Great saphenous vein stump: a risk factor for superficial/deep venous thrombosis and an indication for prophylactic anticoagulation? - a retrospective analysis.
Khan Yasir,Cheema Muhammad Arslan,Abdullah Hafez Mohammad Ammar,Sattar Yasar,Haq Shujaul,Balaratna Asoka,Cheema Khadija,Ullah Waqas
Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives
: Great saphenous vein (GSV) grafts are used for coronary artery bypass surgeries, but the remaining stump of the GSV may be the nidus for superficial and deep vein thrombosis. This study aims to determine the risk of thrombosis in the GSV stump in patients who developed lower extremity swelling following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). : We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis at Abington Jefferson Hospital of 100 patients who underwent CABG with GSV. Patients were monitored via follow-up for seven days for the development of saphenous vein thrombosis without any prophylactic anticoagulation for venous thrombosis. Risk factors including age, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, familial thrombophilia's, family history of thrombosis, malignancy, and confounding factor-like early mobilization that may potentially alter the results were recorded. : The mean age of included patients was 70 years, and 65% of participants were men, 35% were women. Fourteen percent of the patients developed pain, swelling and edema in a leg where the graft was taken. We included patients aged >50 years with coronary artery disease who underwent CABG with SVG and developed lower extremity symptoms concerning for thrombosis. These patients underwent duplex ultrasound for possible GSV stump thrombosis. Any patients with coronary artery disease but no CABG or no lower extremity edema were excluded from the study. We found no saphenous vein thrombosis in the stump of the GSV in patients with clinical symptoms of thrombosis in their lower extremities based on duplex imaging. : Based on our findings, the postoperative risk of developing thrombosis at the GSV stump and its extension to the deep veins is low and does not warrant prophylactic anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism. However, we recommend that further prospective studies with larger samples for an extended duration are warranted for better assessment of the risk of venous thrombosis in the GSV stump with minimal confounding factors.
10.1080/20009666.2019.1655626
A Retrospective Comparison of Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis versus Pharmacomechanical Thrombolysis for Treatment of Acute Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis.
Tian Yu,Huang Zhiyong,Luo Kunhui,Zhang Ning,Yuan Biao
Annals of vascular surgery
BACKGROUND:Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (PMT) and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) are frequently employed for treating deep venous thrombosis (DVT). However, there have been relatively few studies comparing PMT outcomes to those associated with CDT. The present study was thus designed to compare short- and mid-term PMT and CDT patient outcomes following the treatment of DVT of the lower extremities. METHODS:This study was a retrospective analysis of 98 patients treated at the 3rd Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Shenzhen, China) and Beijing Chao Yang Hospital (Beijing, China). All patients had undergone treatment for symptomatic DVT of the lower legs via either CDT or PMT. Clinical records and outcome data between the patients in these 2 treatment groups were compared. RESULTS:Of the 98 patients analyzed in this retrospective study, 50 had been treated via CDT while 48 had undergone PMT. These PMT and CDT operations were associated with mean treatment durations of 0.97 ± 0.20 hr and 32.48 ± 7.46 hr, respectively (P < 0.0001). Complete lysis was achieved in 78 patients (42 and 36 in the PMT and CDT groups, respectively P = 0.057), while effective lysis was achieved in 96 patients (48 and 48 in the PMT and CDT groups, respectively P = 0.162), with lysis being ineffective in the 2 remaining patients. PMT was associated with a significantly decreased length of hospital stay, usage of UK dose, and treatment duration relative to CDT(P < 0.0001). No major complications or MACE incidence were noted in either group, although 18 patients in the PMT group suffered from bradyarrhythmia (P = 0.007). Clinical efficacy was achieved in 96 patients (48 in each treatment group) at time of discharge (P = 0.162). A Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that 2-year primary patency rates did not differ significantly between these 2 groups (P = 0.442). CONCLUSION:PMT is an effective treatment modality in patients with symptomatic DVT. Relative to CDT it is associated with high treatment success rates, reduced treatment duration, and reduced hospitalization duration, although it is also associated with higher rates of systemic complications.
10.1016/j.avsg.2020.12.024
[Catheter directed thrombolysis for early left lower extremity deep venous thrombosis without vena cava filters protection].
