Tipping the balance: toward rational combination therapies to overcome venetoclax resistance in mantle cell lymphoma.
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), an aggressive, but incurable B-cell lymphoma, is genetically characterized by the t(11;14) translocation, resulting in the overexpression of Cyclin D1. In addition, deregulation of the B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) family proteins BCL-2, B-cell lymphoma-extra large (BCL-X), and myeloid cell leukemia-1 (MCL-1) is highly common in MCL. This renders these BCL-2 family members attractive targets for therapy; indeed, the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (ABT-199), which already received FDA approval for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), shows promising results in early clinical trials for MCL. However, a significant subset of patients show primary resistance or will develop resistance upon prolonged treatment. Here, we describe the underlying mechanisms of venetoclax resistance in MCL, such as upregulation of BCL-X or MCL-1, and the recent (clinical) progress in the development of inhibitors for these BCL-2 family members, followed by the transcriptional and (post-)translational (dys)regulation of the BCL-2 family proteins, including the role of the lymphoid organ microenvironment. Based upon these insights, we discuss how rational combinations of venetoclax with other therapies can be exploited to prevent or overcome venetoclax resistance and improve MCL patient outcome.
Single-cell multiomics reveal the scale of multi-layered adaptations enabling CLL relapse during venetoclax therapy.
Venetoclax inhibits the pro-survival protein BCL2 to induce apoptosis and is a standard therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), delivering high complete remission rates and prolonged progression-free survival in relapsed CLL, but with eventual loss of efficacy. A spectrum of sub-clonal genetic changes associated with venetoclax resistance have now been described. To fully understand clinical resistance to venetoclax, we combined single-cell short- and long‑read RNA‑sequencing to reveal the previously unappreciated scale of genetic and epigenetic changes underpinning acquired venetoclax resistance. These appear to be multi-layered. One layer comprises changes in the BCL2 family of apoptosis regulators, especially the pro-survival family members. This includes previously described mutations in BCL2 and amplification of the MCL1 gene but heterogeneous across and within individual patient's leukemias. Changes in the pro-apoptotic genes are notably uncommon, except for single cases with sub-clonal losses of BAX or NOXA. Much more prominent was universal MCL1 gene upregulation. This was driven by an overlying layer of emergent NF‑kB activation which persisted in circulating cells during venetoclax therapy. We discovered that MCL1 could be a direct transcriptional target of NF‑kB. Both the switch to alternative pro-survival factors and NF‑kB activation largely dissipate following venetoclax discontinuation. Our studies reveal the extent of plasticity of CLL cells in their ability to evade venetoclax-induced apoptosis. Importantly, these findings pinpoint new approaches to circumvent venetoclax resistance and provide a specific biological justification for the strategy of venetoclax discontinuation once maximal response is achieved rather than maintaining long-term selective pressure with the drug.