Prenatal Invasive Testing at a Tertiary Referral Center in India: A Report of 433 Cases Under a Single Operator.
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:Chromosomal aneuploidies are major causes of perinatal death and childhood handicap. Awareness about screening and prenatal diagnosis for these disorders among obstetricians and primary care physicians is increasing. Since invasive tests like amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS) are associated with a risk of miscarriage these tests should be carried out judiciously in pregnancies considered to be at high risk for aneuploidies and other genetic disorders. The purpose of our study was to examine the patterns, trends and outcomes of the various screening procedures and invasive tests results. METHODOLOGY:Retrospective observational study done over a period of 3 years and one month including 433 pregnant women with high risk for genetic disorders undergoing invasive prenatal testing like chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis or cordocentesis. Data were collected from our department records regarding the maternal age, indication for invasive testing, past obstetric history, family history of genetic syndromes, ultrasound findings in the current sonographic examination and the results of the tests done. Any immediate or late complications of the procedure if any were telephonically addressed. RESULTS:A total of 436 procedures on 433 patients (418 singleton,12 single fetus of twin, 3 both fetuses of twins) were done out of which 281 were amniocentesis(64.4%), 153 were chorionic villus sampling (35.1%) and 2 were cordocentesis(< 1%). Of the 436 procedures, 373(85.5%) were done for positive screening tests for chromosomal aneuploidies and 63(14.4%) were done for previous history of genetic syndromes. The positive predictive value of biochemical marker alone was around 2.7% and higher around 13% for a combined first trimester or a second-trimester screen along with ultrasound abnormalities. The higher the biochemical risk does not translate into higher chance of chromosomal abnormality. Nineteen percentage of fetuses with NT above 95th centile had chromosomal abnormality. Twenty-one percentage of fetuses with absent nasal bone in our study had trisomy 21. CONCLUSION:Aneuploidy screening is the most common indication for prenatal invasive testing with dual marker combined with nuchal translucency, nasal bone, tricuspid regurgitation and ductus venosus flow providing the best detection rates. The chance of an affected fetus in a patient with aneuploidy screen positive overall is only 6.7%.
10.1007/s13224-021-01496-9
Prenatal diagnosis and management of fetal discordant alpha-thalassaemia in dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) twins.
BMJ case reports
A 29-year-old nulliparous woman with a dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) twin pregnancy was referred to our hospital at 16 weeks' gestation for prenatal diagnosis. She was diagnosed of Haemoglobin H Constant Spring (Hb H CS; --/αα) and her husband of alpha thalassemia-1 trait (--/αα). Detailed ultrasound showed that left twin had fetal anaemia and early signs of hydrops while the right one was normal. Both twins were female. Amniocentesis in each sac was performed for prenatal diagnosis of thalassemia after a proper counselling with the couple. DNA analysis confirmed that the left fetus was affected with haemoglobin Bart's hydrops fetalis (--/--) while the right one was alpha thalassemia-1 trait (--/αα). Selective feticide with intracardiac injection of KCl was successfully performed on the hydropic fetus. Identification of the affected fetus is crucial for selective termination. Family counselling about the procedure and complications is also necessary.
10.1136/bcr-2018-224362
Risk of fetal loss following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Di Mascio D,Khalil A,Rizzo G,Buca D,Liberati M,Martellucci C A,Flacco M E,Manzoli L,D'Antonio F
Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
OBJECTIVE:To assess the rate of fetal loss following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS) in twin pregnancy. METHODS:MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for studies reporting procedure-related complications following amniocentesis or CVS in twin pregnancy. The primary outcome was the rate of procedure-related fetal loss. The secondary outcomes were fetal loss occurring before 24 weeks of gestation and fetal loss occurring within 4 weeks after the procedure. Head-to-head meta-analyses were used to compare directly each outcome, between women undergoing amniocentesis and those not undergoing amniocentesis and between women undergoing CVS and those not undergoing CVS, and to compute pooled risk differences (RD) between women exposed and those not exposed to each invasive procedure. Additionally, meta-analyses of proportions were used to estimate the pooled rates of each of the three outcomes in women undergoing amniocentesis or CVS and in controls. RESULTS:Sixteen studies (3419 twin pregnancies undergoing and 2517 not undergoing an invasive procedure) were included. Head-to-head meta-analyses comparing directly twin pregnancies undergoing and those not undergoing amniocentesis showed a higher risk for overall fetal loss in those undergoing amniocentesis (odds ratio (OR), 1.46 (P = 0.04); RD, 0.013 (P = 0.04)), while there was no difference in the risk of either fetal loss before 24 weeks of gestation (OR, 1.59 (P = 0.06); RD, 0.010 (P = 0.11)) or fetal loss within 4 weeks after the procedure (OR, 1.38 (P = 0.3); RD, 0.003 (P = 0.8)). Overall, the pooled rate of fetal loss was 2.4% (95% CI, 1.4-3.6%) in twin pregnancies undergoing amniocentesis compared with 2.4% (95% CI, 0.9-4.6%) in those not undergoing amniocentesis. Head-to-head meta-analyses directly comparing twin pregnancies undergoing and those not undergoing CVS showed no significant difference in either overall fetal loss (OR, 1.61 (P = 0.5); RD, 0.003 (P = 0.8)) or fetal loss before 24 weeks of gestation (OR, 1.61 (P = 0.5); RD, 0.003 (P = 0.8)). Overall, the pooled rate of fetal loss was 2.0% (95% CI, 0.0-6.5%) in twin pregnancies undergoing CVS compared with 1.8% (95% CI, 0.3-4.2%) in those not undergoing CVS. CONCLUSION:The risk of fetal loss following amniocentesis and CVS in twins is lower than reported previously and the rate of fetal loss before 24 weeks of gestation, or within 4 weeks after the procedure, did not differ from the background risk in twin pregnancy not undergoing invasive prenatal testing. These data can guide prenatal counseling for twin pregnancies undergoing invasive procedures. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
10.1002/uog.22143
Obstetrical Outcomes of Amniocentesis or Chorionic Villus Sampling in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies.