Xiao Le,Gong Kun-mei,Wang Kun-hua,Lü Yan-jiao,Chen Zhi-song,Ouyang Yi-ming,Ling Ping,Long Ya-xin,Li Lin-hai
Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery]
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the indications, safety and efficacy of catheter directed thrombolysis for early left lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) without vena cava filters protection. METHODS:Clinical data of 54 cases of early left lower extremity DVT received catheter directed thrombolysis without vena cava filters from July 2008 to June 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. The thrombosis was entire without free floating clots and no thrombosis in vena cava detected with ultrasound scan. Twenty-five patients were male and 29 were female with the average age of 52.8 years. Fifty-one of which were iliofemoral and popliteal, the other 3 were iliofemoral. The course were ≤ 7 d in 45 cases and these were 8 to 30 d in 9 cases. Urokinase of 300 000 U was infused through catheters per 2 h twice a day. Meanwhile 4000 U of low weight heparin was administered subcutaneously per 12 h, or heparin infusion at dosage of 18 U×kg(-1)×h(-1). RESULTS:The procedure technically succeeded in all patients. In total cases venous score decreased to 4.6 ± 2.1 post 6 to 10 d of thrombolysis from 10.8 ± 1.0 with thrombolysis rate of 58% ± 18% which was not significantly different between groups of ≤ 7 d and 8 to 30 d (t = 1.02, P = 0.34). On 14(th) day, 11 patients (20.4%) completely recovered, 35 cases (64.8%) experienced large improvement, 8 patients (14.8%) had mild improvement and nobody was failed, resulting in total efficacy of 100%. No patient developed clinical symptomatic pulmonary embolism. SpO2 did not alter markedly post thrombolysis [(91.0 ± 2.6)% vs. (90.8 ± 2.4)%, t = 2.03, P = 0.05]. No patients suffered from cerebral hemorrhage and haemoturia, and catheter induced inflammation occurred in 4 cases (7.41%). There was mild bleeding in puncture sites in 11 patients (20.4%) during the course. There were 36 patients (66.7%) had been followed up with the time of 6 to 21 months. In which 31 cases had no lower extremity edema or had mild edema after activities. Two patients developed serious edema after activities for deep venous insufficiency. Three cases combined with malignant tumor or renal failure recurred. CONCLUSIONS:For early left extremity DVT which is entire without free floating clots and no thrombosis in vena cava, catheter directed thrombolysis without filter protection maybe administered with safety, efficiency and lower expense.
Comparison of the recanalization rate and postthrombotic syndrome in patients with deep venous thrombosis treated with rivaroxaban or warfarin.
de Athayde Soares Rafael,Matielo Marcelo Fernando,Brochado Neto Francisco Cardoso,Nogueira Mônica Paschoal,Almeida Rogério Duque,Sacilotto Roberto
Surgery
BACKGROUND:In this article, we report the outcomes of patients with deep venous thrombosis in the lower limbs treated with the oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban or warfarin, focusing on the recanalization rate (measured with duplex ultrasound) and the incidence of postthrombotic syndrome. METHODS:This was a prospective, consecutive, randomized, blind cohort study of patients admitted with deep venous thrombosis to the Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual, São Paulo, Brazil, between March 2016 and July 2018. The patients were randomized into 2 groups and treated with oral anticoagulation for 6 months: either rivaroxaban (group 1) or warfarin (group 2). The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov under NCT 02704598. RESULTS:Eighty-eight patients with deep venous thrombosis were admitted to the Vascular Surgery Department and randomized into the 2 groups. The follow-up time was 360 days. Analyses were performed at 180 and 360 days. Four patients were excluded from the study during follow-up because of a diagnosis of ovarian cancer (1 patient), head and neck cancer (1 patient), lung cancer (1 patient), and stomach cancer (1 patient). Therefore, 84 patients were evaluated: 46 patients in group 1 and 38 in group 2. The incidence of postthrombotic syndrome was 17.9% (15 cases) in the total cohort, but was significantly higher in group 2 (11 cases, 28.9%) than in group 1 (4 cases, 8.7%; P < .001; odds ratio, 4.278). The rate of total venous recanalization at 360 days was 40.5% (34 patients) in the total cohort, but was significantly higher in group 1 (35 patients, 76.1%) than in group 2 (5 patients, 13.2%; P < .001). The incidence of partial venous recanalization was 46.4% and was significantly higher in group 2 (28 patients, 73.7%) than in group 1 (11 patients, 23.9%; P = .016). Five patients in the total cohort (6%) showed no venous recanalization, all of them in group 2 (P = .016). CONCLUSION:In this study, patients who received oral rivaroxaban displayed a lower incidence of postthrombotic syndrome and a better total vein recanalization rate after 6 and 12 months than patients who received warfarin.
10.1016/j.surg.2019.05.030
Thromboembolic Risk of Endovascular Intervention for Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis.
