Screening, evaluation, and management of cancer-related fatigue: Ready for implementation to practice? Berger Ann M,Mitchell Sandra A,Jacobsen Paul B,Pirl William F CA: a cancer journal for clinicians Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Evidence regarding cancer-related fatigue (fatigue) has accumulated sufficiently such that recommendations for screening, evaluation, and/or management have been released recently by 4 leading cancer organizations. These evidence-based fatigue recommendations are available for clinicians, and some have patient versions; but barriers at the patient, clinician, and system levels hinder dissemination and implementation into practice. The underlying biologic mechanisms for this debilitating symptom have not been elucidated completely, hindering the development of mechanistically driven interventions. However, significant progress has been made toward methods for screening and comprehensively evaluating fatigue and other common symptoms using reliable and valid self-report measures. Limited data exist to support the use of any pharmacologic agent; however, several nonpharmacologic interventions have been shown to be effective in reducing fatigue in adults. Never before have evidence-based recommendations for fatigue management been disseminated by 4 premier cancer organizations (the National Comprehensive Cancer, the Oncology Nursing Society, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer/Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology). Clinicians may ask: Are we ready for implementation into practice? The reply: A variety of approaches to screening, evaluation, and management are ready for implementation. To reduce fatigue severity and distress and its impact on functioning, intensified collaborations and close partnerships between clinicians and researchers are needed, with an emphasis on system-wide efforts to disseminate and implement these evidence-based recommendations. 10.3322/caac.21268

Cancer-related fatigue in patients with and survivors of Hodgkin's lymphoma: a longitudinal study of the German Hodgkin Study Group. Kreissl Stefanie,Mueller Horst,Goergen Helen,Mayer Axel,Brillant Corinne,Behringer Karolin,Halbsguth Teresa Veronika,Hitz Felicitas,Soekler Martin,Shonukan Oluwatoyin,Rueffer Jens Ulrich,Flechtner Hans-Henning,Fuchs Michael,Diehl Volker,Engert Andreas,Borchmann Peter, The Lancet. Oncology BACKGROUND:Patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma might have persistent fatigue even years after treatment. However, knowledge of the development of fatigue persisting long after completion of treatment is limited. Therefore, we did a detailed analysis of fatigue in our first-line clinical trials for early-stage favourable (HD13 trial), early-stage unfavourable (HD14 trial), and advanced-stage (HD15 trial) Hodgkin's lymphoma. Beyond the description of fatigue from diagnosis up to 5 years after treatment, we aimed to assess any effect of patient characteristics, disease characteristics, or treatment characteristics on persistent fatigue. METHODS:In this longitudinal study, we included patients with early-stage favourable, early-stage unfavourable, and advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma from the HD13, HD14, and HD15 trials, respectively, aged between 18 and 60 years. Eligible patients for these trials had newly diagnosed, histologically proven Hodgkin's lymphoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, HIV negativity, and absence of comorbidity disallowing protocol treatment. We used the fatigue scale of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire to assess fatigue from diagnosis up to 5 years after the end of treatment. The primary outcomes of interest in this study were fatigue scores in the second and fifth year after end of treatment. We estimated the effect of different disease, patient, and treatment characteristics on fatigue with multiple regression analyses and identified fatigue trajectories with growth mixture models. The regression analyses and growth mixture models used robust and full information maximum likelihood estimates to account for missing data. The HD13, HD14, and HD15 trials are registered as international standard randomised controlled trials, ISRCTN63474366, ISRCTN04761296, and ISRCTN32443041, respectively. FINDINGS:The HD13 trial enrolled patients with early-stage favourable disease from Jan 28, 2003, to Sept 30, 2009; the HD14 trial enrolled patients with early-stage unfavourable disease from Jan 28, 2003, to Dec 23, 2009; and the HD15 trial enrolled patients with advanced-stage disease from Jan 28, 2003, to April 18, 2008. 