A 67-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital because of frequent asthma attacks and refractory chronic rhinosinusitis. She was diagnosed with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) concomitant with eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS) on the basis of peripheral blood eosinophilia, precipitating antibodies against , elevated total serum IgE, pulmonary infiltration, central bronchiectasis, mucoid impaction, and bilateral rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, which showed remarkable eosinophil accumulation histologically, especially in the ethmoid sinuses. Treatment with mepolizumab, 100 mg every 4 weeks, was initiated for both the ABPA and ECRS. Consistent with the decrease in the peripheral eosinophil count, the asthma and rhinosinusitis symptoms were drastically ameliorated. Not only her airway symptoms but also her exercise tolerance and pulmonary function test results remarkably improved. Mepolizumab therapy enhanced the quality of life for this patient with intractable ABPA and ECRS.

BACKGROUND:Omalizumab is a valuable alternative treatment for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). The effectiveness and safety of this medication have not been confirmed. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of omalizumab for ABPA. METHODS:This study involved a retrospective chart review. The main indicators used were asthma control test (ACT) scores, lung function parameters, doses of corticosteroids, acute exacerbation, hospitalization rates, total serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels, and blood eosinophil counts. Related adverse events were also reviewed to evaluate the safety of omalizumab. RESULTS:Fourteen patients with ABPA were included, of whom 10 (71%) concurrently had allergic rhinitis (AR). There were improvements in the mean percentages of the forced vital capacity, percentages of the forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and ACT score after omalizumab administration (p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.01, respectively). After the initiation of omalizumab administration, the median corticosteroid dose, acute exacerbation rate, hospitalization rate, and mean blood eosinophil count decreased when compared with the baseline values (p < 0.05, p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively). A reduction in the total serum IgE level was observed in patients with ABPA without AR compared with that in patients with AR (p < 0.05). One patient reported a concurrent skin rash, which spontaneously resolved without medication. CONCLUSION:It is safe and effective to prescribe omalizumab to patients with ABPA, irrespective of whether they have AR. Dose adjustment of omalizumab is safe after disease control. The total serum IgE level might be a predictor of the effectiveness of omalizumab in patients without AR.