Lindsey Philip,Echeverria Angela,Poi Mun J,Matos Jesus,Bechara Carlos F,Cheung Mathew,Lin Peter H
Annals of vascular surgery
BACKGROUND:This study evaluated the risk of thromboembolism during endovascular interventions in patients with symptomatic lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) METHODS: Clinical records of all patients who underwent endovascular interventions for symptomatic lower extremity DVT from 2001 to 2017 were retrospectively analyzed using a prospectively maintained database. Only patients who received an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter were included in the analysis. Trapped intrafilter thrombus was assessed for procedure-related thromboembolism. Clinical outcomes of thrombus management and thromboembolism risk were analyzed. RESULTS:A total 172 patients (mean age 57.4 years, 98 females) who underwent 174 endovascular DVT interventions were included in the analysis. Treatment strategies included thrombolytic therapy (64%), mechanical thrombectomy (n = 86%), pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (51%), balloon angioplasty (98%), and stent placement (28%). Thrombectomy device used included AngioJet (56%), Trellis (19%), and Aspire (11%). Trapped IVC filter thrombus was identified in 58 patients (38%) based on the IVC venogram. No patient developed clinically evident pulmonary embolism (PE). IVC filter retrieval was performed in 98 patients (56%, mean 11.8 months after implantation). Multivariate analysis showed that iliac vein occlusion (P = 0.04) was predictive for procedure-related thromboembolism. CONCLUSIONS:Iliac vein thrombotic occlusion is associated with an increased thromboembolic risk in DVT intervention. Retrievable IVC filter should be considered when performing percutaneous thrombectomy in patients with iliac venous occlusion to prevent PE.
10.1016/j.avsg.2017.10.004
Cardiovascular Disease: Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis.
Braun Michael,Kassop David
FP essentials
Risk factors for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) include immobility, recent or current hospitalization, recent surgery, recent infection, and cancer. Patients with suspected venous thromboembolism should be evaluated with the Wells score or modified Wells score (which adds a previous DVT) to determine the likelihood of DVT. A low or moderate probability score and a normal D-dimer test result exclude DVT. If the score indicates that DVT is likely, patients should undergo Doppler ultrasonography (US). If US reveals DVT in a proximal (ie, in the knee or above) vein, anticoagulation should be started unless contraindicated. If the DVT is distal (ie, below the knee), patients can be started on anticoagulation or monitored with repeat US and started on anticoagulation if the clot extends proximally. For anticoagulation, direct oral anticoagulants are recommended for most patients except pregnant women, for whom heparins are recommended. The treatment duration is at least 3 months, and longer if risk factors persist. Indefinite therapy may be required for patients with irreversible risk factors or inherited coagulation disorders. Other treatments, such as thrombectomy, thrombolytics, and vena cava filters, are used for select patients. Evaluation should include consideration of testing for occult cancer.
Acute Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis: The Data, Where We Are, and How It Is Done.
Ramaswamy Raja S,Akinwande Olaguoke,Giardina Joseph D,Kavali Pavan K,Marks Christina G
Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology
The incidence of venous thromboembolism, including both deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is estimated at 300,000-600,000 per year. Although thrombosis may occur anywhere, it is thrombosis of the deep veins of the lower extremities that is of interest as this is where thrombosis occurs most often within the venous system. This article discusses the evaluation and interventions, including endovascular catheter-direct treatments, for patients with acute deep venous thrombosis.
10.1053/j.tvir.2018.03.006
Relationship between the site of thrombosis and the prevalence of pulmonary embolism in acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis.
Zhang Chengwei,Li Qiao,Yu Hang,Wang Fang,Lin Ziyi,Yin Weiwei,Pan Yijia,Wu Mengqi,Xie Weidong,Chen Xuehai,Liu Naxin
Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders
OBJECTIVE:Lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (LEDVT) is common and can lead to pulmonary embolism (PE). Currently, the mechanism of how LEDVT causes PE is unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between the thrombus sites and PE in LEDVT patients. METHODS:A retrospective study that included the medical data of 3101 patients aged >18 years who were diagnosed with LEDVT by duplex ultrasound was performed at The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from 2008 to 2017. The clinical information of the patients was collected. According to the thrombosis sites, the patients were divided into three groups. We determined the cumulative prevalence and prevalence rate of PE between the groups and used Cox proportional hazard regression models, which were stratified on matched sets, to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) for all of the outcomes of interest. We focused on the relationship of proximal or isolated distal LEDVT with PE and also analyzed the relationship of the left side or right side of LEDVT with PE. RESULTS:A total of 1629 (52.5%) patients had left LEDVT (group 1), 912 (29.4%) patients had right LEDVT (group 2), and 560 (18.1%) patients had bilateral LEDVT (group 3). The rate of PE was higher in group 2 than in group 1, although there were more patients suffering from LEDVT in group 1 than in group 2 (P < .001). The patients with proximal LEDVT in group 3 exhibited a greater risk of PE compared with those with isolated distal LEDVT (adjusted HR, 2.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-5.49). We also observed that the proportion of patients with proximal LEDVT who were receiving treatment was much higher than that of patients with distal LEDVT (P < .05). The patients with right LEDVT had a higher risk of PE than the patients with left LEDVT (adjusted HR, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-2.21), and the patients with right LEDVT had more comorbidities, such as malignant neoplasms, hypertension, and diabetes (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with proximal bilateral LEDVT had a higher likelihood for development of PE than did patients with distal LEDVT, which may be associated with inadequate therapy for proximal bilateral LEDVT. PE was more likely to develop with right-sided LEDVT because these patients had more comorbidities in our study.
10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.11.010