Kim Mi Sun,Moon Myoung Jin,Kang Sukho,Jung Sang Hee,Chang Sung Woon,Ki Hyo Jin,Kim Bohye,Ahn Eunhee
Journal of Korean medical science
BACKGROUND:Under certain situations, women with twin pregnancies may be counseled to undergo invasive prenatal diagnostic testing. Chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis are the two generally performed invasive prenatal diagnostic tests. Studies comparing procedure-related fetal loss between first-trimester chorionic villus sampling and second-trimester amniocentesis in twin pregnancies are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the procedure-related fetal loss and the obstetrical outcomes of these two procedures, chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis in twin pregnancies. METHODS:The data from dichorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancies on which first-trimester chorionic villus sampling (n = 54) or second-trimester amniocentesis (n = 170) was performed between December 2006 and January 2017 in a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The procedure-related fetal loss was classified as loss of one or all fetuses within 4 weeks of procedure, and overall fetal loss was classified as loss of one or all fetuses during the gestation. The groups were compared with respect to the procedure-related and obstetrical outcomes. RESULTS:The difference in proportion of procedure-related fetal loss rate (1.9% for chorionic villus sampling vs. 1.8% for amniocentesis; = 1.000) and the overall fetal loss rate (7.4% for chorionic villus sampling vs. 4.7% for amniocentesis; = 0.489) between the two groups was not significant. The mean gestational ages at delivery were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION:Both the overall fetal loss rate and the procedure-related fetal loss rate of chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis in dichorionic twin pregnancies had no statistical significance. Both procedures can be safely used individually.
10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e142
Foetal loss after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis in twin pregnancies: A multicentre retrospective cohort study.
Prenatal diagnosis
OBJECTIVE:We aimed to determine foetal losses for DCDA and MCDA twins following transabdominal CVS or amniocentesis performed <22+ weeks. METHODS:Retrospective cohort study conducted in the UK and Belgium 01/01/00-01/06/20. Cases with unknown chorionicity, monochorionic complications or complex procedures were excluded. Uncomplicated DCDA and MCDA twins without invasive procedures were identified as controls. We reported foetal losses <24+ weeks and losses of genetically and structurally normal foetuses. RESULTS:Outcomes were compared for DCDA foetuses; 258 after CVS with 3406 controls, 406 after amniocentesis with 3390 controls plus MCDA foetuses, 98 after CVS with 1124 controls, and 160 after amniocentesis with 1122 controls. There were more losses <24+ weeks with both procedures in DCDA (CVS RR 5.54 95% CI 3.38-9.08, amniocentesis RR 2.36 95% CI 1.22-4.56) and MCDA twins (CVS RR 5.14 95% CI 2.51-10.54, amniocentesis RR 7.01 95% CI 3.86-12.74). Losses of normal foetuses were comparable to controls (DCDA CVS RR 0.39 95% CI 0.05-2.83, DCDA amniocentesis RR 1.16 95% CI 0.42-3.22, MCDA CVS RR 2.3 95% CI 0.71-7.56, and MCDA amniocentesis RR 1.93 95% CI 0.59-6.38). CONCLUSIONS:This study indicates increased foetal losses for DCDA and MCDA twins following CVS and amniocentesis with uncertain risk to normal foetuses.
10.1002/pd.6237
Amniocentesis in Twin Pregnancies: Risk Factors of Fetal Loss.
Journal of clinical medicine
This study aims to determine if second trimester amniocentesis in twin pregnancies provides a significant independent contribution in the prediction of miscarriage or fetal loss at any stage of pregnancy. This was a retrospective cohort study of women with twin gestations booked for routine prenatal care in four fetal medicine units in Poland in the years 2010-2020. The study population included: (1) twin pregnancies that underwent amniocentesis at 16-20 weeks' gestation; (2) twin pregnancies that did not require any further testing and were followed-up routinely. Univariable and multivariable regression analysis was used to define which maternal and pregnancy characteristics provided a significant independent contribution in the prediction of miscarriage and fetal loss at any stage of pregnancy. In the study period, 2645 twin pregnancies were eligible for analysis. There were 144 cases of miscarriage defined as fetal loss of one or both twins before 24 weeks and 40 cases of intrauterine death of one or both twins after 24 weeks. A total number of 162 twin pregnancies underwent amniocentesis at 16-20 weeks' gestation. The rate of miscarriage before 24 weeks and the rate of fetal loss at any stage of pregnancy in the group that underwent amniocentesis was 10.49% and 13.58%, respectively, compared to 5.11% and 6.52% that did not undergo amniocentesis. Multivariable regression analysis showed that factors providing a significant independent contribution in the prediction of miscarriage and fetal loss at any stage of pregnancy were monochorionicity (MC), large intertwin discordance in crown-rump length (CRL), low Pregnancy Related Plasma Protein (PAPP-A) MoM and nuchal translucency (NT) above 95th centile. Amniocentesis in twin pregnancies does not provide a significant contribution in the prediction of miscarriage or fetal loss at any stage of pregnancy.
10.3390/jcm11071937