = 133.13 p < .001). We observed higher rate of malignant polyps in prospective studies. In the meta-analysis selecting 10 prospective studies the random pooled estimate was 5.88 (95% CI: 4.06-7.97) with heterogeneity among studies (heterogeneity chi square = 17.55 P = .025) whereas in retrospective studies the random pooled estimate was 2.94 (95% CI:2.24-3.71) with high heterogeneity among studies (P < .001). This finding can be due to more strict diagnostic criteria in prospective studies. CONCLUSION:Symptomatic vaginal bleeding and postmenopausal status in women with endometrial polyps increased the risk of malignancy. This finding could be an useful evidence to select patients who need to undergo hysteroscopic resection of endometrial polyps and women to whom, instead, an expectant management can be offer.
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.04.009
Diagnosis and management of endometrial polyps: a critical review of the literature.
Salim S,Won H,Nesbitt-Hawes E,Campbell N,Abbott J
Journal of minimally invasive gynecology
This review article summarizes the salient literature on the diagnosis and management of endometrial polyps. Electronic resources including Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library (including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), Current Contents, and EMBASE were searched with the MeSH terms including all subheadings and keywords endometrial polyps, abnormal uterine bleeding, polypectomy, polyp management, polyp and diagnosis, and polyp and malignancy. There is a paucity of level I evidence in the literature on the diagnosis and management of this common gynecologic disease. Noninvasive investigations such as transvaginal ultrasonography, with or without the use of 3-dimensional ultrasonography and contrast techniques remain the mainstay of first-line investigation. Hysteroscopic resection is the most effective management for endometrial polyps and allows histologic assessment, whereas blind biopsy or curettage has low diagnostic accuracy and should not be performed. This article will review the cause, epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic investigations, and management of endometrial polyps.
10.1016/j.jmig.2011.05.018
Endometrial Polyps and Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (AUB-P): What is the relationship, how are they diagnosed and how are they treated?
Clark T Justin,Stevenson Helen
Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology
The diagnosis and treatment of endometrial polyps will be familiar to most gynaecologists. However, the aetiology and natural history of these focal intrauterine lesions are yet to be elucidated. This lack of clarity is also true with regard to their clinical significance; whilst endometrial polyps are highly prevalent in all types of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), they are also commonly found in women without AUB. These controversies will be discussed along with current thoughts on the diagnosis and treatment of endometrial polyps. Criteria for diagnosis of uterine polyps vary according to the test used, but optimal testing is not yet solidified. Recent data from randomised trials evaluating new and established surgical technologies as well as comparing treatment protocols and settings will be examined.
10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.09.005
Role of Hormones in Common Benign Uterine Lesions: Endometrial Polyps, Leiomyomas, and Adenomyosis.
Kossaï Myriam,Penault-Llorca Frédérique
Advances in experimental medicine and biology
Leiomyoma, adenomyosis, and endometrial polyps are benign uterine disorders which seem to develop in the context of hormonal imbalances, due to steroid hormones, estrogen and progesterone, in association with various factors ranging from genetic factors to modifiable lifestyle factors. A growing body of evidence suggests that those hormones and their receptors are key modulators in the genesis and the growth of those pathologic entities. Further studies are required to understand their involvement in the pathogenesis of those lesions and their link to other factors such as extracellular matrix components, growth factors, chemokines, cytokines, and tissue repair mechanisms.
10.1007/978-3-030-38474-6_3