5306 patients were enrolled in these trials. We analysed 4215 patients with any valid fatigue assessment up to 5 years after the end of treatment. Patients with higher tumour burden at diagnosis had more fatigue at baseline (mean fatigue score in HD13: 30·8 [SD 28·0]; in HD14: 39·8 [29·4], and in HD15: 49·0 [30·2]). Fatigue scores (FA) in the second year after the end of treatment were 28·5 (24·7) in HD13, 28·8 (24·4) in HD14, and 30·7 (24·4) in HD15; in the fifth year after the end of treatment FA was 30·8 (26·0) in HD13, 27·1 (24·8) in HD14, and 28·2 (24·9) in HD15. Predictors of fatigue in the second and fifth year after end of treatment were baseline fatigue (p<0·0001) and age as a continuous variable (p<0·0001). In addition to preceding fatigue and age, patient sex and Hodgkin's lymphoma specific risk factors at baseline did not consistently and significantly improve the prognosis of fatigue in the first, second, and fifth year after end of treatment. There was no significant effect of treatment on fatigue scores in the second and fifth year after treatment. INTERPRETATION:Our findings show a high incidence of severe acute and persistent fatigue in Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors, which is largely independent of tumour stage and treatment. Our results contribute to a better understanding of fatigue in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors and could inform development of urgently needed intervention strategies. FUNDING:Deutsche Krebshilfe. 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30093-6

Prognostic value of self-reported fatigue on overall survival in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: a multicentre, prospective, observational, cohort study. Efficace Fabio,Gaidano Gianluca,Breccia Massimo,Voso Maria Teresa,Cottone Francesco,Angelucci Emanuele,Caocci Giovanni,Stauder Reinhard,Selleslag Dominik,Sprangers Mirjam,Platzbecker Uwe,Ricco Alessandra,Sanpaolo Grazia,Beyne-Rauzy Odile,Buccisano Francesco,Palumbo Giuseppe A,Bowen David,Nguyen Khanh,Niscola Pasquale,Vignetti Marco,Mandelli Franco The Lancet. Oncology BACKGROUND:The clinical presentation of myelodysplastic syndromes is highly variable and so accurate prediction of outcomes in these patients is crucial. We aimed to assess whether self-reported fatigue severity predicts overall survival beyond gold-standard prognostic indices in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. METHODS:We did a multicentre, prospective, observational, cohort study of patients from 37 centres in Europe, USA, and east Asia. Adults (≥18 years) with myelodysplastic syndromes were consecutively enrolled within 6 months of diagnosis with an intermediate-2-risk or high-risk score according to the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS). Patients were enrolled irrespective of older age, comorbidities, performance status, and progression from a lower IPSS risk score category. All patients had to complete a quality of life assessment at baseline. With use of univariate and then multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, we constructed a multivariate model of how prognostic variables, including IPSS and fatigue score from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life questionnaire-core 30, predicted overall survival. The primary endpoint was overall survival by baseline self-reported fatigue scale ratings. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00809575. FINDINGS:Between Nov 10, 2008, and Aug 13, 2012, we enrolled 280 patients with a median age of 71 years (IQR 64-77). The median follow-up was 15 months (IQR 8-27), and the last patient was assessed Feb 16, 2015. The median overall survival from diagnosis was 17 months (95% CI 15-19). In univariate analysis, the baseline factors that were significantly associated with reduced overall survival were increasing age, transfusion dependency (defined as having received at least one red blood cell transfusion every 8 weeks over a period of 4 months), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of two or more, increased white blood cell count, high-risk IPSS score, and higher self-reported fatigue severity. In multivariate analysis, baseline factors independently associated with reduced overall survival were high-risk IPSS score (hazard ratio [HR] 2·525, 95% CI 1·357-4·697; p=0·0035) and a higher score for fatigue (1·110, 1·040-1·170, for every ten points of fatigue deterioration; p=0·0007). In further multivariate models for survival, including either the WHO-based prognostic scoring system or the revised version of the IPSS classification, fatigue remained a statistically significant independent prognostic factor with a HR of 1·120 (1·050-1·180, p=0.0003) and a HR of 1·130 (1·060-1·190, p=0·0002), respectively. INTERPRETATION:In patients with newly diagnosed higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, self-reported fatigue severity provides prognostic information for survival independent from gold-standard risk classifications. Our findings suggest that fatigue assessment should be included in routine diagnostic investigation for these patients and considered as a standard baseline stratification factor in future randomised controlled trials. FUNDING:Associazione Italiana contro le Leucemie, Linfomi e Mieloma (AIL). 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00206-5